The ubiquitous SecY/Sec61–complex translocates nascent secretory proteins across cellular membranes and integrates membrane proteins into lipid bilayers. Several structures of mostly detergent solubilized Sec–complexes have been reported. Here, we present a single–particle cryo–electron microscopy structure of the SecYEG complex in a membrane environment at sub–nanometer resolution, bound to a translating ribosome. Using the SecYEG complex reconstituted in a so–called Nanodisc, we could trace the nascent polypeptide chain from the peptidyl transferase center into the membrane. The reconstruction allowed for the identification of ribosome–lipid interactions. The rRNA helix 59 (H59) directly contacts the lipid surface and appears to modulate the membrane in immediate vicinity to the proposed lateral gate of the PCC. Based on our map and molecular dynamics simulations we present a model of a signal anchor–gated PCC in the membrane.

The biogenesis of secretory as well as transmembrane proteins requires the activity of the universally conserved protein-conducting channel (PCC), the Sec61 complex (SecY complex in bacteria). In eukaryotic cells the PCC is located in the membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum where it can bind to translating ribosomes for co-translational protein transport. The Sec complex consists of three subunits (Sec61α, β and γ) and provides an aqueous environment for the translocation of hydrophilic peptides as well as a lateral opening in the Sec61α subunit that has been proposed to act as a gate for the membrane partitioning of hydrophobic domains. A plug helix and a so-called pore ring are believed to seal the PCC against ion flow and are proposed to rearrange for accommodation of translocating peptides. Several crystal and cryo-electron microscopy structures revealed different conformations of closed and partially open Sec61 and SecY complexes. However, in none of these samples has the translocation state been unambiguously defined biochemically. Here we present cryo-electron microscopy structures of ribosome-bound Sec61 complexes engaged in translocation or membrane insertion of nascent peptides. Our data show that a hydrophilic peptide can translocate through the Sec complex with an essentially closed lateral gate and an only slightly rearranged central channel. Membrane insertion of a hydrophobic domain seems to occur with the Sec complex opening the proposed lateral gate while rearranging the plug to maintain an ion permeability barrier. Taken together, we provide a structural model for the basic activities of the Sec61 complex as a protein-conducting channel.

Protein biosynthesis, the translation of the genetic code into polypeptides, occurs on ribonucleoprotein particles called ribosomes. Although X-ray structures of bacterial ribosomes are available, high-resolution structures of eukaryotic 80S ribosomes are lacking. Using cryoelectron microscopy and single-particle reconstruction, we have determined the structure of a translating plant (Triticum aestivum) 80S ribosome at 5.5-Å resolution. This map, together with a 6.1-Å map of a Saccharomyces cerevisiae 80S ribosome, has enabled us to model ∼98% of the rRNA. Accurate assignment of the rRNA expansion segments (ES) and variable regions has revealed unique ES-ES and r-protein-ES interactions, providing insight into the structure and evolution of the eukaryotic ribosome.modeling | molecular dynamics | flexible fitting I n all living cells, the translation of mRNA into polypeptide occurs on ribosomes. Ribosomes provide a platform upon which aminoacyl-tRNAs interact with the mRNA as well as position the aminoacyl-tRNAs for peptide-bond formation (1). Ribosomes are composed of two subunits, a small subunit that monitors the mRNA-tRNA codon-anticodon duplex to ensure fidelity of decoding (2, 3) and a large subunit that contains the active site where peptide-bond formation occurs (4). Both the small and large subunits are composed of RNA and protein: In eubacteria such as Escherichia coli, the small subunit contains one 16S rRNA and 21 ribosomal proteins (r proteins), whereas the large subunit contains 5S and 23S rRNAs and 33 r proteins. Crystal structures of the complete bacterial 70S ribosome were initially reported at 5.5 Å (5), with an interpretation based on atomic models of the individual subunit structures (6-8), and are now available at atomic resolution (9). These structures have provided unparalleled insight into the mechanism of different steps of translation (1) as well as inhibition by antibiotics (10).Compared to the bacterial ribosome, the eukaryotic counterpart is more complicated, containing expansion segments (ES) and variable regions in the rRNA as well as many additional r proteins and r-protein extensions. Plant and fungal 80S ribosomes contain ∼5;500 nucleotides (nts) of rRNA and ∼80 r proteins, whereas bacterial 70S ribosomes comprise ∼4;500 nts and 54 r proteins. The additional elements present in eukaryotic ribosomes may reflect the increased complexity of translation regulation in eukaryotic cells, as evident for assembly, translation initiation, and development, as well as the phenomenon of localized translation (11-15).Early models for eukaryotic ribosomes were derived from electron micrographs of negative-stain or freeze-dried ribosomal particles (16) and localization of r proteins was attempted using immuno-EM and cross-linking approaches; see, for example, refs. 17-20. The first cryo-EM reconstruction of a eukaryotic 80S ribosome was reported for wheat germ (Triticum aestivum) at 38 Å (21). Initial core models for the yeast 80S ribosome were built at 15-Å resolution (22) by docking the rRNA s...

