The histamine H2 receptor (H2r) belongs to the heptahelical receptor family; upon agonist binding, members of this family activate a G protein and the downstream effector adenylyl cyclase. Like other G protein-coupled receptors, exposure of H2r to agonists produces a desensitization of the response. The present study focused on the desensitization mechanism of this receptor. Using transiently transfected COS-7 cells expressing tagged-H2r, the desensitization induced by amthamine, characterized by decreased cAMP production, was studied. Results show that the receptor was rapidly desensitized with a t(1/2) = 0.49 +/- 0.01 min. Because of the rapid nature of H2r desensitization, receptor phosphorylation was examined as a likely mechanism for signal attenuation. H2r desensitization was not affected by protein kinases A and C (PKA and PKC) inhibitors but was remarkably reduced by Zn(2+), an inhibitor of G protein-coupled receptor kinases (GRKs). Cotransfection experiments using tagged H2r and different GRKs (2, 3, 5, or 6), demonstrated that GRK2 and GRK3 were the most potent in augmenting desensitization, causing a reduction in the maximal response to amthamine and a decrease of the t(1/2) for desensitization, whereas GRK5 and GRK6 did not affect the signaling. Receptor phosphorylation correlates with desensitization for each GRK studied, whereas phosphorylation that is dependent on protein kinases A and C seemed irrelevant in receptor signal termination. These results indicate that in H2r-transfected COS-7 cells, exposure to an agonist caused desensitization controlled by H2r phosphorylation via GRK2 and GRK3.

We examined the effects of histamine and its agonists on the expression of the c-fos and c-myc proto-oncogenes at the transcriptional and translational levels in the human promonocytic U937 cell line. Histamine transiently increased cAMP and c-fos expression through H2 receptors. Dibutyryl cAMP also increased c-fos mRNA and protein, and levels remained elevated even after 12 hr of treatment. Dose-dependence studies using histamine and dimaprit showed that the EC50 values for cAMP production and c-fos increase were similar, suggesting that cAMP might be involved in c-fos induction via H2 receptors. Furthermore, studies carried out using H7, a protein kinase A/protein kinase C inhibitor, blocked c-fos induction, whereas no effect was observed with bisindolylmaleimide, a specific protein kinase C inhibitor. No modification of c-myc expression could be detected on treatment with histamine or its analogues. Nevertheless, dibutyryl cAMP induced a down-regulation of the levels of this proto-oncogene. In addition, dibutyryl cAMP inhibited cell growth in a dose-dependent manner, whereas histamine failed to affect proliferation and differentiation of U937 cells. Cells pretreated with dimaprit showed a decrease in the cAMP response to subsequent addition of H2 agonists, whereas the cAMP response to prostaglandin E2 remained unaltered. This homologous mechanism of H2 receptor desensitization was time dependent. These results indicate that histamine activates several mechanisms involved in the induction of differentiation, such as cAMP and c-fos production, but fails to promote differentiation of U937 cells, apparently due to the rapid desensitization of H2 receptors.

Knowing the importance for research and pharmacological uses of proper ligand classification into agonists, inverse agonists, and antagonists, the aim of this work was to study the behavior of tiotidine, a controversial histamine H2 receptor ligand. We found that tiotidine, described previously as an H2 antagonist, actually behaves as an inverse agonist in U-937 cells, diminishing basal cAMP levels. [3 H]Tiotidine showed two binding sites, one with high affinity and low capacity and the other with low affinity and high capacity. The former site disappeared in the presence of guanosine 5Ј-O-(3-thio)triphosphate, indicating that it belongs to a subset of receptors coupled to G-protein, showing the classic binding profile for an agonist. Considering the occupancy models developed up to now, the only one that explains tiotidine dual behavior is the cubic ternary complex (CTC) model. This model allows Gprotein to interact with the receptor even in the inactive state. We showed by theoretical simulations based on the CTC model of dose-response and binding experiments that tiotidine biases the system to a G-protein-coupled form of the receptor that is unable to evoke a response. This theoretical approach was supported by experimental results in which an unrelated Gprotein-coupled receptor that also signals through G␣ s -protein (␤ 2 -adrenoreceptor) was impeded by tiotidine. This interference clearly implies that tiotidine biases the system to G␣ s -coupled form of the H2 receptor and turns G␣ s -protein less available to interact with ␤ 2 -adrenoreceptor. These findings not only show that tiotidine is an H2 inverse agonist in U-937 cells but also provide experimental support for the CTC model.Receptors coupled to G-proteins (GPCRs) play a major role in signal transduction and are the targets for a large number of therapeutic drugs. Although much is known about signal transduction pathways, the mechanism by which ligands bind to and activate GPCRs remains unclear. In an attempt to understand such mechanisms, several occupancy models have been developed. The first theoretical model of receptor function that included G-proteins was the ternary complex model of De Léan et al. (1980) in which the receptor possesses two binding sites, one for the ligand on the extracellular side and other for the G-protein in the intracellular side. This model is a generalization of former models, in which only the free receptor and the receptor ligand complex existed, allowing

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract