ÖZET

With the onset of digitalization in communication the production, distribution and consumption patterns of news are undergoing a radical change. While traditional media is losing power day by day, new media, a media designation to cover the internet and social media, has led the consumer to become the producer and distributor of news at the same time. The shake-up of the professional and classical understanding in the production processes has revealed significant problems in news reliability. Misinformation and fake news have become major problems due to the disruption of the news control mechanism. The content produced in new media reaches the consumer directly and this information and news whose accuracy cannot be controlled causes the "contortion" of the truth.The aim of this study was to determine the views and behaviors of university students regarding the use of new media, their attitudes towards misinformation, the production, circulation and consumption of misinformation or fake news.At the end of the field survey, students of communication faculty found traditional media biased, consumed news from social media and websites, while avoiding news sharing on social media, showed more interest in closed messaging applications. "Avoidance of research" and "political polarization" are cited in the reasons for believing fake news while most doubt politics and security news.

No abstract

Bu lisans, yazarın orijinal yaratıcı olarak atfedilmesi ve yeniden kullanımın ticari olmayan amaçlarla, yani araştırma veya eğitim amaçlı kullanımla sınırlı olması koşuluyla, kullanıcıların makaleyi kullanmasına, çoğaltmasına, yaymasına veya görüntülemesine izin verir.

In this study, whether or not the criteria affecting plot value changes depending on age was investigated in Ankara, Konya and Kayseri, which are three major cities of The Central Anatolian Region in Turkey, through survey method. 2,531 respondents, who were 18 and older, were included in the survey based on a technical viewpoint. Respondents consisted of 559 experts and 1,915 citizens. Fifty seven survey forms were considered invalid for several reasons and excluded from evaluation. The experts were selected from among people who worked on real estate valuation by using The Purposeful Sampling Method. The citizens were chosen from among people who could as well be agents in purchase and sale of the real estate by using The Simple Random Sampling Method. The survey questions were prepared on a Five-Point Likert Scale. These were made up of a total 82 questions and two main titles as locational (64 criteria) and neighbourhood (18 criteria) features (except for demographic questions). The age of the respondents was classified into six different groups. Whether or not averages of criteria were significantly different depending on the age groups was tested by ANOVA. Differences between the age groups were determined through several criteria.