Rationale: Percutaneous cardiopulmonary support (PCPS) using extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) is widely used in the critical patients with cardiopulmonary collapse. It is a representative blood-consuming procedure. In limited situations in which the option of blood transfusion is unavailable, there is no general agreement as to whether ECMO is contraindicated. Patient concerns: A 61-year-old male Jehovah Witness with acute respiratory collapse and loss of consciousness was rushed to our emergency room. Throughout his hospital course, the patient's family refused any type of blood transfusion even at the risk of death. Diagnosis: The clinical situations were secondary to a massive pulmonary thromboembolism Interventions: The patient underwent veno-venous ECMO via both femoral veins. The patient was recovered by intensive medical care although the level of hemoglobin (Hb) and hematocrit (Hct) was gradually decreased from 15.8 g/dl and 46.8% to 11.7 g/dl and 36.5%, respectively. Outcomes: On hospital day 3, ECMO was successfully removed using a blood-sparing ECMO removal technique involving the recycling of blood within the circuit by continuous saline infusion. There was no significant change in level of Hb/Hct and hemodynamic profile. At 2 days after ECMO removal, the level of Hb/Hct was elevated up to 9.2 g/dl and 30.0%, respectively without any transfusion. Lessons: Our blood-sparing removal technique of ECMO appears to be feasible and led to no significant adverse impact on hemodynamic status. The technique might be helpful for critical patients who cannot receive blood transfusion due to any cause.
Vascular calcification is a major contributor to mortality in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) patients. In this study, we investigated whether there was a correlation between the coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and the vascular calcification score (VCS), and whether higher VCS increased the incidence of interventions and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE). ECG-gated CT, including vascular access and the coronary vessel, was taken. CACS and VCS were calculated by the Agatston method. A comparison of CACS and survival analysis according to VCS groups was performed. Using a cutoff of VCS = 500, 77 patients were divided into two groups. The vintage was significantly older in the higher VCS group. The median CACS was higher in the higher VCS group (21 [0, 171] vs. 552 [93, 2430], p < 0.001). The hazard ratio (HR) for interventions and MACCEs in the higher VCS group increased by 3.2 and 2.3, respectively. Additionally, a longer duration of hemodialysis and higher magnesium levels (>2.5 mg/dL) showed lower HRs for interventions (<1). We quantified VCS and found that it was associated with the CACS. Additionally, higher VCS increased the risk of access interventions and MACCE. VCS of the access site may be suggested as a biomarker to predict ESRD patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.