Background The female preponderance in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is a distinguishing feature of this disorder, but the association of sex with degree of diastolic dysfunction and clinical outcomes among individuals with HFpEF remains unclear. Methods and Results We conducted a prospective, multicenter, observational study of patients with HFpEF (PURSUIT‐HFpEF [Prospective Multicenter Observational Study of Patients with Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction]: UMIN000021831). Between 2016 and 2019, 871 patients were enrolled from 26 hospitals (follow‐up: 399±349 days). We investigated sex‐related differences in diastolic dysfunction and postdischarge clinical outcomes in patients with HFpEF. The echocardiographic end point was diastolic dysfunction according to American Society of Echocardiography/European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging criteria. The clinical end point was a composite of all‐cause death and heart failure readmission. Women accounted for 55.2% (481 patients) of the overall cohort. Compared with men, women were older and had lower prevalence rates of hypertension, coronary artery disease, and chronic kidney disease. Women had diastolic dysfunction more frequently than men (52.8% versus 32.0%, P <0.001). The incidence of the clinical end point did not differ between women and men (women 36.1/100 person‐years versus men 30.5/100 person‐years, P =0.336). Female sex was independently associated with the echocardiographic end point (adjusted odds ratio, 2.839; 95% CI, 1.884–4.278; P <0.001) and the clinical end point (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.538; 95% CI, 1.143–2.070; P =0.004). Conclusions Female sex was independently associated with the presence of diastolic dysfunction and worse clinical outcomes in a cohort of elderly patients with HFpEF. Our results suggest that a sex‐specific approach is key to investigating the pathophysiology of HFpEF. Registration URL: https://upload.umin.ac.jp ; Unique identifier: UMIN000021831.

No abstract

IntroductionNeither the pathophysiology nor an effective treatment for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) has been elucidated to date. The purpose of this ongoing study is to elucidate the pathophysiology and prognostic factors for patients with HFpEF admitted to participating institutes. We also aim to obtain insights into the development of new diagnostic and treatment methods by analysing patient background factors, clinical data and follow-up information.Methods and analysisThis study is a prospective, multicentre, observational study of patients aged ≥20 years admitted due to acute decompensated heart failure with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (≥50%) and elevated N-terminal-pro brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (≥400 pg/mL). The study began in June 2016, with the participation of Osaka University Hospital and 31 affiliated facilities. We will collect data on history in detail, accompanying diseases, quality of life, frailty score, medication history, and laboratory and echocardiographic data. We will follow-up each patient for 5 years, and collect outcome data on mortality, cause of death, and the number and cause of hospitalisation. The target number of registered cases is 1500 cases in 5 years.Ethics and disseminationThe protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of Osaka University Hospital on 24 February 2016 (ID: 15471), and by the IRBs of the all participating facilities. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations.

ObjectiveThe pathophysiological heterogeneity of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) makes the conventional ‘one-size-fits-all’ treatment approach difficult. We aimed to develop a stratification methodology to identify distinct subphenotypes of acute HFpEF using the latent class analysis.MethodsWe established a prospective, multicentre registry of acute decompensated HFpEF. Primary candidates for latent class analysis were patient data on hospital admission (160 features). The patient subset was categorised based on enrolment period into a derivation cohort (2016–2018; n=623) and a validation cohort (2019–2020; n=472). After excluding features with significant missingness and high degree of correlation, 83 features were finally included in the analysis.ResultsThe analysis subclassified patients (derivation cohort) into 4 groups: group 1 (n=215, 34.5%), characterised by arrythmia triggering (especially atrial fibrillation) and a lower comorbidity burden; group 2 (n=77, 12.4%), with substantially elevated blood pressure and worse classical HFpEF echocardiographic features; group 3 (n=149, 23.9%), with the highest level of GGT and total bilirubin and frequent previous hospitalisation for HF and group 4 (n=182, 29.2%), with infection-triggered HF hospitalisation, high C reactive protein and worse nutritional status. The primary end point—a composite of all-cause death and HF readmission—significantly differed between the groups (log-rank p<0.001). These findings were consistent in the validation cohort.ConclusionsThis study indicated the feasibility of clinical application of the latent class analysis in a highly heterogeneous cohort of patients with acute HFpEF. Patients can be divided into 4 phenotypes with distinct patient characteristics and clinical outcomes.Trial registration numberUMIN000021831.

