Cancer survivorship has become a major issue due to people living longer with the effects of cancer treatment. A key issue in this area are the 'iatrogenic effects' of cancer treatments and their adverse impact on the quality of long-term patient survival. This paper considers the late physical effects of treatment for cervical cancer, in particular psychosocial problems associated with sexuality. The aim of this paper was to explore women's sexuality following treatment for cervical cancer. A qualitative phenomenological design was used to explore the lived experiences of a purposive sample of 13 women 2-3 years after treatment, using in-depth interviewing. The findings demonstrate that cancer treatment can result in a number of late physical effects, including bladder and bowel dysfunction. Moreover, the physical problems led to sexual difficulties experienced several years after treatment. Concerns were expressed by patients about perceived psychosexual difficulties encountered as a result of treatment. In conclusion, the study raises issues associated with the management of late treatment effects and its impact on sexuality. The findings underline the need for effective communication of possible iatrogenic effects of treatment during follow-up care and a need for research to consider the advice and information that women require about long-term treatment effects.
A clear lack of enthusiasm amongst specialist nurses in cancer and palliative care to undertake prescribing training was identified. It is noteworthy that half of the Macmillan nurses trained as extended formulary independent nurse prescribers were not prescribing. Since government targets for nurse prescribing are not yet being met, these findings raise important questions concerning whether extended nurse prescribing is likely to be a successful initiative in cancer and palliative care.
This small exploratory study has shown that a pharmacy-prepared reusable MO provided visual, objective insights into medication wastage. This resulted in improved communication of drug needs and reduced wastage-the foundation for concordance.
Nurse prescribing is a key government initiative which aims to enhance patient care. The aim of this study was to investigate the prescribing practice of specialist nurses working in cancer and palliative care and to explore the benefits of and barriers to uptake of nurse prescribing training. A national postal survey of 2252 Macmillan nurses was undertaken using a structured questionnaire with open-ended questions. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis for 1575 respondents (70% response rate). Only 13% (203) had undergone prescribing training and of these 105 provided responses to the open questions concerning training and of the 87% (1372) who had not undergone the training, 423 provided details on barriers to nurse prescribing training. The data presented in this paper draw from this data. The findings indicate that those who prescribed gave the prospect of improving care as the main reason for undertaking nurse prescribing training. The main reasons why these specialist nurses did not undertake training were: resource issues particularly with respect to backfill while training, lack of medical support and mentorship, concerns about the relevance of prescribing as a nursing role and prioritizing other courses. If nurse prescribing is to be more widely available for cancer and palliative care patients it is important in both primary and secondary care to address the resource and support issues.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.