Not all subjects profit equally from vocational rehabilitation in terms of improvement of work performance. Unfavorable courses of work skills were shown for participants with schizophrenia and low education. Low individual satisfaction with performance is related to consistently low or moderate performance. Group differences predicted reintegration success. Future research should focus on different responder groups and their identification in early stages of the rehabilitation process to ensure appropriate assistance, particularly for subjects with poorer performance.
Our results show that the rehabilitants' "capability to work" had improved at the six month mark of the rehabilitation program. It appears that baseline variables of the AFP subscales at program intake were largely related to psychopathology and subjective quality of life measures. Sociodemographic parameters, educational level, and attention measures were associated with work capability improvement after six months.
Vocational rehabilitation of subjects with severe mental illness should take account of each rehabilitant's individual capacities and abilities as well as individual concepts of the disorder. Moreover, integrated concepts of medical treatment and vocational rehabilitation are needed to ensure rehabilitation success.
Objective parameters have a higher predictive potential regarding vocational reintegration of psychologically ill people compared to subjective criteria. Psychiatric diagnoses as defined by DSM-IV do not reveal relevant connections with subsequent vocational successful reintegration, whereas the initial level of functioning has a definite predictive value.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.