Protein synthesis in all living organisms occurs on ribonucleoprotein particles, called ribosomes. Despite the universality of this process, eukaryotic ribosomes are significantly larger in size than their bacterial counterparts due in part to the presence of 80 r proteins rather than 54 in bacteria. Using cryoelectron microscopy reconstructions of a translating plant (Triticum aestivum) 80S ribosome at 5.5-Å resolution, together with a 6.1-Å map of a translating Saccharomyces cerevisiae 80S ribosome, we have localized and modeled 74∕80 (92.5%) of the ribosomal proteins, encompassing 12 archaeal/eukaryote-specific small subunit proteins as well as the complete complement of the ribosomal proteins of the eukaryotic large subunit. Near-complete atomic models of the 80S ribosome provide insights into the structure, function, and evolution of the eukaryotic translational apparatus.homology modeling | RNA | translation | flexible fitting | molecular dynamics P rotein synthesis occurs on large macromolecular complexes, called ribosomes (1). Ribosomes are composed of two subunits, both of which are built from protein and RNA. Bacterial ribosomes, for example, in Escherichia coli, contain a small subunit composed of one 16S rRNA and 21 ribosomal proteins (r proteins), and a large subunit containing 5S and 23S rRNAs and 33 r proteins. In contrast, eukaryotic ribosomes are much larger and more complex, containing additional RNA in the form of so-called expansion segments (ES) as well as many additional r proteins and r-protein extensions. The additional r proteins present in eukaryotic ribosomes are likely to reflect the increased complexity of translation regulation in eukaryotic cells (2-5). Moreover, many of these eukaryote-specific components have been associated with human disorders (4). Thus, structural insight into the localization of these elements will be important to furthering our understanding of eukaryotic translation regulation as well as disease.Compared with the ∼54 r proteins of the bacterial ribosome, plant and fungal 80S ribosomes contain ∼80 r proteins (see Table S1 for r-protein nomenclature). Crystal structures have revealed the location of each small and large subunit r protein within bacterial ribosomes (6-12) as well as the r proteins within the archaeal large ribosomal subunit (13,14). In contrast, the localization of ribosomal proteins within eukaryotic 80S ribosomes has come mainly from early studies using immuno-EM and cross-linking approaches (see, for example, refs. 15-18). Moreover, the first molecular models for the eukaryotic ribosome were built at 15-Å resolution by docking the structures of the bacterial small 30S subunit (6) and archaeal large 50S subunit (13), thus only identifying the location of a total of 46 eukaryotic r proteins with bacterial or archaeal homologues (19). Recently, cryo-EM reconstructions of plant and fungal 80S ribosomes have led to the localization of three eukaryote-specific r proteins: RACK1 (20) and S19e (21) in the small subunit and L30e in the large subunit...

