Background: To develop a deep learning model to classify primary bone tumors from preoperative radiographs and compare performance with radiologists. Methods: A total of 1356 patients (2899 images) with histologically confirmed primary bone tumors and preoperative radiographs were identified from five institutions' pathology databases. Manual cropping was performed by radiologists to label the lesions. Binary discriminatory capacity (benign versus not-benign and malignant versus not-malignant) and three-way classification (benign versus intermediate versus malignant) performance of our model were evaluated. The generalizability of our model was investigated on data from external test set. Final model performance was compared with interpretation from five radiologists of varying level of experience using the Permutations tests. Findings: For benign vs. not benign, model achieved area under curve (AUC) of 0894 and 0877 on cross-validation and external testing, respectively. For malignant vs. not malignant, model achieved AUC of 0907 and 0916 on cross-validation and external testing, respectively. For three-way classification, model achieved 721% accuracy vs. 746% and 721% for the two subspecialists on cross-validation (p = 003 and p = 052, respectively). On external testing, model achieved 734% accuracy vs. 693%, 734%, 731%, 679%, and 634% for the two subspecialists and three junior radiologists (p = 014, p = 089, p = 093, p = 002, p < 001 for radiologists 1À5, respectively). Interpretation: Deep learning can classify primary bone tumors using conventional radiographs in a multiinstitutional dataset with similar accuracy compared to subspecialists, and better performance than junior radiologists.

Background Radiologists have difficulty distinguishing benign from malignant bone lesions because these lesions may have similar imaging appearances. The purpose of this study was to develop a deep learning algorithm that can differentiate benign and malignant bone lesions using routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and patient demographics. Methods 1,060 histologically confirmed bone lesions with T1- and T2-weighted pre-operative MRI were retrospectively identified and included, with lesions from 4 institutions used for model development and internal validation, and data from a fifth institution used for external validation. Image-based models were generated using the EfficientNet-B0 architecture and a logistic regression model was trained using patient age, sex, and lesion location. A voting ensemble was created as the final model. The performance of the model was compared to classification performance by radiology experts. Findings The cohort had a mean age of 30±23 years and was 58.3% male, with 582 benign lesions and 478 malignant. Compared to a contrived expert committee result, the ensemble deep learning model achieved (ensemble vs. experts): similar accuracy (0·76 vs. 0·73, p=0·7), sensitivity (0·79 vs. 0·81, p=1·0) and specificity (0·75 vs. 0·66, p=0·48), with a ROC AUC of 0·82. On external testing, the model achieved ROC AUC of 0·79. Interpretation Deep learning can be used to distinguish benign and malignant bone lesions on par with experts. These findings could aid in the development of computer-aided diagnostic tools to reduce unnecessary referrals to specialized centers from community clinics and limit unnecessary biopsies. Funding This work was funded by a Radiological Society of North America Research Medical Student Grant (#RMS2013) and supported by the Amazon Web Services Diagnostic Development Initiative.

Background The aim of this study was to determine the specific side detection rate of the sentinel lymph node biopsy and the accuracy in predicting lymph node metastasis in early stage cervical cancer. Methods A systematic search of databases was performed from the inception of the databases to 27 June 2020. Studies of cervical cancer patients with FIGO stage FIGO ⅠA~ⅡB, evaluating the sentinel lymph node biopsy with blue dye, technetium 99, combined technique (blue dye with technetium 99) or indocyanine green with a reference standard of systematic pelvis lymph node dissection or clinical follow‐up were included. Stata12.0 and Meta‐Disc 1.4 were used for the meta‐analysis. Results Of 2825 articles found, 21 studies (2234 women) were eventually included. Out of 21 studies, 20 met the detection rate evaluation criteria and six were included for sensitivity meta‐analysis. Due to heterogeneity, it was inappropriate to pool all studies. The pooled specific side detection rates were 85% in tumors up to 2 cm, 67% in tumors over 2 cm, 75.2% for blue dye, 74.7% for technetium 99, 84% for combined technique, and 85.5% for indocyanine green. The sentinel lymph node biopsy had a pooled specific side sensitivity of 88%. Adverse effects of sentinel lymph node biopsy appear minimal for most patients and are mainly related to the injection of blue dye. Conclusions Sentinel lymph node biopsy using a tracer with a high detection rate and ultrastaging is highly accurate and reliable when limited to seriously selected patients, with satisfactory bilateral lymph node mapping and where enough cases for learning curve optimization exist. Indocyanine green sentinel lymph node mapping seems to be a superior sentinel lymph node mapping technique compared to other methods at present.

To explore the role of chronic liver disease (CLD) in COVID-19. A total of 1439 consecutively hospitalized patients with COVID-19 from one large medical center in the United States from March 16, 2020 to April 23, 2020 were retrospectively identified. Clinical characteristics and outcomes were compared between patients with and without CLD. Postmortem examination of liver in 8 critically ill COVID-19 patients was performed. There was no significant difference in the incidence of CLD between critical and non-critical groups (4.1% vs 2.9%, p = 0.259), or COVID-19 related liver injury between patients with and without CLD (65.7% vs 49.7%, p = 0.065). Postmortem examination of liver demonstrated mild liver injury associated central vein outflow obstruction and minimal to moderate portal lymphocytic infiltrate without evidence of CLD. Patients with CLD were not associated with a higher risk of liver injury or critical/fatal outcomes. CLD was not a significant comorbid condition for COVID-19.