No abstract

Primary HPV DNA-based screening with cytology triage and repeat HPV DNA testing of cytology-negative women appears to be the most feasible cervical screening strategy.

Key words: HPV; human papillomavirus; DNA; mRNA; PreTect HPV-Proofer; NASBA; PCR; ASCUS; LSIL Cytological cervical cancer screening programs have been successful in reducing the incidence of cervical cancer, even though a single conventional Papanicolaou (Pap) smear is only moderately accurate and does not achieve concurrent high sensitivity and specificity. 1,2 The management of women with atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance (ASCUS) and low-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (LSIL) is problematic because only a small proportion will progress to cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) 3 and invasive cervical carcinoma (ICC). Histologically verified CIN has been found in 10 -60% of women with an ASCUS diagnosis, with CIN2/3 present in more than 5%. 3-11 Pap smear follow-up of women with an ASCUS smear fails to identify all women at higher risk of CIN2ϩ, suggesting that cervical cancer screening programs might benefit from implementing new diagnostic tests in the triage of women with equivocal Pap smears. 12 Infection with high-risk (HR) types of HPV is necessary for the development of ICC 13-16 and the expression of the E6/E7 oncogenes is necessary for conversion to and maintenance of malignancy in cervical tissue. [17][18][19] Therefore, detection of the E6/E7 mRNA of HR-HPV types might serve as a better risk evaluation factor than mere DNA detection for the development of high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL) and ICC. 20 The combination of cytology and HPV testing seems to save additional life at a reasonable cost compared to Pap testing alone. 21,22 Detection of E6/E7 mRNA can be achieved by using the commercial PreTect HPV-Proofer assay (NorChip AS, Klokkarstua, Norway), that utilizes nucleic acid sequence based amplification (NASBA).The aim of our study was to assess whether a positive HPV mRNA or DNA test at the time of an ASCUS or LSIL Pap-smear identifies women diagnosed with a histological CIN2ϩ after 2 years of follow-up. Material and methods Study subjectsThe study subjects comprise a subgroup from 4,136 women older than 30 years of age that visited a selection of gynecologists in Oslo, Norway, and have been tested in 2001 for the presence of HPV DNA by Gp5ϩ/6ϩ consensus PCR and E6/E7 transcripts by real-time multiplex NASBA (PreTect HPV-Proofer, NorChip AS) in addition to cytology. 35 PreTect HPV-Proofer detects mRNA from HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33 and 45, whereas Gp5ϩ/6ϩ consensus PCR detects HPV DNA from the L1 region in Ͼ20 HPV types. We included all women with an index Pap smear diagnosis of ASCUS or LSIL (n ϭ 77). The index Pap smear refers to the smear taken together with the HPV testing. Information on Pap smears in the 10-year period before the inclusion in our study was obtained from CRN registers. Former abnormal smears mean any smear that is not normal or unsatisfactory and has been taken before the index smear in 2001. Follow-upSeventy-seven women were followed up for 24 months in the registers of the Cancer Registry of Norway (CRN) with subsequent Pap smears...

No abstract

Using a procedure based on restriction enzyme cleavage, self-ligation, and inverse polymerase chain reaction (rliPCR), the authors investigated 18 cervical intraepithelial neoplasia III (CIN III) cases and 37 invasive squamous carcinomas for integration of human papillomavirus type 16 (HPV16). All eighteen CIN III cases (severe dysplasia or high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion) were found to harbor episomal HPV, but one of the samples contained mixed episomal and integrated forms. Seventeen of 37 invasive cervical carcinoma samples were identified previously as containing the completely integrated HPV16 genome by using PCR covering the entire E1/E2 gene, and this was confirmed by rliPCR in 16 cases. One case, however, showed a low level of episomal deoxyribonucleic acid in addition to the predominant integrated form. Of the remaining 20 carcinoma samples showing episomal forms in the previous analysis, 14 were found to contain integrated forms using rliPCR, and four contained multimeric episomal forms. Thus, in total, 31 of 37 of the carcinomas (84%) showed the integrated HPV16 genome. The rliPCR product from five carcinoma cases was cloned into a plasmid vector and used as a template for "primer walking" deoxyribonucleic acid sequencing to deduce human sequences flanking the integrated HPV genome. Based on this information, bacterial artificial chromosome (BAC) and P1-derived artificial chromosome (PAC) clones were obtained and used as probes in fluorescent in situ hybridization experiments on human metaphase chromosomes. The results of the fluorescent in situ hybridization experiments showed evidence for HPV16 integration in chromosome regions 1q25, 3q28, 6p25, 11p13, and 18q22. Sixteen carcinoma samples, containing episomal HPV16, were sequenced in the long control region. Evidence for changes in E2 binding or silencer YY1 sequences was found in only two samples.

