Snow slab avalanches, characterized by a distinct, broad fracture line, are released following anticrack propagation in highly porous weak snow layers buried below cohesive slabs. The anticrack mechanism is driven by the volumetric collapse of the weak layer, which leads to the closure of crack faces and to the onset of frictional contact. Here, on the basis of snow fracture experiments, full-scale avalanche measurements and numerical simulations, we report the existence of a transition from sub-Rayleigh anticrack to supershear crack propagation. This transition follows the Burridge–Andrews mechanism, in which a supershear daughter crack nucleates ahead of the main fracture front and eventually propagates faster than the shear wave speed. Furthermore, we show that the supershear propagation regime can exist even if the shear-to-normal stress ratio is lower than the static friction coefficient as a result of the loss of frictional resistance during collapse. This finding shows that snow slab avalanches have fundamental similarities with strike-slip earthquakes.
For the release of a slab avalanche, crack propagation within a weak snowpack layer below a cohesive snow slab is required. As crack speed measurements can give insight into underlying processes, we analysed three crack propagation events that occurred in similar snowpacks and covered all scales relevant for avalanche release. For the largest scale, up to 400 m, we estimated crack speed from an avalanche movie; for scales between 5 and 25 m, we used accelerometers placed on the snow surface and for scales below 5 m, we performed a propagation saw test. The mean crack speeds ranged from 36 ± 6 to 49 ± 5 m s−1, and did not exhibit scale dependence. Using the discrete element method and the material point method, we reproduced the measured crack speeds reasonably well, in particular the terminal crack speed observed at smaller scales. Finally, we used a finite element model to assess the speed of different elastic waves in a layered snowpack. Results suggest that the observed cracks propagated as mixed mode closing cracks and that the flexural wave of the slab is responsible for the energy transfer to the crack tip.
Snow slab avalanches are released following anticrack propagation in highly porous weak snow layers buried below cohesive slabs. The volumetric collapse of the weak layer leads to the closure of crack faces followed by the onset of frictional contact. Here on the basis of snow fracture experiments, full-scale avalanche measurements, and numerical simulations, we report the existence of a transition from sub-Rayleigh anticrack to supershear crack propagation involving the Burridge-Andrews mechanism. Remarkably, this transition occurs even if the shear-to-normal stress ratio is lower than the static friction coefficient as a result of the loss of frictional resistance during collapse. This finding represents a new paradigm in our understanding of snow slab avalanches presenting fundamental similarities with strike-slip earthquakes.
<p>Snow slab avalanches release due to crack propagation within a weak snow layer buried below a cohesive snow slab. In 1979, McClung [1] described this process assuming an interfacial and quasi-brittle shear failure for the weak layer. This model fails to explain observations of propagation on low angle terrain and remote avalanche triggering. To address this shortcoming, Heierli et al. [2] adapted in 2008 the anticrack concept developed for porous rocks to weak snow layers. In 2018, Gaume et al. [3] showed that mixed mode shear-compression failure and subsequent volumetric collapse (anticrack) of the weak layer were necessary ingredients to accurately model propagation mechanisms, thus reconciling apparently conflicting theories. More recently, large scale simulations based on the Material Point Method (MPM) and field observations revealed a transition from slow anticrack to fast supershear crack propagation [4]. This transition, which occurs after a few meters suggests that a pure shear model should be sufficient to estimate the release sizes of large avalanche release zones.</p><p>Motivated by this new understanding, we developed a depth-averaged MPM for the simulation of snow slab avalanches release. Here, the weak layer is treated as an external shear force acting at the base of the slab and is modeled as an elastic quasi-brittle material with residual friction. We first validate the model based on simulations of the so-called Propagation Saw Test (PST) and comparing numerical results to analytical solutions and 3D simulations. Second, we perform large scale simulations and analyse the shape and size of avalanche release zones. Finally we apply the model to a complex real topography. Due to the low computational cost compared to 3D MPM, we expect our work to have important operational applications for the evaluation of avalanche release sizes required as input in hazard mapping model chains. Finally, the model can be easily adapted to simulate both the initiation and dynamics of shallow landslides.</p><p><strong>References</strong></p><p>[1] McClung, D.M. Shear fracture precipitated by strain softening as a mechanism of dry slab avalanche release. <em>Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth</em> (1979) <strong>84</strong> 3519--3526<br>[2] Heierli, J., Gumbsch, P. and Zaiser, M. Anticrack nucleation as triggering mechanism for snow slab avalanches. <em>Science</em> (2008) 321(5886):240-3<br>[3] Gaume, J., Gast, T. and Teran, J. and van Herwijnen, A and Jiang, C. Dynamic anticrack propagation in snow. <em>Nature Communications</em> (2018) <strong>9 </strong>3047<br>[4] Trottet, B., Simenhois, R., Bobillier, G., van Herwijnen, A., Jiang, C. and Gaume, J. Transition from sub-Rayleigh anticrack to supershear crack propagation in snow avalanches. (2021). doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-963978/v1<br><br></p>
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.