The phase separation of poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) (PDEA) gel network in water/alcohol (methanol, ethanol, isopropanol, and n-propanol) mixtures has been systematically investigated by variable-temperature highresolution 1 H MAS NMR. The PDEA gel exhibits the cononsolvency effect and reentrant phase transition in water/isopropanol and water/n-propanol mixtures with larger alcohol hydrophobic groups but not in the water/methanol and water/ethanol bearing smaller alcohol hydrophobic groups, in contrast to the case of poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) where the cononsolvency effect was observed in all water/ alcohol solutions. In the present PDEA gel, the phase separation is characterized by dehydration of the hydrophobic alkyl groups of PDEA, resulting in two distinct types of water/alcohol solutions above the lower critical solution temperature: confined binary solvents (3−5 solvent molecules per PDEA repeating unit) inside the gel network and free binary solvents outside the gel. The alcohol concentration in confined mixture solvents is markedly higher than that in free mixture solvents and increases with increasing hydrophobicity of the alcohol moiety. Interestingly, the alcohol enrichment inside the shrunk network does not cause additional dehydration of the PDEA network. Besides, the side chain mobility of shrunk PDEA gel network is enhanced by the appearance of alcohol and increases with the hydrophobicity of alcohol moiety. Our results reveal that there exists a strong interaction between alcohol and gel network.

spectroscopy has been applied to study the urea effect on phase transition of two similar thermosensitive polymer hydrogels: poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) (PNIPAM) and poly(N,N-diethylacrylamide) (PDEA). It is found that urea influences the phase transition of the hydrogels in opposite ways: lowering the lower critical solution temperature (LCST) of PNIPAM and hence stabilizing its globular structure, whereas raising the LCST of PDEA and destabilizing the globular structure. The selfdiffusion coefficient and urea−polymer nuclear Overhauser effect (NOE) measurement reveal that urea has a stronger interaction with PNIPAM than with PDEA. Moreover, the enhanced positive water−PNIPAM NOE suggests that urea not only interacts directly with PNIPAM via hydrogen bond but also intensifies the hydrogen bonding interaction between water and PNIPAM. We suggest that different urea−polymer hydrogen bonding interaction due to the presence or absence of amide hydrogen is correlated with the distinct LCST variation of PNIPAM and PDEA.