Model-Driven Engineering (MDE) advocates the use of models at every step of the software development process. Within this context, a team of engineers collectively and collaboratively contribute to a large set of interrelated models. Even if the main focus can be on a single model (e.g. a class diagram model), related elements in other models (e.g. a requirement model) often have to be considered and/or accessed. Moreover, all the involved models do not necessarily conform to the same metamodel and thus may have been built using different independent Domain-Specific Languages (DSLs). Such a situation has already been frequently observed in many large-scale industrial deployments of MDE. Manually coordinating all the involved models, i.e. being able to both manage and use the links existing between them, can become a cumbersome and difficult task. As a proposal to solve this inter-DSL coordination issue, we introduce in this paper a generic and extensible inter-model traceability and navigation environment based on the complementary use of megamodeling and model weaving. We illustrate our solution with a concrete working example.

A model transformation can be decomposed into a sequence of subtransformations, i.e. a transformation chain, each addressing a limited set of concerns. However, with current transformation technologies it is hard to (re)use and compose subtransformations without being very familiar with their implementation details. Furthermore, the difficulty of combining different transformation technologies often thwarts choosing the most appropriate technology for each subtransformation. In this paper we propose a model-based approach to reuse and compose subtransformations in a technology-independent fashion. This is accomplished by developing a unified representation of transformations and facilitating detailed transformation specifications. We have implemented our approach in a tool called UniTI, which also provides a transformation chain editor. We have evaluated our approach by comparing it to alternative approaches.

No abstract

Model Driven Engineering (MDE) has to deal with an increasing number of interrelated modelling artefacts. The Model Driven Performance Engineering (MDPE) process is one concrete illustration of such a situation. This process applies MDE within the context of performance engineering in order to support domain experts, who generally lack the necessary performance expertise. In this paper, we demonstrate the use of megamodelling to manage the numerous artefacts involved in MDPE. Megamodelling enables the explicit modelling of the metadata on MDE artefacts, including possible relationships between those artefacts. Appropriate tool support enables different stakeholders to exploit this additional information. Applying the megamodelling to MDPE pointed out the need for an extension of the existing approach. Thus, the result of the paper is twofold: first, an extension of megamodelling is proposed, second the benefits of the approach are shown on the MDPE use case. We claim that the extension is not solely useful for the latter case, but has a more generic applicability.

The Model Driven Development (MDD) paradigm stimulates the use of models as the main artifacts for software development. These models can be situated at high levels of abstraction, close to the application's business domain. Many consecutive automatic transformations (a transformation chain) can be applied to these models to add the necessary details in order to generate a concrete implementation. This means that a large part of the total development effort is relocated to the development of transformations and hence we should have the necessary tooling support for designing transformation chains. In this paper we propose a metamodel for a transformation chain modeling language that enables implementation independent composition of transformations. We also propose a concrete syntax for this language that is based on UML activity diagrams.