Summary The anti-tumour activity of CPT-l 1, a topoisomerase I inhibitor, was evaluated in four human neural-crest-derived paediatric tumour xenografts: one peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour (pPNET) (SK-N-MC) and three neuroblastomas. Two models, SK-N-MC and IGR-N835, were established in athymic mice from a previously established in vitro cell line. Two new neuroblastoma xenograft models, IGR-NB3 and IGR-NB8, were derived from previously untreated non-metastatic neuroblastomas. They exhibited the classic histological features of immature neuroblastoma along with N-myc amplification, paradiploidy, chromosome lp deletions and overexpression of the human mdrl gene. These tumour markers have been shown to be poor prognostic factors in children treated for neuroblastoma. CPT-11 was tested against advanced stage subcutaneous tumours. CPT-11 was administered i.v. using an intermittent (q4d x 3) and a daily x 5 schedule. The optimal dosage and schedule was 40 mg kg-' daily for 5 days. At this highest non-toxic dose, CPT-11 induced 100% tumour-free survivors on day 121 in mice bearing the pPNET SK-N-MC xenograft. For the three neuroblastoma xenografts, 38-100% complete tumour regressions were observed with a tumour growth delay from 38 to 42 days, and anti-tumour activity was clearly sustained at a lower dosage (27 mg kg-' day-'). The efficacy of five anti-cancer drugs commonly used in paediatric oncology or in clinical development was evaluated against SK-N-MC and IGR-N835. The sensitivity of these two xenografts to cyclophosphamide, thiotepa and cisplatin was of the same order of magnitude as that of CPT-11, but they were refractory to etoposide and taxol. In conclusion, CPT-11 demonstrated significant activity against pPNET and neuroblastoma xenografts. Further clinical development of CPT-11 in paediatric oncology is warranted.

The relevance of circadian rhythms in irinotecan and oxaliplatin tolerability was investigated with regard to antitumour activity. Mice bearing Glasgow osteosarcoma (GOS) received single agent irinotecan (50 or 60 mg kg 71 per day) or oxaliplatin (4 or 5.25 mg kg 71 per day) at one of six dosing times expressed in hours after light onset (3, 7, 11, 15, 19 or 23 hours after light onset). Irinotecan (50 mg kg 71 per day) and oxaliplatin (4 or 5.25 mg kg 71 per day) were given 1 min apart at 7 or 15 hours after light onset, or at their respective times of best tolerability (7 hours after light onset for irinotecan and 15 hours after light onset for oxaliplatin) or worst tolerability (15 hours after light onset for irinotecan and 7 hours after light onset for oxaliplatin). Tumour growth rate was nearly halved and per cent increase in estimated life span (% ILS) was -doubled in the mice receiving irinotecan at 7 hours after light onset as compared to 15 hours after light onset (P50.05). Results of similar magnitude were obtained with oxaliplatin for both endpoints, yet with 7 hours after light onset corresponding to least efficacy and 15 hours after light onset to best efficacy (P50.05). Irinotecan addition to oxaliplatin proved therapeutic benefit only if the schedule consisted of irinotecan administration at 7 hours after light onset and oxaliplatin delivery at 15 hours after light onset, i.e. when both drugs were given near their respective 'best' circadian times. These would correspond to the middle of the night for irinotecan and the middle of the day for oxaliplatin in humans.

No abstract