The objective of this study was to evaluate treatment distribution and fracture geometry in a multi-stage, multi-cluster fracture completion performed in a horizontal Eagle Ford well. Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) and Distributed Temperature Sensing (DTS) data were acquired on the subject well. The DAS/DTS-observed fracture treatment distributions were then modeled in a three-dimensional fracture model in an effort to visually represent resultant fracture geometries. This process was used to evaluate the impacts on the resulting treatment distributions that occurred as a result of stress-shadowing between fractures. The ultimate goal was to understand the influence that adjacent fractures within a stage and adjacent stages have on fracture distribution, fracture geometry, and completion effectiveness.
DAS/DTS data suggest a high level of interference between adjacent fractures. Interference between adjacent fractures within a given stage, and from adjacent fracture stages, results in a consistent geometric predominance for fracture growth in the most heel-ward perforation cluster. DAS/DTS results also indicate that an excessive number of perforation clusters, spaced closely together, magnify the negative effects of stress shadowing, and potentially diminish completion effectiveness.
Operationally, the DAS/DTS data showed that the surface pressure response originally attributed to downhole diversion from particulate diverters was in fact not due to diversion. Once a dominate fracture was established in a given stage, it remained dominate throughout the entire stage even though two diverter drops per stage were incorporated into the treatment. Finally, the DAS/DTS data indicated that a significant portion (71%) of the stages experienced intra-stage communication. The large majority of this communication was due to plug leakage.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.