In this rapidly scaling-up program, survival and immune reconstitution were good; women and patients followed up in centers with longer experience had better outcomes; outcomes were similar in zidovudine/stavudine-based regimens and in efavirenz/nevirapine-based regimens. Decreasing the rate of loss to follow-up should now be the top priority in antiretroviral treatment rollout.

BackgroundLarge HIV care programs frequently subsidize antiretroviral (ARV) drugs and CD4 tests, but patients must often pay for other health-related drugs and services. We estimated the financial burden of health care for households with HIV-infected adults taking antiretroviral therapy (ART) in Côte d'Ivoire.Methodology/Principal FindingsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey. After obtaining informed consent, we interviewed HIV-infected adults taking ART who had consecutively attended one of 18 HIV care facilities in Abidjan. We collected information on socioeconomic and medical characteristics. The main economic indicators were household capacity-to-pay (overall expenses minus food expenses), and health care expenditures. The primary outcome was the percentage of households confronted with catastrophic health expenditures (health expenditures were defined as catastrophic if they were greater than or equal to 40% of the capacity-to-pay). We recruited 1,190 adults. Median CD4 count was 187/mm3, median time on ART was 14 months, and 72% of subjects were women. Mean household capacity-to-pay was $213.7/month, mean health expenditures were $24.3/month, and 12.3% of households faced catastrophic health expenditures. Of the health expenditures, 75.3% were for the study subject (ARV drugs and CD4 tests, 24.6%; morbidity events diagnosis and treatment, 50.1%; transportation to HIV care centres, 25.3%) and 24.7% were for other household members. When we stratified by most recent CD4 count, morbidity events related expenses were significantly lower when subjects had higher CD4 counts.Conclusions/SignificanceMany households in Côte d'Ivoire face catastrophic health expenditures that are not attributable to ARV drugs or routine follow-up tests. Innovative schemes should be developed to help HIV-infected patients on ART face the cost of morbidity events.

We followed a cohort of 592 HIV-infected adults during 1292 person-years in Abidjan before the highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) era. On the basis of the exhaustive monitoring of nonantiretroviral drugs actually delivered to the patients and of the real cost of drugs at the cohort center's pharmacy during the study period, we estimated the mean cost of drugs per person per year (MCPPY) overall, by drug characteristics, and by patients' baseline CD4 cell count. The MCPPY was dollar 198 US overall and dolalr 83 US, dollar 101 US, dollar 186 US, dollar 233 US, and dollar 459 US in patients with a baseline CD4 count > or = 500 cells/mm, 350 to 499 cells/mm, 200 to 349 cells/mm, 100 to 199 cells/mm, and <100 cells/mm, respectively. The most costly classes of drugs were the antibacterial (MCPPY dollar 30 US), the antifungal (dollar 16 US), and the analgesic (dollar 6 US) classes in patients with a baseline CD4 count > or = 500 cells/mm versus the antifungal (dollar 208 US), the antibacterial (dollar 49 US), and the antiparasitic (dollar 31 US) classes in patients with a baseline CD4 count <100 cells/mm. These data could be used in further cost-effectiveness analyses that seek to prioritize health interventions. Meanwhile, they roughly suggest that successful antiretroviral treatment, which would stabilize the CD4 count above 500 cells/mm, could reduce by 5-fold the cost of nonantiretroviral drugs in HIV-infected adults in Abidjan.