BackgroundUniversal antiretroviral therapy (ART) for all pregnant/ breastfeeding women living with Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), known as Prevention of mother-to child transmission of HIV (PMTCT) Option B+ (PMTCTB+), is being scaled up in most countries in Sub-Saharan Africa. In the transition to PMTCTB+, many countries face challenges with proper implementation of the HIV care cascade. We aimed to describe the feasibility of a PMTCTB+ approach in the public health sector in Swaziland.MethodsLifelong ART was offered to a cohort of HIV+ pregnant women aged ≥16 years at the first antenatal care (ANC1) visit in 9 public sector facilities, between 01/2013 and 06/2014. The study enrolment period was divided into 3 phases (early: 01–06/2013, mid: 07–12/2013 and late: 01–06/2014) to account for temporal trends. Kaplan-Meier estimates and Cox proportional-hazards regression models were applied for ART initiation and attrition analyses.ResultsOf 665 HIV+ pregnant women, 496 (74.6%) initiated ART. ART initiation increased in later study enrolment phases (mid: aHR: 1.41; later: aHR: 2.36), and decreased at CD4 ≥ 500 (aHR: 0.69). 52.9% were retained in care at 24 months. Attrition was associated with ANC1 in the third trimester (aHR: 2.37), attending a secondary care facility (aHR: 1.98) and ART initiation during later enrolment phases (mid aHR: 1.48; late aHR: 1.67). Of 373 women eligible, 67.3% received a first VL. 223/251 (88.8%) were virologically suppressed (< 1000 copies/mL). Of 670 infants, 53.6% received an EID test, 320/359 had a test result recorded and of whom 7 (2.2%) were HIV+.ConclusionsPMTCTB+ was found to be feasible in this setting, with high rates of maternal viral suppression and low transmission to the infant. High treatment attrition, poor follow-up of mother-baby pairs and under-utilisation of VL and EID testing are important programmatic challenges.

Background: HIV testing at birth may improve early treatment, but concerns remain about feasibility and retention of infants in care. In 2017, point-of-care (POC) HIV birth testing was introduced into routine care at 3 high-volume maternity health facilities in Eswatini. Methods: POC birth testing was offered to HIV-exposed infants (HEI) born at, or presenting to, 3 maternities within 3 days of birth. Data were collected from a project-specific EID test request form and routine registers on all tests conducted from August 1, 2017 to November 30, 2018, including retesting at 6-8 weeks for infants testing negative at birth and six-month retention in HIV care and viral load suppression among infants testing HIV-positive at birth. Results: Of 4322 eligible HEI, 3311 (76.6%) were tested. Twenty-six HIV-infected infants were identified (positivity rate 0.8%) and 25 initiated on antiretroviral therapy (ART) (96.1%). The median time from sample collection to ART initiation was 20.50 days (IQR 14-45). Twenty-one (84%) ART-initiated infants were on ART at 6 months after initiation. Nineteen infants (90.5%) had viral load test information at 6 months and 16 (84.2%) were virally suppressed. Of 3126 HEI testing negative at birth, 3004 (96.1%) were linked to laboratory databases and 2744 (91.3%) were retested at 6-8 weeks, with 9 (0.3%) additional infants testing HIV-positive. Conclusions: Uptake of POC birth testing was high in Eswatini with low HIV positivity. Almost all infants identified HIV-positive at birth were initiated on ART, with high retention in care and viral suppression. Birth testing did not seem to significantly reduce subsequent 6-8-week testing.

In high HIV prevalence settings, such as Swaziland, the incidence of HIV during pregnancy is high. An on-site training intervention for maternity nurses significantly increases the identification of HIV infection and maximizes the provision of PMTCT interventions.

Background: Testing for HIV at birth has the potential to identify infants infected in utero, and allows for the possibility of beginning treatment immediately after birth; point of care (POC) testing allows rapid return of results and faster initiation on treatment for positive infants. Eswatini piloted birth testing in three public maternities for over 2 years. Methods: In order to assess the acceptability of POC birth testing in the pilot sites in Eswatini, interviews were held with caregivers of HIV-exposed infants who were offered birth testing (N = 28), health care workers (N = 14), and policymakers (N = 10). Participants were purposively sampled. Interviews were held in English or SiSwati, and transcribed in English. Transcripts were coded by line, and content analysis and constant comparison were used to identify key themes for each respondent type. Results: Responses were categorized into: knowledge, experience, opinions, barriers and challenges, facilitators, and suggestions to improve POC birth testing. Preliminary findings reveal that point of care birth testing has been very well received but challenges were raised. Most caregivers appreciated testing the newborns at birth and getting results quickly, since it reduced anxiety of waiting for several weeks. However, having a favorable experience with testing was linked to having supportive and informed family members and receiving a negative result. Caregivers did not fully understand the need for blood draws as opposed to tests with saliva, and expressed the fears of seeing their newborns in pain. They were specifically grateful for supportive nursing staff who respected their confidentiality. Health care workers expressed strong support for the program but commented on the high demand for testing, increased workload, difficulty with errors in the testing machine itself, and struggles to implement the program without sufficient staffing, especially on evenings and weekends when phlebotomists were not available. Policymakers noted that there have been challenges within the program of losing mothers to follow up after they leave hospital, and recommended stronger linkages to community groups. Conclusions: There is strong support for scale-up of POC birth testing, but countries should consider ways to optimize staffing and manage demand.

The cost and cost-effectiveness outcomes from this study indicate that there is a robust economic case for pursuing the Option B+ approach in Swaziland and similar settings such as South Africa. Furthermore, these costs can be used to aid decision making and budgeting, for similar settings transitioning to test and treat strategy.