No abstract

The glutamate mutase dependent on adenosylcobalamin (coenzyme B,J catalyzes the carbon skeleton rearrangement of (S)-glutamate to (2S, 3S)-3-methylaspartate, the first step of the glutamate fermentation pathway of the anaerobic bacterium Clostridium cochlearium. The enzyme consists of two protein components, E, a dimer E~ ( E , 53.5 kDa) and S, a monomer (a, 14.8 ma). The corresponding genes (glmE and glmS) were cloned, sequenced and over-expressed in Escherichia coli. The genes glmS and glmE are separated by glmL encoding a protein of unknown function. The deduced amino acid sequence of GlmL contains an ATP-binding motif which is common to chaperones of the HSP70-type, actin and procaryotic cell-cycle proteins.Both components of glutamate mutase were purified with excellent yields from cell-free extracts of E. coli carrying the corresponding genes. In contrast to component E, component S was shown to bind coenzyme BIZ. This observation strongly supports the idea that significant similarities of the amino acid sequences of component S and several other cobamide-dependent enzymes represent a common binding motif. Incubation of pure components E and S with coenzyme B,, resulted in the formation of a fully active glutamate mutase heterotetramer (~~a~) containing one molecule of coenzyme BIZ.EPR spectra of recombinant glutamate mutase, now available in sufficiently large amounts, were recorded after incubation of the enzyme with coenzyme B,, and (S)-glutamate. The EPR signals (gx, = 2.1, g, = 1.985) were of much better resolution than observed earlier with the clostridial enzyme. Their typical hyperfine splitting is clearly derived from Co(II), which is involved in the formation of the paramagnetic species but is different from cob(I1)alamin (gx,, = 2.25). The spin concentration was 34-50% of the concentration of the enzyme ( E~C T J coenzyme complex. The competitive inhibitors (2S, 4S)-4-fluoroglutamate and 2-methyleneglutarate induced similar but not identical signals with spin concentrations of 134-148% of the enzyme concentration. Even (S)- [2,3,3,4,]glutaate induced a signal significantly different to that of (S)-glutamate with an intensity of only 7 %. These data suggest an involvement of the Co(I1)-containing paramagnetic species in catalysis, the concentration of which reflects a steady state between its formation and decomposition. The large difference in the spin concentrations observed with (S)-glutamate as compared to the perdeuterated glutamate is probably due to a kinetic isotope effect and indicates a cleavage of a C-H bond during formation of the paramagnetic species. It is discussed that the paramagnetic species represents a radical pair composed of Co(I1) and an organic radical.Overnight incubation of glutamate mutase and coenzyme with substrate or one of the competitive inhibitors resulted in an inactive enzyme and cob(II)alamin, which was identified by EPR spectroscopy (gX,, = 2.25). This cob(I1)alamin appeared to be very similar to a cob(I1)amide present in inactive glutamate mutase preparations...

Nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC) is probably the first cytosolic protein to contact nascent polypeptide chains emerging from ribosomes. In this way NAC prevents inappropriate interactions with other factors. Eventually other factors involved in targeting and folding, like the Signal Recognition Particle or cytosolic chaperones, must gain access to the nascent chain. All NAC preparations to date consist of two copurifying polypeptides. Here we rigorously show that these two polypeptides, termed ␣-and ␤NAC, form a very stable complex in vivo and in vitro and that a functional complex can be reconstituted from the individual subunits. A dissection of the contributions of the individual subunits to NACs function revealed that both subunits are in direct contact with nascent polypeptide chains on the ribosome and that both contribute to the prevention of inappropriate interactions. However, ␤NAC alone directly binds to the ribosome and is sufficient to prevent ribosome binding to the endoplasmic reticulum membrane. Nascent polypeptide-associated complex (NAC) 1 is a very abundant cytosolic protein, which is involved in cotranslational targeting of polypeptides to the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane. The intracellular NAC concentration varies only slightly in different tissues, ranging from 3 to 10 M (1). NAC is highly conserved among eukaryotes, but up to now no functional prokaryotic homolog has been described. The importance of NACs in vivo function is emphasized by early embryonically lethal phenotypes of NAC mutants in mice and fruit flies (2, 3). Recently it was also shown that yeast NAC, although not essential for growth (4), is involved in the import of proteins into mitochondria (5, 6).NAC was originally identified as a ribosome-associated protein when we set out to probe the molecular environment of growing polypeptides on the ribosome using a photo-cross-linking approach (7). With this technique we were able to show that NAC can interact with regions of nascent chains as close as 17 amino acids to the peptidyl transferase center. Additionally, it was shown by protease protection that NAC functions as a dissociable wall of a ribosomal tunnel through which the growing polypeptide emerges (8). Cycles of binding and releasing NAC expose the polypeptide to the cytosol in "quantal units" rather than amino acid by amino acid. We have proposed that exposing the polypeptide chain in functional units contributes to fidelity in cotranslational processes such as targeting and folding (9). Depleting NAC from translating ribosomes led to at least two inappropriate interactions. First, the signal recognition particle (SRP), which interacts with signal peptides of nascent chains on ribosomes during targeting to the ER membrane, could be cross-linked to nascent chains lacking signal peptides (7). Second, in the absence of NAC ribosomes translating non-secretory polypeptides inappropriately interacted with translocation sites on ER membranes and the signal-less chains were even translocated, although with l...

No abstract