Aims Frailty is associated with prognosis of cardiovascular diseases. However, the significance of frailty in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) remains to be elucidated. The purpose of this study was to examine the prognostic significance of the Clinical Frailty Scale (CFS) in real-world patients with HFpEF using data from a prospective multicentre observational study of patients with HFpEF (PURSUIT-HFpEF study). Method and ResultsWe classified 842 patients with HFpEF enrolled in the PURSUIT-HFpEF study into two groups using CFS. The registry enrolled patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of decompensated heart failure. Median age was 82 [interquartile range: 77, 87], and 45% of the patients were male. Of 842 patients, 406 were classified as high CFS (CFS ≥ 4, 48%) and 436 as low CFS (CFS ≤ 3, 52%). The primary endpoint was the composite of all-cause mortality and heart failure admission. Secondary endpoints were all-cause mortality and heart failure admission. Patients with high CFS were older (85 vs. 79 years, P < 0.001), predominantly female (65% vs. 46%, P < 0.001) and more likely to have New York Heart Association (NYHA) ≥ 2 (75% vs. 53%, P < 0.001) and a higher level of NT-proBNP (1360 vs 838 pg/mL, P < 0.001) than those with low CFS. Patients with high CFS had a significantly greater risk of composite endpoint (Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year event rate 39% vs. 23%, log-rank P < 0.001), all-cause mortality (Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year event rate 17% vs. 7%, log-rank P < 0.001) and heart failure admission (Kaplan-Meier estimated 1-year event rate 28% vs. 19%, log-rank P = 0.002) than those with low CFS. Multivariable Cox regression analysis revealed that high CFS was significantly associated with composite endpoint (adjusted HR 1.92, 95% CI 1.35-2.73, P < 0.001), all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 2.54, 95% CI 1.39-4.66, P = 0.003) and heart failure admission (adjusted HR 1.55, 95% CI 1.03-2.32, P = 0.035) even after adjustment for covariates. Moreover, change in CFS grade was also significantly associated with composite endpoint (adjusted HR 1.23, 95% CI 1.11-1.36, P < 0.001), all-cause mortality (adjusted HR 1.32, 95% CI 1.13-1.55, P = 0.001) and heart failure admission (adjusted HR 1.15, 95% CI 1.02-1.30, P = 0.021). Conclusions Frailty assessed by the CFS was associated with poor prognosis in patients with HFpEF.

Aims Considerable variation in the relationships between the indices of left atrial (LA) volume and pressure could possibly affect the selection of medications or efforts to improve the prognoses of patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We aimed to clarify the association between the prognostic endpoint and LA overload indices in elderly patients with HFpEF. Methods and resultsWe analysed 898 patients with HFpEF hospitalized for acute decompensated heart failure (men/ women: 406/492). Blood tests and transthoracic echocardiography were performed before discharge. The primary endpoint was re-admission for heart failure or all-cause mortality. Stroke volume (SV)/left atrial volume (LAV), an index for LA volume overload, was a significant prognostic factor of re-admission for heart failure in the multivariable Cox hazard analysis adjusted for comorbidities [hazard ratio (HR) 0.616, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.430-0.882, P = 0.008]. Additionally, the ratio of diastolic elastance (Ed) to arterial elastance (Ea), an index for LA pressure overload, was also significant (HR 1.444, 95% CI 1.014-2.058, P = 0.041). Furthermore, Ed/Ea, but not SV/LAV, was a significant prognostic factor of all-cause mortality (HR 1.594, 95% CI 1.102-2.306, P = 0.013). Conclusions The index of LA overload for prognosis may differ according to the different endpoints in elderly patients with HFpEF.

Background An association between uric acid (UA) and cardiovascular diseases, including heart failure (HF), has been reported. However, whether UA is a causal risk factor for HF is controversial. In particular, the prognostic value of lowering UA in patients with HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) is unclear. Methods and Results We enrolled patients with HFpEF from the PURSUIT‐HFpEF (Prospective Multicenter Observational Study of Patients With Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction) registry. We investigated whether UA was correlated with the composite events, including all‐cause mortality and HF rehospitalization, in patients with hyperuricemia and HFpEF (UA >7.0 mg/dL). Additionally, we evaluated whether lowering UA for 1 year (≥1.0 mg/dL) in them reduced mortality or HF rehospitalization. We finally analyzed 464 patients with hyperuricemia. In multivariable Cox regression analysis, UA was an independent determinant of composite death and rehospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15 [95% CI, 1.03–1.27], P =0.015). We divided them into groups with severe and mild hyperuricemia according to median estimated value of serum UA (8.3 mg/dL). Cox proportional hazards models revealed the incidence of all‐cause mortality was significantly higher in the group with severe hyperuricemia than in the group with mild hyperuricemia (HR, 1.73 [95% CI, 1.19–2.25], P =0.004). The incidence of all‐cause mortality was significantly decreased in the group with lowering UA compared with the group with nonlowering UA (HR, 1.71 [95% CI, 1.02–2.86], P =0.041). The incidence of urate‐lowering therapy tended to be higher in the group with lowering UA than in the group with nonlowering UA (34.9% versus 24.6%, P =0.06). Conclusions UA is a predictor for the composite of all‐cause death and HF rehospitalization in patients with hyperuricemia and HFpEF. In these patients, lowering UA, including the use of urate‐lowering therapy, may improve prognosis.

No abstract