Purpose The aim of the present paper is to review the role of HER2 antibodies, affibodies and nanobodies as vehicles for imaging and therapy approaches in breast cancer, including a detailed look at recent clinical data from antibody drug conjugates and nanobodies as well as affibodies that are currently under development. Results Clinical and preclinical studies have shown that the use of monoclonal antibodies in molecular imaging is impaired by slow blood clearance, associated with slow and low tumor uptake and with limited tumor penetration potential. Antibody fragments, such as nanobodies, on the other hand, can be radiolabelled with short-lived radioisotopes and provide high-contrast images within a few hours after injection, allowing early diagnosis and reduced radiation exposure of patients. Even in therapy, the small radioactively labeled nanobodies prove to be superior to radioactively labeled monoclonal antibodies due to their higher specificity and their ability to penetrate the tumor. Conclusion While monoclonal antibodies are well established drug delivery vehicles, the current literature on molecular imaging supports the notion that antibody fragments, such as affibodies or nanobodies, might be superior in this approach.

The expression status of human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) in cancer predicts response to HER2-targeted therapy. Therefore, its accurate determination is of utmost importance. In recent years, there has been an increase in research on noninvasive techniques for molecular imaging, as this method offers the advantages of a more accurate determination of HER2 status without the need for multiple biopsies. The technetium-labeled single-domain antibody RAD201, previously known as 99mTc-NM-02, has been shown to be safe for use in breast cancer imaging with reasonable radiation doses, favorable biodistribution, and imaging characteristics. Methods A total of six HER2-positive, heavily pretreated patients with different cancer types aged between 42 and 69 years (5 women and 1 man; the median age of 55.5) have been examined. In six of seven scans, the patients were administered 500 ml of Gelofusine® solution (40 mg/ml) for radiation protection before the tracer injection (434 ± 42 MBq). Planar scans were acquired with the patient supine at 10 min, 60 min, 160 min, 20 h, and 24 h after injection. A CT scan was acquired at 95 min, followed by local tomographic SPECT imaging. Results One patient was scanned twice with RAD201, 3 months apart, resulting in a total of seven scans for six patients. Here, we show that the use of RAD201 in our patient group shows the same favorable biodistribution as in a previous study with RAD201 (NCT04040686) and that the radiation dose to the critical organ kidney can be reduced by the application of the plasma expander Gelofusine® by almost 50%. Conclusion RAD201 appears safe for use in humans and is a promising noninvasive tool for discriminating HER2 status in metastatic (breast) cancer, regardless of ongoing HER2-targeted antibody treatment.

No abstract