1. Recent studies have demonstrated the existence of positive density dependence in the survival and development of Drosophila (the so-called Allee effect); however the underlying mechanisms of such Allee effects have remained elusive. Competition with filamentous fungi have often been suggested to be involved in causing high mortality at low larval density, but it has not yet been explicitly tested if the well known spatial aggregation of insect eggs yields a fitness benefit for the developing larvae in the presence of noxious moulds.2. Using Drosophila melanogaster, the present study tested whether larval survival is greater in aggregations when confronted with various combinations of three representative mould species (Aspergillus, Alternaria, and Penicillium) and a head start for fungal development.3. High rates of fungal-dependent mortality and significant positive densitydependent larval survival (i.e. Allee effects) were observed when larvae were confronted with food resources containing established colonies of Aspergillus or Alternaria. Neither the simultaneous transfer of Aspergillus or Alternaria spores with larvae to food patches nor food infections with Penicillium affected insect larval development.4. Significant correlations between mould growth and larval survival could be identified, although the patterns that emerged were shown to be inconsistent when the effects were compared between fungal species and fungal priority. Because mould growth only partly explained larval survival, the influence of other fungal-borne factors, e.g. mycotoxins, needs to be elucidated in order to understand the mechanistic basis of insect-mould interactions.5. These results are the first to argue convincingly for moulds being involved in mediating Allee effects for insects on ephemeral resources; however they also demonstrate an unexpected diversity in insect-mould interactions. Considering this diversity may be important in understanding insect spatial ecology.

The larval stages of saprophagous insects and filamentous fungi have been demonstrated to be serious competitors on decaying organic matter. When filamentous fungi appear to be competitively superior, fungal mycotoxins have frequently been suggested to constitute chemical weapons, causing high mortality among insect larvae. In this study, we tested whether typical fungal secondary compounds can indeed be considered as the underlying mechanism of interference competition between filamentous fungi and various saprophagous Drosophila species. In contrast to our expectation, we found no grand mycotoxin-specific effects, but insect survival appeared to be generally determined by complex interaction between toxin identity, toxin concentration and insect species. Three out of five drosophilids seemed to be equally affected by the mycotoxins used in this study, whereas two species showed toxin-specific changes in survival. Only two (Kojic acid and Ochratoxin A) out of seven mycotoxins caused insect-specific responses. Moreover, we discovered correlations between survival in toxin-free and spoiled substrates, which may indicate an interrelationship between intra-specific competitive ability and resistance to mycotoxins. We discuss the significance of mycotoxins as underlying mechanisms driving competitive insect-fungus interactions.