Background
We assessed the efficacy and safety of the Xiaoketongbi Formula (XF) vs. pregabalin in patients with painful diabetic neuropathy (PDN).
Methods
Patients with PDN (n = 68) were included in a single‐center, randomized, single‐blind, double‐dummy, parallel controlled clinical trial. The primary outcome was the change in the Brief Pain Inventory for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (BPI‐DPN). Secondary outcomes evaluated included the reduction of BPI‐DPN >50%, changes in the numeric rating scale‐11 (NRS‐11) score for pain, Daily Sleep Interference Diary (DSID), Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC), nerve conduction velocity (NCV), and adverse events.
Results
After 10 weeks of treatment, the BPI‐DPN score reduced from 42.44 ± 17.56 to 26.47 ± 22.22 and from 52.03 ± 14.30 to 37.85 ± 17.23 in the XF and pregabalin group (
P
s
< 0.001), respectively. The difference in the absolute change in BPI‐DPN score between both groups was −1.79 (95% CI: −9.09, 5.50;
p
= 0.625). In the XF and pregabalin groups, 44.1% (15/34) and 20.6% (7/34) of patients reported a BPI‐DPN reduction >50% (
p
= 0.038), respectively. There were no significant differences between groups in NRS‐11 and DSID (
P
s
> 0.05). A significantly greater number of patients in the XF group felt “significantly improved” or “improved” than in the pregabalin group (35.3% (12/34) vs. 11.8% (4/34),
p
= 0.045). The absolute change in motor nerve conduction velocity of the right median nerve was significantly different between both groups (XF group 0.7 ± 2.3 vs. pregabalin group −2.2 ± 4.1,
p
= 0.004). No serious adverse events were reported in either group.
Conclusions
XF is equivalent to pregabalin in reducing pain symptoms and improves the quality of life in patients with PDN. In addition, XF has the potential to improve nerve function by increasing NCV.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.