Background
Although self‐expandable metal stent (SEMS) placement as bridge to surgery (BTS) in patients with left‐sided obstructing colonic cancer has shown promising short‐term results, it is used infrequently owing to uncertainty about its oncological safety. This population study compared long‐term oncological outcomes between emergency resection and SEMS placement as BTS.
Methods
Through a national collaborative research project, long‐term outcome data were collected for all patients who underwent resection for left‐sided obstructing colonic cancer between 2009 and 2016 in 75 Dutch hospitals. Patients were identified from the Dutch Colorectal Audit database. SEMS as BTS was compared with emergency resection in the curative setting after 1 : 2 propensity score matching.
Results
Some 222 patients who had a stent placed were matched to 444 who underwent emergency resection. The overall SEMS‐related perforation rate was 7·7 per cent (17 of 222). Three‐year locoregional recurrence rates after SEMS insertion and emergency resection were 11·4 and 13·6 per cent (P = 0·457), disease‐free survival rates were 58·8 and 52·6 per cent (P = 0·175), and overall survival rates were 74·0 and 68·3 per cent (P = 0·231), respectively. SEMS placement resulted in significantly fewer permanent stomas (23·9 versus 45·3 per cent; P < 0·001), especially in elderly patients (29·0 versus 57·9 per cent; P < 0·001). For patients in the SEMS group with or without perforation, 3‐year locoregional recurrence rates were 18 and 11·0 per cent (P = 0·432), disease‐free survival rates were 49 and 59·6 per cent (P = 0·717), and overall survival rates 61 and 75·1 per cent (P = 0·529), respectively.
Conclusion
Overall, SEMS as BTS seems an oncologically safe alternative to emergency resection with fewer permanent stomas. Nevertheless, the risk of SEMS‐related perforation, as well as permanent stoma, might influence shared decision‐making for individual patients.
Patients with breast cancer in whom axillary metastases are detected by ultrasound-guided biopsy have significantly more involved nodes than SLNB-positive patients. This finding enables further preoperative tailoring of axillary treatment in breast cancer.
The use of pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) to stimulate bone growth has been recommended as an alternative to the surgical treatment of ununited scaphoid fractures, but has never been examined in acute fractures. We hypothesised that the use of PEMF in acute scaphoid fractures would accelerate the time to union by 30% in a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial. A total of 53 patients in three different medical centres with a unilateral undisplaced acute scaphoid fracture were randomly assigned to receive either treatment with PEMF (n = 24) or a placebo (n = 29). The clinical and radiological outcomes were assessed at four, six, nine, 12, 24 and 52 weeks. A log-rank analysis showed that neither time to clinical and radiological union nor the functional outcome differed significantly between the groups. The clinical assessment of union indicated that at six weeks tenderness in the anatomic snuffbox (p = 0.03) as well as tenderness on longitudinal compression of the scaphoid (p = 0.008) differed significantly in favour of the placebo group. We conclude that stimulation of bone growth by PEMF has no additional value in the conservative treatment of acute scaphoid fractures.
The aim of this study was to evaluate the value of Ultrasonography (US) guided fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of the axilla to identify breast cancer patients with extensive nodal involvement. A prospective database of breast cancer patients who underwent US-guided FNA of suspicious nodes, diagnosed between 2000 and 2007 was analyzed. Patients with a negative axillary US or C2 (benign) FNA result underwent SLNB. Patients with C5 (malignant) FNA result underwent axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). All SLNB positive patients underwent completion ALND. The number of positive nodes after ALND was documented and analyzed. A total of 1,448 patients were included. US sensitivity was 34.2 %, specificity was 96.2 % and the accuracy was 71.7 %. For US-guided FNA this was 89, 100 and 90.4 %, respectively. In 234/1,448 patients (16.2 %) US-guided FNA was performed. A total of 19/41 C2 patients (46.3 %) had a positive SLNB. A median of 1 (range 1-6) positive node was found. A median of 4 (range 1-30) positive nodes were found in 158 C5 patients. In 376/1,214 patients with a negative US, SLNB was positive. A median of 2 (range 1-38) positive nodes were found. There was a significant difference in nodal involvement between C5 and SLNB positive patients (p = 0.043 and p < 0.0001, respectively). Ultrasound-guided FNA is a highly specific technique for detecting axillary metastases in breast cancer patients. Patients with US-guided FNA-diagnosed axillary metastases have significantly more involved nodes compared to SLNB positive patients.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.