In this paper, we reveal an intriguing relationship between two seemingly unrelated notions: letter graphs and geometric grid classes of permutations. An important property common for both of them is well-quasi-orderability, implying, in a non-constructive way, a polynomial-time recognition of geometric grid classes of permutations and k-letter graphs for a fixed k. However, constructive algorithms are available only for k = 2. In this paper, we present the first constructive polynomial-time algorithm for the recognition of 3-letter graphs. It is based on a structural characterization of graphs in this class. * An extended abstract of this paper was published in [2].

How to cite:Please refer to published version for the most recent bibliographic citation information. If a published version is known of, the repository item page linked to above, will contain details on accessing it.

The class of quasi-chain graphs is an extension of the well-studied class of chain graphs. This latter class enjoys many nice and important properties, such as bounded clique-width, implicit representation, well-quasi-ordering by induced subgraphs, etc. The class of quasi-chain graphs is substantially more complex. In particular, this class is not well-quasi-ordered by induced subgraphs, and the clique-width is not bounded in it. In the present paper, we show that the universe of quasi-chain graphs is at least as complex as the universe of permutations by establishing a bijection between the class of all permutations and a subclass of quasi-chain graphs. This implies, in particular, that the induced subgraph isomorphism problem is NP-complete for quasi-chain graphs. On the other hand, we propose a decomposition theorem for quasi-chain graphs that implies an implicit representation for graphs in this class and efficient solutions for some algorithmic problems that are generally intractable.

No abstract

No abstract

What are the unavoidable induced subgraphs of graphs with large treewidth? It is well-known that the answer must include a complete graph, a complete bipartite graph, all subdivisions of a wall and line graphs of all subdivisions of a wall (we refer to these graphs as the "basic treewidth obstructions.") So it is natural to ask whether graphs excluding the basic treewidth obstructions as induced subgraphs have bounded teewidth. Sintiari and Trotignon answered this question in negative. Their counterexamples, the so-called "layered wheels," contain wheels, where a wheel consists of a hole (i.e. an induced cycle of length at least four) along with a vertex with at least three neighbors in the hole. This leads one to ask whether wheels are essential to the construction of layered wheels, that is, whether graphs excluding wheels and the basic treewidth obstructions as induced subgraphs have bounded treewidth. This also turns out be false due to Davies' recent example of graphs with large treewidth and no induced subgraph isomorphic to (fairly small) basic treewidth obstructions, in which every vertex has at most two neighbors in every hole.Here we prove that a hole with a vertex with at least two neighbors in it is inevitable in a counterexample: graphs in which every vertex has at most one neighbor in every hole (that does not contain it) and with the basic treewidth obstructions excluded as induced subgraphs have bounded treewidth.

Given a graph H, we prove that every (theta, prism)-free graph of sufficiently large treewidth contains either a large clique or an induced subgraph isomorphic to H, if and only if H is a forest.

No abstract