Background Postoperative analgesia in laparoscopic cholecystectomy significantly affects the ambulation and discharge of the patient. This study compares fentanyl and dexmedetomidine as adjuvants to bupivacaine in intraperitoneal instillation after LC, in terms of their impact on ambulation, analgesic efficacy and recovery profile. Ninety patients were randomised into three groups with thirty patients in each group; group BF was administered 20 ml of 2 μg/kg fentanyl + 0.25% bupivacaine, group BD received 20 ml of 1μg/kg dexmedetomidine + 0.25% bupivacaine and group B received 20 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine only. After 8 h, Post-Anaesthesia Discharge Scoring System (PADS) scored for determining home readiness. Analgesic profile was assessed using Verbal Rating Scale and rescue analgesia requirement seen. Sedation was scored using Ramsay sedation scoring. Results Group B had significantly higher VRS and rescue analgesia requirements whilst groups BF and BD had a similar analgesic profile. Ramsay sedation scores were significantly higher in group BD when compared to groups BF and B. However, the PADS score remained comparable in all three groups (P = 0.113). The trial was retrospectively registered with the clinical trial registry of India CTRI/2019/07/020466. Conclusion Intraperitoneal instillation of bupivacaine in combination with dexmedetomidine or fentanyl significantly reduces postoperative pain scores in comparison to bupivacaine alone, in patients undergoing ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy. However, fentanyl may be preferred over dexmedetomidine, because it causes less sedation and achieves a better PADS score.

Background:Intravenous regional anesthesia (IVRA) is safe, technically simple, and cost-effective technique compared to general anesthesia with success rates of 94–98% for upper and lower limb surgeries. The main disadvantage of this procedure is its limited duration for surgery, lack of postoperative analgesia, and tourniquet pain. To overcome this disadvantage, various adjuvants to lignocaine have been studied from time to time.Aim:To compare the analgesic efficacy of dexmedetomidine and midazolam as adjuncts to lignocaine for IVRA for forearm and hand surgeries.Setting and Design:The study was conducted by the Department of Anaesthesia of Medical College and patients posted for elective as well as the emergency forearm and hand surgeries were included in the study. It was a prospective comparative study.Materials and Methods:Sixty patients of either sex belonging to the American Society of Anesthesiologists Class I and II, in the age range of 18–65 years, scheduled for upper limb orthopedic surgery, either elective or emergency, were included in the study. All patients were administered IVRA in this prospective, double-blind, randomized study. Patients enrolled in the study were randomly divided into two groups of thirty each. Group M-received 40 ml of 0.5% lignocaine with midazolam 50 μg/kg and Group D-received 40 ml of 0.5% lignocaine with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg. Time of onset of sensory block, duration of analgesia, total dose of fentanyl given, intraoperative blood pressure, oxygen saturation, heart rate, postoperative analgesia, and adverse effects were recorded and compared between the groups.Statistical Analysis Used:The statistical evaluation was performed using SPSS version 17.0 software. All values were calculated with a 95% confidence interval. The parameters were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and t-test was used for comparing demographic and clinical data. For comparisons, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results:Mean duration of analgesia was 93 ± 28 min in dexmedetomidine group and 84 ± 28 min in midazolam group, and onset of sensory block was comparable in both groups.Conclusion:Dexmedetomidine and midazolam, when used as adjuvants to lignocaine for IVRA, significantly improve the intraoperative conditions by providing superior quality of block. The superiority of one over the other could not be established as midazolam produced the early onset of block and less requirement of fentanyl, whereas dexmedetomidine when added to IVRA provided longer duration of analgesia (93 ± 28 min) in comparison to midazolam (84 ± 28 min).

Hadoop is an open source Apache project and a software framework for distributed processing of large datasets across large clusters of computers with commodity hardware. Large datasets include terabytes or petabytes of data where as large clusters means hundreds or thousands of nodes. It supports master slave architecture, which involves one master node and thousands of slave nodes. NameNode acts as the master node which stores all the metadata of files and various data nodes are slave nodes which stores all the application data. It becomes a bottleneck, when there is a need to process numerous number of small files because the NameNode utilizes the more memory to store the metadata of files and data nodes consume more CPU time to process numerous number of small files. This paper presents a novel technique to handle small file problems with Hadoop technology based on file merging, caching and correlation strategies. The experimental results shows that the proposed technique reduces the amount of data storage at NameNode, average memory usage of DataNodes and improves the access efficiency of small files in Hadoop Distributed File System up to 88.57% as compared with the general solution Hadoop Archive. General TermsBig Data Analytics, Small files in Hadoop. KeywordsHadoop, HDFS, Map Reduce, small files in Hadoop, small files storage in Hadoop.

Heterotopic pregnancy is defined as the coexistence of intrauterine and extrauterine gestation. The incidence is low and estimated to be 1 in 30,000 of spontaneous pregnancies though it is becoming commoner with assisted reproductive technique. It can be a life-threatening condition and can be easily missed with the diagnosis being overlooked. We present a rare case of spontaneous heterotopic pregnancy with live intrauterine gestation and ruptured left adnexal gestation.

No abstract

No abstract

Vamana Karma (therapeutic emesis) primarily a Samshodhana Karma (purification procedure) is one of the five Pradhana Karmas (chief procedures) of Panchakarma. It is mentioned in Ayurvedic texts that a person after Samyak Vamana (proper Vamana) experiences lightness of the body, Hrit (precordium), Kantha (throat/voice), and Shirah (head) and weakness. This procedure is effectively used in healthy and ailing persons for purification of body and extraction of Doshas (especially Kapha) in Ayurvedic system. It has been found worth to observe the physiological and biochemical changes during Vamana and after the procedure to understand the effect/safety margins of the procedure in healthy volunteers.

Vamana Karma is one of the five Pradhana Karmas of Panchakarma which is successfully used in treating Kaphaj disorders. Panchakarma is also indicated in healthy states. (C.Su. 16/13-16) for Shodhana. Textual references are available in Ayurvedic classics, but the procedure needs to be validated in the modern times when Ahara Shakti, Bala and Agni of the individuals have decreased considerably. So the effect of procedure was observed in 30 healthy volunteers of age group 18 to 60 years. Lakshanik, Vaigiki, Maniki and Antiki Shuddhi were observed and vomitus was analyzed macroscopically, microscopically and chemically.