The efficacy of a metacognitive instructional strategy for use with basal readers in improving reading comprehension, strategy use, and attitude toward reading was investigated. Thirty-one children in two fourth-grade classrooms served as subjects in the experiment. Twenty students in a self-contained classroom served as the treatment group while eleven students in a second self-contained classroom served as the control. All subjects in both groups were administered the Metropolitan Achievement Test, Reading Attitude Inventory, and the Index of Reading Awareness in September prior to the treatment and again at the end of the treatment the following May. The experimental treatment was based on the instructional strategies proposed by Schmitt and Baumann (1986) that describe how teachers can incorporate the use of comprehension monitoring strategies into the guided reading phase of basal reader instruction. Results indicated that children can be taught how to use metacognitive reading strategies and techniques during basal reader instruction. Average fourth-grade readers who received metacognitive skills training had greater reading comprehension, greater knowledge about reading strategies, and more positive attitudes toward reading than children in the control group.
Test anxiety scores from a 15-item internally consistent instrument (r,, = .73) were correlated with performances on an aggregate science test made up of items administered over an entire school year. Samples of 171 fourth-grade and 187 eighth-grade students were subdivided by sex and race. A tendency was noted for the magnitude of correlations to be (a) higher in grade eight than in grade four, (b) positive for blacks but negative for whites, and (c) about the same for males and females. The data are interpreted as possibly suggesting that test anxiety is operating differentially for black and white students. Implications for the making of interpretations of achievement test behavior are discussed.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.