No abstract

No abstract

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a heterogeneous disease. B-cell receptor (BCR) pathway is essential for malignant B-cell growth, survival, and proliferation. Various immune cells, including T-cells and macrophages in the tumor microenvironment (TME) contribute to tumor cell survival and pathogenesis of chemo-resistance. The presence of many targets on the malignant B-cells and in the TME has led to emergence of novel therapeutic agents. Stem cell transplant is the oldest treatment modality leveraging immune system in DLBCL. Subsequently, CD20 targeting monoclonal antibody and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy changed the treatment landscape of DLBCL. Recently, multiple novel immunotherapeutic agents have been added in the armamentarium for the management of DLBCL, and many are under development. In this review article, we will review latest updates of immunotherapeutic agents in the management of DLBCL.

A woman, aged 52 years, experienced severe headache, confusion, nausea, dizziness, and diplopia for three days. Magnetic resonance imaging of the brain showed multiple acute and subacute infarcts suggestive of embolic events. Dermatological examination was notable for splinter hemorrhages and macular patches on the fingernails and feet, respectively. Further diagnostic imaging of the chest and abdomen revealed pulmonary emboli and an ovarian mass with omental deposits and splenic infarcts. Fine-needle aspiration cytology and surgery confirmed a diagnosis of high-grade serous adenocarcinoma of the ovary with clear cell features. Extensive evaluation for malignancy should be considered on a case-by-case basis for patients with thromboembolic disease and an initial negative diagnostic evaluation for stroke. Consideration of patent foramen ovale closure is reasonable in patients with malignancy who are at risk for recurrent strokes.

A man, aged 61 years, with a history of hypogonadism and family history of cancer experienced persistent urinary difficulties with no visible prostate abnormalities. Laboratory testing and diagnostic imaging revealed a primary lesion in the prostate with lymph node involvement and multiple bone metastases. Treatment with androgen-deprivation therapy, 17,20-lyase inhibition, and bisphosphonates for 7 months was unsuccessful in preventing disease progression, but second-line chemotherapy and continued androgen-deprivation therapy improved prostate specific antigen levels. During the patient's second treatment regimen, his daughter received a diagnosis of breast cancer. The patient's daughter underwent genetic testing for oncogenic mutations, and it was discovered that she carried a mutation in RAD51C, a gene encoding a protein involved in DNA repair and genomic maintenance. Subsequent genetic testing of the patient revealed mutation in RAD51C as well. For patients with metastatic prostate cancer who are unresponsive to standard treatment and who have a positive family history of cancer, genetic testing may be warranted to develop alternative treatment regimens for the patient and guide family discussions regarding cancer risk. Targeted agents like poly (adenosine diphosphateribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors may be a consideration in prostate cancer patients with DNA repair mutations and with refractory disease.

No abstract

No abstract