Résumé -Effets des expériences d'enquêtes sur les attitudes des répondants envers des enquêtes: Dans cet article, nous analysons si et comment les évaluations des répondants de leurs expériences précédentes d'interview influencent leur attitude envers les enquêtes. En particulier, nous comparons l'importance relative de trois dimensions indépendantes: le charge de la participation & a g r a v e ; un interview, la valeur de "divertissement" de l'interview et l'agacement dû & a g r a v e ; des questions mal posées. Un premier résultat est que le mode de passation du dernier interview est un déterminant significatif de l'évaluation en général des enquêtes. Le deuxième et plus important résultats est que l'importance du charge ressenti lors du dernier interview --et non pas les autres dimensions --a un effet significatif dans l'attitude générale envers des enquêtes. De plus, l'association entre le charge subjectif et l'attitude envers des enquêtes est influencée par l'accessibilité cognitive des ces évaluations mesurées par les latences de réponse. Donc, les instances plus accessibles cognitivement et plus saillantes d'expériences d'interviews trop chargés, sont particulièrement importantes dans la formation de l'attitude des répondants, et ainsi influencent très probablement la coopération dans de futures enquêAbstract: In the following article we analyze whether or not and to what extent respondents' evaluations of past interview experiences affect their generalized attitudes towards surveys. In particular, our study compares the relative significance of three orthogonal evaluation dimensions: the burden caused by interview participation, the "entertainment value" of an interview and the irritation due to confusing question wording. As a first result, the mode of administration of the last interview proved to be a significant predictor of the evaluation of surveys in general. The second and most important finding is that the burden experienced during the last interview, but not the other evaluation dimensions, has a significant effect on the generalized evaluation of surveys. In addition, the association between the subjective burden and survey attitudes is found to be conditioned by the cognitive accessibility o f these e valuations, as measured by response latencies. Thus, cognitively more accessible and more salient instances of burdensome interview experiences are especially relevant for the respondents' attitudes, and therefore influence most likely cooperation in future surveys.
A broad understanding of food systems includes a complex web of activities, outcomes and drivers, encompassing not only the food and agriculture sectors, but also the social norms and cultures in which those activities are embedded. The organic food and farming movement has lately been portrayed as a food system of its own right, since it contains all necessary sub-systems, consisting of food environments, distribution networks, processing, as well as production and supply, all of which are bounded by an organic guarantee system. The underlying hypothesis of this investigation is that drivers in the organic food system operate on a paradigm level that is associated with the codified principles of ecology, health, fairness and care. Personality science suggests that the choice to act in pro-environmental ways is driven by an internalized sense of obligation or personal norms, which justifies our pursuit of seeking key drivers of food systems in the mindset of the actor. Through integrated findings from actor-centered mixed methods grounded theory research involving eleven case territories, this study identified a pattern of global mindset attributes that intuitively drive organic food system actors toward holistic human and sustainable development.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.