A B S T R A C TPurpose: To evaluate the diagnostic value of computed tomography (CT) and real-time reverse-transcriptasepolymerase chain reaction (rRT-PCR) for COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods: This retrospective study included all patients with COVID-19 pneumonia suspicion, who were examined by both CT and rRT-PCR at initial presentation. The sensitivities of both tests were then compared. For patients with a final confirmed diagnosis, clinical and laboratory data, in addition to CT imaging findings were evaluated. Results: A total of 36 patients were finally diagnosed with COVID-19 pneumonia. Thirty-five patients had abnormal CT findings at presentation, whereas one patient had a normal CT. Using rRT-PCR, 30 patients were tested positive, with 6 cases initially missed. Amongst these 6 patients, 3 became positive in the second rRT-PCR assay(after 2 days, 2 days and 3 days respectively), and the other 3 became positive only in the third round of rRT-PCR tests(after 5 days, 6 days and 8 days respectively). At presentation, CT sensitivity was therefore 97.2%, whereas the sensitivity of initial rRT-PCR was only 83.3%. Conclusion: rRT-PCR may produce initial false negative results. We suggest that patients with typical CT findings but negative rRT-PCR results should be isolated, and rRT-PCR should be repeated to avoid misdiagnosis.

Coronavirus disease is an emerging infection caused by a novel coronavirus that is moving rapidly. High resolution computed tomography (CT) allows objective evaluation of the lung lesions, thus enabling us to better understand the pathogenesis of the disease. With serial CT examinations, the occurrence, development, and prognosis of the disease can be better understood. The imaging can be sorted into four phases: early phase, progressive phase, severe phase, and dissipative phase. The CT appearance of each phase and temporal progression of the imaging findings are demonstrated.

No abstract

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) is a new virus recently isolated from humans. SARS-CoV-2 was discovered to be the pathogen responsible for a cluster of pneumonia associated with severe respiratory disease occurred in December 2019 in China. This novel pulmonary infection, formally called coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has spread rapidly in China and beyond. On 8 March 2020, the number of Italians with SARS-CoV-2 infection was 7375 with a 48% hospitalization rate. At present, chest computed tomography imaging is considered the most effective method for detection of lung abnormalities in early-stage disease and for quantitative assessment of severity and progression of COVID-19 infection. Although chest x-ray (CXR) is considered not sensitive for the detection of pulmonary involvement in the early stage of disease, we believe that, in the current emergency setting, CXR can be a useful diagnostic tool for monitoring the rapid progression of lung abnormalities in infected patients, particularly in intensive care units. In this article we present our experimental CXR scoring system that we are applying in hospitalized patients with COVID-19 pneumonia to quantify and monitor the severity and progression of this new infectious disease. We also present the results of our preliminary validation study on a sample of 100 hospitalized patients with SARS-CoV-2 infection for whom the final outcome (recovery or death) was available.

PURPOSE: To analyze clinical and thin-section computed tomographic (CT) data from the patients with coronavirus disease (COVID-19) to predict the development of pulmonary fibrosis after hospital discharge. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-nine patients (31 males and 28 females ranging from 25 to 70 years old) with confirmed COVID-19 infection performed follow-up thin-section thorax CT. After 31.5±7.9 days (range, 24 to 39 days) of hospital admission, the results of CT were analyzed for parenchymal abnormality (ground-glass opacification, interstitial thickening, and consolidation) and evidence of fibrosis (parenchymal band, traction bronchiectasis, and irregular interfaces). Patients were analyzed based on the evidence of fibrosis and divided into two groups namely, groups A and B (with and without CT evidence of fibrosis), respectively. Patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), rate of intensive care unit (ICU) admission, peak C-reactive protein level, and CT score were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Among the 59 patients, 89.8% (53/59) had a typical transition from early phase to advanced phase and advanced phase to dissipating phase. Also, 39% (23/59) patients developed fibrosis (group A), whereas 61% (36/59) patients did not show definite fibrosis (group B). Patients in group A were older (mean age, 45.4±16.9 vs. 33.8±10.2 years) ( P = 0.001), with longer LOS (19.1±5.2 vs. 15.0±2.5 days) ( P = 0.001), higher rate of ICU admission (21.7% (5/23) vs. 5.6% (2/36)) ( P = 0.061), higher peak C-reactive protein level (30.7±26.4 vs. 18.1±17.9 mg/L) ( P = 0.041), and higher maximal CT score (5.2±4.3 vs. 4.0±2.2) ( P = 0.06) than those in group B. CONCLUSIONS: Pulmonary fibrosis may develop early in patients with COVID-19 after hospital discharge. Older patients with severe illness during treatment were more prone to develop fibrosis according to thin-section CT results.

No abstract

No abstract

This paper develops a two-dimensional (2D) radiomics approach with computed tomography (CT) to differentiate between benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms. A retrospective study was conducted from July 2017 to June 2019 for 134 patients with surgically-verified benign or malignant ovarian tumors. The patients were randomly divided in a ratio of 7:3 into two sets, namely a training set (of n = 95) and a test set (of n = 39). The ITK-SNAP software was used to delineate the regions of interest (ROI) associated with lesions of the largest diameters in plain CT image slices. Texture features were extracted by the Analysis Kit (AK) software. The training set was used to select the best features according to the maximum-relevance minimum-redundancy (mRMR) criterion, in addition to the algorithm of the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO). Then, we employed a radiomics model for classification via multivariate logistic regression. Finally, we evaluated the overall performance of our method using the receiver operating characteristics (ROC), the DeLong test. and tested in an external validation test sample of patients of ovarian neoplasm. We created a radiomics prediction model from 14 selected features. The radiomic signature was found to be highly discriminative according to the area under the ROC curve (AUC) for both the training set (AUC = 0.88), and the test set (AUC = 0.87). The radiomics nomogram also demonstrated good calibration and differentiation for both the training (AUC = 0.95) and test (AUC = 0.96) samples. External validation tests gave a good performance in radiomic signature (AUC = 0.83) and radiomics nomogram (AUC = 0.95). The decision curve explicitly indicated the clinical usefulness of our nomogram method in the sense that it can influence major clinical events such as the ordering or abortion of other tests, treatments or invasive procedures. Our radiomics model based on plain CT images has a high diagnostic efficiency, which is helpful for the identification and prediction of benign and malignant ovarian neoplasms.