Fusion of enveloped viruses with their target membrane is mediated by viral integral glycoproteins. A conformational change of their ectodomain triggers membrane fusion. Several studies suggest that an extended, triple-stranded rod-shaped alpha-helical coiled coil resembles a common structural and functional motif of the ectodomain of fusion proteins. From that, it is believed that essential features of the fusion process are conserved among the various enveloped viruses. However, this has not been established so far for the highly conserved transmembrane and intraviral sequences of fusion proteins. The article will focus on the role of both sequences in the fusion process. Recent studies from various enveloped viruses strongly imply that a transmembrane domain with a minimum length is required for later steps of membrane fusion, i.e., the formation and enlargement of the aqueous fusion pore. Although no specific sequence of the TM is necessary for pore formation, distinct properties and motifs of the domain may be obligatory to ascertain full fusion activity. However, with some exceptions, the intraviral domain seems to be not required for fusion activity of viral fusion proteins.

Electron cryomicrographs of intact parainfluenza virus 5 (PIV5) virions revealed two different surface structures, namely, a continuous layer and distinct individual spikes. The structure of these spikes reconstructed from intact virions was compared with known F ectodomain structures and was found to be different from the prefusion PIV5 F0 structure but, surprisingly, very similar to the human PIV3 F postfusion structure. Hence, we conclude that the individual F1؉F2 spikes in intact PIV5 virions also correspond to the postfusion state. Since the observed fusion activity of PIV5 virions has to be associated with prefusion F1؉F2 proteins, they have necessarily to be localized in the continuous surface structure. The data therefore strongly suggest that the prefusion state of the F1؉F2 protein requires stabilization, most probably by the association with hemagglutinin-neuraminidase. The conversion of F1؉F2 proteins from the prefusion toward the postfusion state while embedded in the virus membrane is topologically difficult to comprehend on the basis of established models and demands reconsideration of our current understanding.

The interaction of a spin-labeled lysophosphatidylcholine analog with intact and bromelain-treated influenza viruses as well as with the bromelain-solubilized hemagglutinin ectodomain has been studied. The inhibition of fusion of influenza viruses with erythrocytes by the lysophosphatidylcholine analog was similar to that observed for non-labeled lysophosphatidylcholine. Only a weak interaction of the lysophosphatidylcholine analog with the hemagglutinin ectodomain was observed even upon triggering the conformational change of the ectodomain at a low pH. A significant interaction of spin-labeled lysophosphatidylcholine with the hemagglutinin ectodomain of intact viruses was observed neither at neutral nor at low pH, whereas a strong interaction of the lipid analog with the viral lipid bilayer was evident. We suggest that the high number of lipid binding sites of the virus bilayer and their affinity compete efficiently with binding sites of the hemagglutinin ectodomain. We conclude that the inhibition of influenza virus fusion by lysolipids is not mediated by binding to the hemagglutinin ectodomain, preventing its interaction with the target membrane. The results unambiguously argue for an inhibition mechanism based on the action of lysolipid inserted into the lipid bilayer.

No abstract