PurposeDual‐energy computed tomography (DECT) using TwinBeam CT (TBCT) is a new option for radiation oncology simulators. TBCT scanning provides virtual monoenergetic images which are attractive in treatment planning since lower energies offer better contrast for soft tissues, and higher energies reduce noise. A protocol is needed to achieve optimal performance of this feature. In this study, we investigated the TBCT scan schema with the head‐and‐neck radiotherapy workflow at our clinic and selected the optimal energy with best contrast‐noise‐ratio (CNR) in organs‐at‐risks (OARs) delineation for head‐and‐neck treatment planning.Methods and materialsWe synthesized monochromatic images from 40 keV to 190 keV at 5 keV increments from data acquired by TBCT. We collected the Hounsfield unit (HU) numbers of OARs (brainstem, mandible, spinal cord, and parotid glands), the HU numbers of marginal regions outside OARs, and the noise levels for each monochromatic image. We then calculated the CNR for the different OARs at each energy level to generate a serial of spectral curves for each OAR. Based on these spectral curves of CNR, the mono‐energy corresponding to the max CNR was identified for each OAR of each patient.ResultsComputed tomography scans of ten patients by TBCT were used to test the optimal monoenergetic image for the CNR of OAR. Based on the maximized CNR, the optimal energy values were 78.5 ± 5.3 keV for the brainstem, 78.0 ± 4.2 keV for the mandible, 78.5 ± 5.7 keV for the parotid glands, and 78.5 ± 5.3 keV for the spinal cord. Overall, the optimal energy for the maximum CNR of these OARs in head‐and‐neck cancer patients was 80 keV.ConclusionWe have proposed a clinically feasible protocol that selects the optimal energy level of the virtual monoenergetic image in TBCT for OAR delineation based on the CNR in head‐and‐neck OAR. This protocol can be applied in TBCT simulation.

In intensity-modulated proton therapy (IMPT), protons are used to deliver highly conformal dose distributions, targeting tumors, and sparing organs-at-risk. However, due to uncertainties in both patient setup and relative stopping power (RSP) calculation, margins are added to the treatment volume during treatment planning, leading to higher doses to normal tissues. Cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) images are taken daily before treatment; however, the poor image quality of CBCT limits the use of these images for online dose calculation. In this work, we use a deep-learning-based method to predict RSP maps from daily CBCT images, allowing for online dose calculation in a step toward adaptive radiation therapy. Methods: Twenty-three head-and-neck cancer patients were simulated using a Siemens TwinBeam dual-energy CT (DECT) scanner. Mixed-energy scans (equivalent to a 120 kVp single-energy CT scan) were converted to RSP maps for treatment planning. Cone-beam computed tomography images were taken on the first day of treatment, and the planning RSP maps were registered to these images. A deep learning network based on a cycle-GAN architecture, relying on a compound loss function designed for structural and contrast preservation, was then trained to create an RSP map from a CBCT image. Leave-one-out and holdout cross validations were used for evaluation, and mean absolute error (MAE), mean error (ME), peak signal-to-noise ratio (PSNR), and structural similarity (SSIM) were used to quantify the differences between the CT-based and CBCT-based RSP maps. The proposed method was compared to a deformable image registration-based method which was taken as the ground truth and two other deep learning methods. For one patient who underwent resimulation, the new planning RSP maps and CBCT images were used for further evaluation and validation. Results: The CBCT-based RSP generation method was evaluated on 23 head-and-neck cancer patients. From leave-one-out testing, the MAE between CT-based and CBCT-based RSP was 0.06 AE 0.01 and the ME was −0.01 AE 0.01. The proposed method statistically outperformed the comparison DL methods in terms of MAE and ME when compared to the planning CT. In terms of dose comparison, the mean gamma passing rate at 3%/3 mm was 94% when three-dimensional (3D) gamma index was calculated per plan and 96% when gamma index was calculated per field. Conclusions: The proposed method provides sufficiently accurate RSP map generation from CBCT images, allowing for evaluation of daily dose based on CBCT and possibly allowing for CBCTguided adaptive treatment planning for IMPT.

