Matrix well stimulation by dissolving part of acid soluble materials from the matrix is a proven technique to improve production from carbonate formations. However, acid placement and diversion remains a challenge to the operators, when dealing with heterogeneous formations with zonal permeability contrast. Inefficient acid placement leads to an unsuccessful treatment as most of the injected acid will flow through the high permeability zone, whereas the main target is usually the low permeability layer. Foam-acid diversion is a common practice for acid placement. The success of any foam acid diversion depends highly on the careful selection of suitable surfactant(s) and testing its performance at relevant reservoir conditions.
In this paper, we present a systematic study on surfactant screening, foam-bulk stability, and foam behavior inside the porous medium. Glutamic acid diacetic acid (GLDA) was used as acid. The surfactant screening was performed with an initial list of 29 surfactants at 25°C and 80°C with and without GLDA present in the surfactant formulations. The addition of GLDA resulted in foam collapse for most of the surfactants. However, some bulk-foam stability tests showed improved foamability at 80°C for selected surfactant formulations containing GLDA. Surfactant formulations passing the initial screening were further tested in a 76cm-long high permeability glass beads packed bed. The performance of the selected formulations was next studied in a series of high pressure foam-flooding experiments at 130°C. Foam-quality scan curves were developed to examine the influence of foam quality on foam strength. The mobility reduction factor (MRF) was considered as direct measure of foam strength. Foam coreflood experiments revealed that for most of the formulations comprising cationic surfactants, the foam was most viscous and collapsed at 85% quality.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.