Platelet activation and aggregation are central processes in the pathophysiology of coronary heart disease. Mean platelet volume (MPV), a determinant of platelet activation, is a newly emerging risk marker for atherothrombosis. Rosuvastatin, a new hydrophilic 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitor (statin), is approved as an adjunct to diet in patients with dyslipidemia. In this study, we evaluated the effects of rosuvastatin on the MPV levels in patients with uncontrolled primary dyslipidemia with hypolipidemic treatment. We selected 30 age, sex and body mass index matched patients with uncontrolled primary dyslipidemia and hypolipidemic diet treatment and 30 normolipidemic healthy subjects. Dyslipidemic patients were treated with 10 mg/day rosuvastatin for 12 weeks. Metabolic parameters and MPV were measured at baseline and after rosuvastatin treatment in dyslipidemic group. At baseline, the dyslipidemic group had significantly higher MPV levels than in the healthy control group (8.4 +/-1.2 fl vs. 8.1 +/-0 1.0 fl, p < 0.005). The level of MPV decreased significantly after rosuvastatin treatment from a mean of 8.4 +/- 1.2 fl to 8.1 +/- 1.3 fl, (p < 0.001). The changes in MPV levels with rosuvastatin treatment were not correlated to changes in plasma lipids (p > 0.05). In addition to its well-known hypolipidemic effect, rosuvastatin also possesses significant anti-platelet activation properties. This antiplatelet effect of rosuvastatin treatment could play a role in reducing cardiovascular complications in primary hyperlipidemic patients.

No abstract

We aimed to identify whether abdominal fat distribution could affect the outcome in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients treated with aromatase inhibitors (AIs) or not. A total of 42 MBC patients treated with first line hormonal therapy were enrolled in this study. Factors associated with overall survival in the univariate analysis were age, c-erb-B2 expression intensity (+++ versus others by immunohistochemistry), and WHR, whereas only WHR retained significance in the multivariate analysis. Median overall survival figures were 472 days versus unreached for patients with a WHR of <0.92 and >or=0.92 (Log rank statistic=9.76, P=0.002). Similarly, the corresponding progression free survival figures for patients with a WHR of <0.92 and >or=0.92 were 423 versus 1004 days (Log rank statistic=6.37, P=0.012). This study suggests that WHR may serve as a potential predictive marker in MBC patients treated with AIs.

No abstract

1070 Background: Aromatase inhibitors represent a novel hormonal therapy for breast cancer. Aromatase is expressed in the ovaries, brain, bone and, adipose and breast tissue. Elevated WHR, representing a higher abdominal fat distribution, has been associated with both the development of and mortality from breast cancer. Therefore, we aimed to identify whether abdominal fat distribution could affect the outcome in metastatic breast cancer patients treated with AIs. Methods: A total of 46 metastatic breast cancer patients treated with first line hormonal therapy were enrolled in this study. Pretreatment body weight, height, BMI and WHR were measured. Estrogen, progesteron and c- erb-B2 receptor status were also evaluated in analyses. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression analyses, and Kaplan Meier survival curves subjected to log rank testing were utilized for the survival analyses. Forward likelihood ratio was used for the multivariate selection process. A P value < 0.05 was considered to be significant. Results: Median age was 51 years (range 28 - 75). 36 patients were treated with letrozole and 10 patients with anastrozole. Median body weight, height, WHR and BMI were found to be 68.5 kg (range 46 - 115), 156 cm (range 137 - 167), 0.91 (range 0.7 - 1.2), and 28.7 (range 18 - 45), respectively. Factors associated with overall survival in the univariate analysis were age, c-erb-B2 expression intensity (+++ versus others by immunohistochemistry), and WHR, whereas only WHR retained significance in the multivariate analysis. Likewise, predictors of progression free survival were c-erb-B2 expression intensity and WHR. However, none of these factors was significant in the multivariate analysis. Median overall survival figures were 472 days versus unreached for patients with a WHR of <0.92 and =0.92 (Log rank statistic = 9.76, P = 0.002). Similarly, the corresponding progression free survival figures for patients with a WHR of <0.92 and =0.92 were 423 versus 1,004 days (Log rank statistic = 6.37, P = 0.012). Conclusions: This is the first report examining and suggesting the value of abdominal fat distribution in relation with benefit from AIs in metastatic breast cancer. Our results should be validated in larger series. No significant financial relationships to disclose.