Objective: Dual energy CT (DECT) has been shown to estimate stopping power ratio (SPR) map with a higher accuracy than conventional single energy CT (SECT) by obtaining the energy dependence of photon interactions. This work presents a learning-based method to synthesize DECT images from SECT image for proton radiotherapy. Methods: The proposed method uses a residual attention generative adversarial network. Residual blocks with attention gates were used to force the model to focus on the difference between DECT images and SECT images. To evaluate the accuracy of the method, we retrospectively investigated 70 head-and-neck cancer patients whose DECT and SECT scans were acquired simultaneously. The model was trained to generate both a high and low energy DECT image based on a SECT image. The generated synthetic low and high DECT images were evaluated against the true DECT images using leave-one-out cross-validation. To evaluate our method in the context of a practical application, we generated SPR maps from synthetic DECT (sDECT) using a dual-energy based stoichiometric method and compared the SPR maps to those generated from DECT. A dosimetric comparison for dose obtained from DECT was performed against that derived from sDECT. Results: The mean of mean absolute error, peak signal-to-noise ratio and normalized cross-correlation for the synthetic high and low energy CT images was 36.9 HU, 29.3 dB, 0.96 and 35.8 HU, 29.2 dB, and 0.96, respectively. The corresponding SPR maps generated from synthetic DECT showed an average normalized mean square deviation of about 1% with reduced noise level and artifacts than those from original DECT. Dose–volume histogram (DVH) metrics for the clinical target volume agree within 1% between the DECT and sDECT calculated dose. Conclusion: Our method synthesized accurate DECT images and showed a potential feasibility for proton SPR map generation. Advances in knowledge: This study investigated a learning-based method to synthesize DECT images from SECT image for proton radiotherapy.

Purpose Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has been used to derive relative stopping power (RSP) maps by obtaining the energy dependence of photon interactions. The DECT-derived RSP maps could potentially be compromised by image noise levels and the severity of artifacts when using physics-based mapping techniques. This work presents a noise-robust learning-based method to predict RSP maps from DECT for proton radiation therapy. Materials and Methods The proposed method uses a residual attention cycle-consistent generative adversarial network to bring DECT-to-RSP mapping close to a 1-to-1 mapping by introducing an inverse RSP-to-DECT mapping. To evaluate the proposed method, we retrospectively investigated 20 head-and-neck cancer patients with DECT scans in proton radiation therapy simulation. Ground truth RSP values were assigned by calculation based on chemical compositions and acted as learning targets in the training process for DECT datasets; they were evaluated against results from the proposed method using a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy. Results The predicted RSP maps showed an average normalized mean square error of 2.83% across the whole body volume and an average mean error less than 3% in all volumes of interest. With additional simulated noise added in DECT datasets, the proposed method still maintained a comparable performance, while the physics-based stoichiometric method suffered degraded inaccuracy from increased noise level. The average differences from ground truth in dose volume histogram metrics for clinical target volumes were less than 0.2 Gy for D95% and Dmax with no statistical significance. Maximum difference in dose volume histogram metrics of organs at risk was around 1 Gy on average. Conclusion These results strongly indicate the high accuracy of RSP maps predicted by our machine-learning–based method and show its potential feasibility for proton treatment planning and dose calculation.

Organ delineation is crucial to diagnosis and therapy, while it is also labor-intensive and observer-dependent. Dual energy CT (DECT) provides additional image contrast than conventional single energy CT (SECT), which may facilitate automatic organ segmentation. This work aims to develop an automatic multi-organ segmentation approach using deep learning for head-and-neck region on DECT. We proposed a mask scoring regional convolutional neural network (R-CNN) where comprehensive features are firstly learnt from two independent pyramid networks and are then combined via deep attention strategy to highlight the informative ones extracted from both two channels of low and high energy CT. To perform multi-organ segmentation and avoid misclassification, a mask scoring subnetwork was integrated into the Mask R-CNN framework to build the correlation between the class of potential detected organ’s region-of-interest (ROI) and the shape of that organ’s segmentation within that ROI. We evaluated our model on DECT images from 127 head-and-neck cancer patients (66 training, 61 testing) with manual contours of 19 organs as training target and ground truth. For large- and mid-sized organs such as brain and parotid, the proposed method successfully achieved average Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) larger than 0.8. For small-sized organs with very low contrast such as chiasm, cochlea, lens and optic nerves, the DSCs ranged between around 0.5 and 0.8. With the proposed method, using DECT images outperforms using SECT in almost all 19 organs with statistical significance in DSC (p<0.05). Meanwhile, by using the DECT, the proposed method is also significantly superior to a recently developed FCN-based method in most of organs in terms of DSC and the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance. Quantitative results demonstrated the feasibility of the proposed method, the superiority of using DECT to SECT, and the advantage of the proposed R-CNN over FCN on the head-and-neck patient study. The proposed method has the potential to facilitate the current head-and-neck cancer radiation therapy workflow in treatment planning.