Background: Prostate cancer is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in our male population, thus screening initiatives will help to improve outcomes. The current screening marker, total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), is not prostate cancer specific. The development of percentage free PSA (%FPSA) has largely improved the detection of prostate cancer.Objectives: To assess the performance of %FPSA ratio at the 25% cut-off and its ability to distinguish between prostate cancer and benign prostatic lesions.Methods: This was a retrospective study conducted on male patients with total prostate-specific antigen values 10 ng/ml and with prostate histology results. Male patients with total prostate-specific antigen between 4 and 10 ng/ml had their free prostate-specific antigen determined together with the calculation of the free prostate-specific antigen ratio. The ratio was then correlated with prostate histology results to determine the presence of prostate cancer at the cut-off ratio of 25%.Results: Prostate cancer was detected in 28 (21.37%) patients out of the total population of 131. Ninety-two patients had a FPSA ratio of 25%, 22 (22.8%) of whom were found to have prostate cancer. Notably the sensitivity and specificity were found to be 86% and 27% respectively, with a positive predictive of value of 21% at this cut-off.Conclusions: The study demonstrates a %FPSA ratio of 25% not to be a good discriminator between prostatic cancerous and benign lesions. It is thus recommended that a prostate biopsy should be done based on clinical examination findings rather than the level of total prostate specific antigen from 0–10 ng/ml or %FPSA ratio.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.