The purpose of this study was to compare the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA with detection of mRNA. The study included 4,136 women >30 years of age. E6/E7 mRNA expression from the carcinogenic HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45 was detected by the PreTect HPVProofer assay, whereas the presence of HPV DNA was detected by Gp5+/6+ consensus PCR followed by typespecific PCR. A total of 4.0% had an abnormal cytologic diagnosis, 3.0% were positive by PreTect HPV-Proofer, 4.4% by type-specific PCR, and 10.4% by consensus PCR. For detection of HPV in high-grade squamous intraepithelial lesion (HSIL), no significant difference was observed between PreTect HPV-Proofer and consensus PCR. For women with a cytologic normal, atypical squamous cell of uncertain significance, and low-grade SIL diagnosis, the detection rate of HPV was significantly higher by Gp5+/6+ consensus PCR (P < 0.005) than by PreTect HPV-Proofer. Histology confirmed 14 of 23 cytologic HSIL as cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade >2. Of these women, PreTect HPV-Proofer and type-specific PCR detected 12, whereas consensus PCR detected 13. In conclusion, for HSIL, detection of E6/E7 transcripts from HPV types 16, 18, 31, 33, and 45 are present to the same degree as DNA detected by consensus PCR. Equally important, only a small proportion of the HPV DNA -positive women with a normal, atypical squamous cell of uncertain significance or low-grade SIL diagnosis had a detectable mRNA expression. HPV E6/E7 mRNA detection by PreTect HPV-Proofer represents a new promising test as an adjunct to cytology.

The role of breast FNAC in diagnosis and clinical management: a survey of current practice Most participating countries have now adopted a triple assessment approach, i.e. clinical,imaging and pathology, to breast diagnosis, with FNAC as the first-line pathological investigation in both screening and symptomatic populations, with the exception of microcalcifications. Pathologists specialized in cytopathology are best qualified to collect and interpret FNAC samples, but this is not always possible or practical. Radiologists involved in breast imaging should ensure that they have the necessary skills to carry out FNAC under all forms of image guidance. Best results are achieved by a combination of both techniques, as shown in the image-guided FNAC in the presence of the cytopathologist. The majority of European countries use similar reporting systems for breast FNAC (C1-C5), in keeping with European Guidelines for Quality Assurance in Breast Cancer Screening and Diagnosis, although some still prefer descriptive reporting only. When triple assessment is concordant, final treatment may proceed on the basis of FNAC, without a tissue biopsy. ER and PR assessment can be done safely on FNAC material. However, not all institutions may have expertise in doing this. HER-2 protein expression on direct cytological preparations is insufficiently reliable for clinical use, although its use for FISH is possible, if expertise is available. The majority of participants practise a degree of one-stop diagnosis with a cytopathologist present in the outpatient clinic. Formal recognition of the importance of the time spent outside the laboratory, both for cytopathologist and cytotechnologist, is necessary in order to ensure appropriate resourcing. The use of core biopsy (CB) has increased, although not always for evidence-based reasons. CB and FNAC are not mutually exclusive. FNAC should be used in diagnosis of benign, symptomatic lesions and CB in microcalcifications, suspicious FNAC findings and malignancies where radiology cannot guarantee stromal invasion. Keywords: breast cancer, breast diagnosis, breast management, breast cytology, FNA, core biopsy Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) has been extensively used for many years in the diagnosis of breast lesions, but its use has gradually been reduced in many screening programmes because of its controversial inadequate rates and suboptimal accuracy in inexperienced hands. 1-3

Using multiple PCR primer sets, we tried to optimize the detection of human papillomavirus (HPV) in DNA samples isolated from 361 frozen biopsy specimens from patients with invasive cervical carcinomas. The HPVs detected were placed into three distinct groups, including group I/I neg at Telelab (Skien, Norway) and group I neg and group II at the Norwegian Radium Hospital (Oslo, Norway). The consensus primer sets were Oli-1b-oli-2i, My09-My11, Gp5-Gp6, and Gp5؉-Gp6؉ from the HPV L1 gene and CpI-CpIIG from the E1 gene. Using these consensus primers together with the type-specific primers from E6-E7, we found that 355 patients (98%) were HPV positive. Type-specific primers for HPV types 11, 16, 18, 31, 33, and 35 detected more HPV-infected patients than the most sensitive consensus primer set, while the three consensus primer sets My, Gp/Gp؉, and Cp together detected more HPV-positive patients than the type-specific primers. Testing of sensitivity of the PCR with SiHa cells serially diluted in lymphocytes (HPV-negative cells) indicated a detection limit of 6,300 HPV type 16 DNA copies with consensus primers (My, Gp؉, and Cp) and 126 original HPV type 16 DNA copies with type-specific primers. Comparison of the amplification results for consensus L1 primers and type-specific E6-E7 primers indicated the presence of L1 deletions in 23 of 56 samples. The conclusion is that in PCR detection systems, multiple consensus primers and type-specific primers should be used in order to detect all patients harboring HPV.