Background: A large proportion of patients with a SARS-Cov-2-associated respiratory failure develop an acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS). It has been recently suggested that SARS-Cov-2-associated ARDS may differ from usual non-SARS-Cov-2-associated ARDS by higher respiratory system compliance (C RS ), lower potential for recruitment with positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) contrasting with severe shunt fraction. The purpose of the study was to systematically assess respiratory mechanics and recruitability in SARS-Cov-2-associated ARDS. Methods:Gas exchanges, C RS and hemodynamics were assessed at 2 levels of PEEP (15 cmH 2 O and 5 cmH 2 O) within 36 h (day1) and from 4 to 6 days (day 5) after intubation. The recruited volume was computed as the difference between the volume expired from PEEP 15 to 5 cmH 2 O and the volume predicted by compliance at PEEP 5 cmH 2 O (or above airway opening pressure). The recruitment-to-inflation (R/I) ratio (i.e. the ratio between the recruited lung compliance and C RS at PEEP 5 cmH 2 O) was used to assess lung recruitability. A R/I ratio value higher than or equal to 0.5 was used to define highly recruitable patients. Results:The R/I ratio was calculated in 25 of the 26 enrolled patients at day 1 and in 15 patients at day 5. At day 1, 16 (64%) were considered as highly recruitable (R/I ratio median [interquartile range] 0.7 [0.55-0.94]) and 9 (36%) were considered as poorly recruitable (R/I ratio 0.41 [0.31-0.48]). The PaO 2 /FiO 2 ratio at PEEP 15 cmH 2 O was higher compared to PEEP 5 cmH 2 O only in highly recruitable patients (173 [139-236] vs 135 [89-167] mmHg; p < 0.01). Neither PaO 2 /FiO 2 or C RS measured at PEEP 15 cmH 2 O or at PEEP 5 cmH 2 O nor changes in PaO 2 /FiO 2 or C RS in response to PEEP changes allowed to identify highly or poorly recruitable patients. Conclusion:In this series of 25 patients with SARS-Cov-2 associated ARDS, 64% were considered as highly recruitable and only 36% as poorly recruitable based on the R/I ratio performed on the day of intubation. This observation suggests that a systematic R/I ratio assessment may help to guide initial PEEP titration to limit harmful effect of unnecessary high PEEP in the context of Covid-19 crisis.

OBJECTIVES: Prone positioning allows to improve oxygenation and decrease mortality rate in COVID-19–associated acute respiratory distress syndrome (C-ARDS). However, the mechanisms leading to these effects are not fully understood. The aim of this study is to assess the physiologic effects of pronation by the means of CT scan and electrical impedance tomography (EIT). DESIGN: Experimental, physiologic study. SETTING: Patients were enrolled from October 2020 to March 2021 in an Italian dedicated COVID-19 ICU. PATIENTS: Twenty-one intubated patients with moderate or severe C-ARDS. INTERVENTIONS: First, patients were transported to the CT scan facility, and image acquisition was performed in prone, then supine position. Back to the ICU, gas exchange, respiratory mechanics, and ventilation and perfusion EIT-based analysis were provided toward the end of two 30 minutes steps (e.g., in supine, then prone position). MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Prone position induced recruitment in the dorsal part of the lungs (12.5% ± 8.0%; p < 0.001 from baseline) and derecruitment in the ventral regions (–6.9% ± 5.2%; p < 0.001). These changes led to a global increase in recruitment (6.0% ± 6.7%; p < 0.001). Respiratory system compliance did not change with prone position (45 ± 15 vs 45 ± 18 mL/cm H 2 O in supine and prone position, respectively; p = 0.957) suggesting a decrease in atelectrauma. This hypothesis was supported by the decrease of a time-impedance curve concavity index designed as a surrogate for atelectrauma (1.41 ± 0.16 vs 1.30 ± 0.16; p = 0.001). Dead space measured by EIT was reduced in the ventral regions of the lungs, and the dead-space/shunt ratio decreased significantly (5.1 [2.3–23.4] vs 4.3 [0.7–6.8]; p = 0.035), showing an improvement in ventilation-perfusion matching. CONCLUSIONS: Several changes are associated with prone position in C-ARDS: increased lung recruitment, decreased atelectrauma, and improved ventilation-perfusion matching. These physiologic effects may be associated with more protective ventilation.

