No abstract

Background: Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) guidelines suggest 7-14 days' duration of antibiotic treatment for uncomplicated Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) catheter-related bloodstream infection (CRBSI). The objectives of this study were to review microbial epidemiology, to determine rate and risk factors for relapse, and to compare clinical outcomes in patients receiving long-versus short-duration antibiotic therapy. Methods: A retrospective phase 1 study was conducted between January 2010 and October 2016 to review microbial epidemiology and to determine the incidence of and risk factors for relapse in patients with GNB CRBSI, according to the IDSA guidelines diagnostic criteria. In phase 2 of the study, patients without risk factors for relapse between November 2016 and October 2017 were prospectively recruited to receive antibiotic therapy for 7 days after catheter removal. Matched patients from the retrospective phase 1 study who had received antibiotic therapy for ≥14 days were selected as a phase 2 control group to compare outcomes. Results: In phase 1, three most common pathogens identified among 174 cases were Pseudomonas aeruginosa (22.0%), Klebsiella pneumoniae (16.7%), and Stenotrophomonas maltophilia (13.4%). Eighty-nine episodes of infection occurred while patients were receiving antibiotic therapy. Of 140 cases, the relapse rate was 6.4%. Catheter retention was the only risk factor strongly associated with relapse (odds ratio = 145.32; 95% confidence interval 12.66-1667.37, P < 0.001). In phase 2, 11 patients with catheter removal were prospectively recruited to receive short-duration therapy. The number of patients with relapse receiving long-or short-duration therapy was 1 (3%) and 0 (0%), respectively (P = 1.000).

Objective. In a setting with a limited capacity for hospitalization, “hospitels” have been developed by using hotels as extension healthcare facilities for patients with mild illness. This study examined the clinical evidence of patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) who were treated with favipiravir, the main medication for treating COVID-19, in the hospitel setting in Thailand. Methods. We retrospectively collected demographic and clinical information, medication treatment, and outcome data for all patients who received favipiravir for COVID-19 during admission to a hospitel from April 27, 2021, to July 2, 2021. Risk factors for adults who could not complete treatment in a hospitel and who required hospitel transfer were analyzed. Results. In total, 421 patients were included in the study. Most patients (94.5%) received favipiravir to treat COVID-19 pneumonia. Adjunctive corticosteroids were prescribed to 42.3% of patients. Concerning the treatment outcome, 83.6% of patients completed treatment at a hospitel, and only two deaths occurred. No serious adverse drug reactions were observed. On multivariate analysis, age (odds ratio (OR) = 1.06; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.02–1.10, P = 0.002 ), dyspnea (OR = 2.84; 95% CI = 1.25–6.44, P = 0.013 ), loss of taste (OR = 107.63; 95% CI = 1.24–9337.39, P = 0.040 ), corticosteroid use (OR = 12.56; 95% CI = 3.65–43.18, P < 0.001 ), and an extended duration of favipiravir use (OR = 16.91; 95% CI = 7.29–39.24, P < 0.001 ) were associated with a higher risk of hospitel transfer. Conclusions. Low rates of hospitel transfer and mortality were observed in mild-to-moderate COVID-19 patients treated with favipiravir at hospitel. Caution might be required in elderly patients, patients with dyspnea or a loss of taste, and patients receiving a 10-day course of favipiravir or adjunctive corticosteroids because these patients might require further management in the hospitel.