In many computational social simulation models only cursory reference to the foundations of the agent cognition used is made and computational expenses let many modellers chose simplistic agent cognition architectures. Both choices run counter to expectations framed by scholars active in the domain of rich cognitive modelling that see agent reasoning as socially inherently contextualized. The Manchester school of social simulation proposed a particular kind of a socially contextualized reasoning mechanism, so called endorsements, to implement the cognitive processes underlying agent action selection that eventually causes agent interaction. Its usefulness lies in its lightweight architecture and in taking into account folk psychological conceptions of how reasoning works. These and other advantages make endorsements an amenable tool in everyday social simulation modelling. A yet outstanding comprehensive introduction to the concept of endorsements is provided and its theoretical basis is extended and extant research is critically reviewed. Improvements to endorsements regarding memory and perception are suggested and tested against a case-study.
Environmental issues pose enormous risks for all populations, but especially for the vulnerable. There have been many attempts to measure the risks and the costs of environmental episodes. Such measurement is seen in many quarters as a matter of increasing urgency as a result of the prospect of climate change. The economic approach to vulnerability measurement is based on cost-benefit analysis (CBA). CBA itself is predicated on the proposition that all relevant impacts of climate change can be given a numerical value. A clear argument for this approach was offered by the late David Pearce [13]. The value to be chosen is what the "market" value of the marginal costs and benefits. Where there is no relevant market, individuals must be able to state what they would pay to be able to stay where they are or the money they would accept as an inducement to move from where they are. In many, perhaps most, cases valuation is by no means so simple since actions are taken in response to environmental and political events. In this paper, we investigate one such case concerning the Sahel region at the edge of the Sahara. In the Sahel 1 , typically individuals migrate but who migrates and whither they migrate is a household decision. It would be remarkable if such decisions taken by one household were not influenced by the behaviour of other households. Consequently, any attempt to value migration will depend not only on environmental and political events of the moment but also on the social norms that emerge as household decisions are reached and as those decisions are discussed among members (or heads) of households in the same communities. This sort of social decision making does not fit easily with the sort of economic theory with its monetization arguments on which CBA is based.[8] Due to the way a standard economical approach measures and evaluates cost and benefit, lots of social context in the examined domain gets lost. This social context, in its turn, might have a significant influence on the outcomes of the CBA results and thus be never evaluated. The core question addressed in this paper is whether and how agent-based social simulation can provide a superior alternative to conventional economic analysis. In particular, do models constrained by evidence rather than simplistic theory provide a better guide to policy? The model reported here demonstrates that the answer to this question is in the affirmative. 2 The evidence 2 The Sahel is subject to the greatest climatic variation of any region in the world 3. One feature of this variability is the unpredictable occurrence and duration of droughts. Several studies [1, 14] have assessed the impact of intermittent droughts and their resulting catastrophic effects. These circumstances of the case offer a good testbed for validating the theories postulated by this paper about agent-based modelling being a better alternative to CBA than a conventional economic approach. CBA will be 1 The sourthern edge of the Sahara desert covering parts of Mali, Nigeria, Senegal, Chad, et...
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.