Background Differences in physiology of ARDS have been described between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients. This study aimed to compare initial values and longitudinal changes in respiratory system compliance (CRS), oxygenation parameters and ventilatory ratio (VR) in patients with COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pulmonary ARDS matched on oxygenation. Methods 135 patients with COVID-19 ARDS from two centers were included in a physiological study; 767 non-COVID-19 ARDS from a clinical trial were used for the purpose of at least 1:2 matching. A propensity-matching was based on age, severity score, oxygenation, positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and pulmonary cause of ARDS and allowed to include 112 COVID-19 and 198 non-COVID pulmonary ARDS. Results The two groups were similar on initial oxygenation. COVID-19 patients had a higher body mass index, higher CRS at day 1 (median [IQR], 35 [28–44] vs 32 [26–38] ml cmH2O−1, p = 0.037). At day 1, CRS was correlated with oxygenation only in non-COVID-19 patients; 61.6% and 68.2% of COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pulmonary ARDS were still ventilated at day 7 (p = 0.241). Oxygenation became lower in COVID-19 than in non-COVID-19 patients at days 3 and 7, while CRS became similar. VR was lower at day 1 in COVID-19 than in non-COVID-19 patients but increased from day 1 to 7 only in COVID-19 patients. VR was higher at days 1, 3 and 7 in the COVID-19 patients ventilated using heat and moisture exchangers compared to heated humidifiers. After adjustment on PaO2/FiO2, PEEP and humidification device, CRS and VR were found not different between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients at day 7. Day-28 mortality did not differ between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 patients (25.9% and 23.7%, respectively, p = 0.666). Conclusions For a similar initial oxygenation, COVID-19 ARDS initially differs from classical ARDS by a higher CRS, dissociated from oxygenation. CRS become similar for patients remaining on mechanical ventilation during the first week of evolution, but oxygenation becomes lower in COVID-19 patients. Trial registration: clinicaltrials.gov NCT04385004

Purpose In the acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), decreasing Ventilation-Perfusion $$\left( {{{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}} \right)$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch might enhance lung protection. We investigated the regional effects of higher Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) on $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch and their correlation with recruitability. We aimed to verify whether PEEP improves regional $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch, and to study the underlying mechanisms. Methods In fifteen patients with moderate and severe ARDS, two PEEP levels (5 and 15 cmH2O) were applied in random order. $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch was assessed by Electrical Impedance Tomography at each PEEP. Percentage of ventilation and perfusion reaching different ranges of $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ ratios were analyzed in 3 gravitational lung regions, leading to precise assessment of their distribution throughout different $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch compartments. Recruitability between the two PEEP levels was measured by the recruitment-to-inflation ratio method. Results In the non-dependent region, at higher PEEP, ventilation reaching the normal $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ compartment (p = 0.018) increased, while it decreased in the high $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ one (p = 0.023). In the middle region, at PEEP 15 cmH2O, ventilation and perfusion to the low $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ compartment decreased (p = 0.006 and p = 0.011) and perfusion to normal $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ increased (p = 0.003). In the dependent lung, the percentage of blood flowing through the non-ventilated compartment decreased (p = 0.041). Regional $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch improvement was correlated to lung recruitability and changes in regional tidal volume. Conclusions In patients with ARDS, higher PEEP optimizes the distribution of both ventilation (in the non-dependent areas) and perfusion (in the middle and dependent lung). Bedside measure of recruitability is associated with improved $${{\dot{V}} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{\dot{V}} {\dot{Q}}}} \right. \kern-\nulldelimiterspace} {\dot{Q}}}$$ V ˙ / Q ˙ mismatch.

Background Experimental and pilot clinical data suggest that spontaneously breathing patients with sepsis and septic shock may present increased respiratory drive and effort, even in the absence of pulmonary infection. The study hypothesis was that respiratory drive and effort may be increased in septic patients and correlated with extrapulmonary determinant and that high-flow nasal cannula may modulate drive and effort. Methods Twenty-five nonintubated patients with extrapulmonary sepsis or septic shock were enrolled. Each patient underwent three consecutive steps: low-flow oxygen at baseline, high-flow nasal cannula, and then low-flow oxygen again. Arterial blood gases, esophageal pressure, and electrical impedance tomography data were recorded toward the end of each step. Respiratory effort was measured as the negative swing of esophageal pressure (ΔPes); drive was quantified as the change in esophageal pressure during the first 500 ms from start of inspiration (P0.5). Dynamic lung compliance was calculated as the tidal volume measured by electrical impedance tomography, divided by ΔPes. The results are presented as medians [25th to 75th percentile]. Results Thirteen patients (52%) were in septic shock. The Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score was 5 [4 to 9]. During low-flow oxygen at baseline, respiratory drive and effort were elevated and significantly correlated with arterial lactate (r = 0.46, P = 0.034) and inversely with dynamic lung compliance (r = –0.735, P &lt; 0.001). Noninvasive support by high-flow nasal cannula induced a significant decrease of respiratory drive (P0.5: 6.0 [4.4 to 9.0] vs. 4.3 [3.5 to 6.6] vs. 6.6 [4.9 to 10.7] cm H2O, P &lt; 0.001) and effort (ΔPes: 8.0 [6.0 to 11.5] vs. 5.5 [4.5 to 8.0] vs. 7.5 [6.0 to 12.6] cm H2O, P &lt; 0.001). Oxygenation and arterial carbon dioxide levels remained stable during all study phases. Conclusions Patients with sepsis and septic shock of extrapulmonary origin present elevated respiratory drive and effort, which can be effectively reduced by high-flow nasal cannula. Editor’s Perspective What We Already Know about This Topic What This Article Tells Us That Is New

No abstract

No abstract

No abstract