This paper acknowledges progress over the last 20 years in addressing intergenerational risks to the mental health of children whose parents experience mental illness (COPMI-Children of Parents with a Mental Illness and FaPMI-Families Where a Parent Has a Mental Illness) and emphasises ongoing challenges to implement evidence informed family focused interventions. Challenges include variability in practice at individual, regional, and cross-national service system levels and the gap between implementation science and practice. This article begins to address this gap with descriptions of key systems approaches and implementation strategies from around the world to illustrate variability and common themes. A multifaceted, integrated systems approach is proposed as a way forward. Learnings and experience from initiatives, expertise and evidence targeting other vulnerable groups and successful change implementation will enhance existing (COPMI/FaPMI) efforts to facilitate systems change and improve the lives and futures of these children and families around the world.

No abstract

BackgroundNorway is one of the first countries to require all health professionals to play a part in prevention for children of parents with all kinds of illnesses (mental illness, drug addiction, or severe physical illness or injury) in order to mitigate their increased risk of psychosocial problems. Hospitals are required to have child responsible personnel (CRP) to promote and coordinate support given by health professionals to patients who are parents and to their children.MethodsThis study examined the extent to which the new law had been implemented as intended in Norwegian hospitals, using Fixsen’s Active Implementation Framework. A stratified random sample of managers and child responsible personnel (n = 167) from five Hospitals filled in an adapted version of the Implementation Components Questionnaire (ICQ) about the implementation of policy changes. Additional information was collected from 21 hospital coordinators (H-CRP) from 16 other hospitals.ResultsSignificant differences were found between the five hospitals, with lowest score from the smallest hopitals. Additional analysis, comparing the 21 hospitals, as reported by the H-CRP, suggests a clear pattern of smaller hospitals having less innovative resources to implement the policy changes. Leadership, resources and system intervention (strategies to work with other systems) were key predictors of a more successful implementation process.ConclusionsLegal changes are helpful, but quality improvements are needed to secure equal chances of protection and support for children of ill parents.Trial registrationThe study is approved by the Regional Committee on Medical and Health Research Etics South-East (reg.no. 2012/1176) and by the Privacy Ombudsmann.

BackgroundHealth professionals in Norway are required by law to help safeguard information and follow-up with children of parents with mental or physical illness, or who have substance abuse problems, to reduce their higher risk of psychosocial problems. Knowledge is lacking regarding whether organisation and/or worker-related factors can explain the differences in health professionals’ ability to support the families when patients are parents.MethodsEmploying a translated, generic version of the Family Focused Mental Health Practice Questionnaire (FFPQ), this cross-sectional study examines family focused practice (FFP) differences in relation to health professionals’ background and role (N = 280) along with exploring predictors of parent, child, and family support.ResultsWhile most health professions had begun to have conversations with parents on children’s needs, under one-third have had conversations with children. There were significant differences between nurses, social workers, psychologists, physicians, and others on seven of the FFP subscales, with physicians scoring lowest on five subscales and psychologists providing the least family support. Controlling for confounders, there were significant differences between child responsible personnel (CRP) and other clinicians (C), with CRP scoring significantly higher on knowledge and skills, confidence, and referrals. Predictors of FFP varied between less complex practices (talking with parents) and more complex practices (family support and referrals).ConclusionThe type of profession was a key predictor of delivering family support, suggesting that social workers have more undergraduate training to support families, followed by nurses; alternately, the results could suggest that that social workers and nurses have been more willing or able than physicians and psychologists to follow the new legal requirements. The findings highlight the importance of multidisciplinary teams and of tailoring training strategies to health professionals’ needs in order to strengthen their ability to better support children and families when a parent is ill.