The ability of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to tolerate ionizing radiation damage requires many DNA-repair and checkpoint genes, most having human orthologs. A genome-wide screen of diploid mutants homozygous with respect to deletions of 3,670 nonessential genes revealed 107 new loci that influence gamma-ray sensitivity. Many affect replication, recombination and checkpoint functions. Nearly 90% were sensitive to other agents, and most new genes could be assigned to the following functional groups: chromatin remodeling, chromosome segregation, nuclear pore formation, transcription, Golgi/vacuolar activities, ubiquitin-mediated protein degradation, cytokinesis, mitochondrial activity and cell wall maintenance. Over 50% share homology with human genes, including 17 implicated in cancer, indicating that a large set of newly identified human genes may have related roles in the toleration of radiation damage.

Dental caries explorers may become contaminated during routine caries examinations with pathogenic organisms and thereby potentially transmit infections from one tooth to another within a patient. The purpose of this study was to test the hypothesis that the contamination status of explorers influenced the caries risk of second molars. Two explorer contamination statuses were defined: (1) contamination status 1 – explorers which had probed a carious molar just prior to examining the second molar versus explorers which had probed a sound molar prior to examining the second molar, and (2) contamination status 2 – sterile explorers versus explorers which had probed several teeth. Caries examinations were performed by 4 dentists on a cohort of 4th grade students in Belize City. The examination dates and sample sizes (n) were: September-October 1989 (n = 1,277), January 1991 (n = 1,111), and January 1992 (n = 961), and January-February 1993 (n = 861). Within this cohort, there were 221 subjects who (1) had at least one pit and fissure carious onset on a caries-free second molar, (2) had no evidence of dental treatments, and (3) were examined by the same examiner during the entire study. After adjusting for confounding variables, the examination of a second molar with a dental caries explorer in either contamination status 1 or 2 had no substantial effect on the caries risk (rate ratio 0.95, 95% confidence interval: 0.77–1.18, and rate ratio 1.18,95% confidence interval: 0.89–1.56, respectively). If a true rate ratio of 1.7 or greater was associated with the contamination status 1 and 2, these analyses had more than 99 and 80% probability of detecting it, respectively. Conclusions: Examining a sound second molar with a contaminated dental explorer either does not affect the caries risk, or results in such a small increase in caries risk that it can only be reliably identified in studies where the exposure of sound teeth to contaminated dental explorers is randomized.