Background and Purpose: Higher rates of strokes have been observed in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), but data regarding the outcomes of COVID-19 patients suffering from acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion (LVO) are lacking. We report our initial experience in the treatment of acute ischemic stroke with LVO in patients with COVID-19. Methods: All consecutive patients with COVID-19 with acute ischemic stroke due to LVO treated in our institution during the 6 first weeks of the COVID-19 outbreak were included. Baseline clinical and radiological findings, treatment, and short-term outcomes are reported. Results: We identified 10 patients with confirmed COVID-19 treated for an acute ischemic stroke due to LVO. Eight were men, with a median age of 59.5 years. Seven had none or mild symptoms of COVID-19 at stroke onset. Median time from COVID-19 symptoms to stroke onset was 6 days. All patients had brain imaging within 3 hours from symptoms onset. Five patients had multi-territory LVO. Five received intravenous alteplase. All patients had mechanical thrombectomy. Nine patients achieved successful recanalization (mTICI2B-3), none experienced early neurological improvement, 4 had early cerebral reocclusion, and a total of 6 patients (60%) died in the hospital. Conclusions: Best medical care including early intravenous thrombolysis, and successful and prompt recanalization achieved with mechanical thrombectomy, resulted in poor outcomes in patients with COVID-19. Although our results require further confirmation, a different pharmacological approach (antiplatelet or other) should be investigated to take in account inflammatory and coagulation disorders associated with COVID-19.

R ecent randomized trials demonstrated the superiority of bridging therapy (mechanical thrombectomy [MT] added on intravenous thrombolysis [IVT]) compared with IVT alone for the treatment of acute stroke because of large artery occlusion.1 However, endovascular procedures can currently be provided in comprehensive stroke centers only. Therefore, candidates for MT admitted to primary stroke centers or general hospitals should urgently be transferred after initiation of IVT, and futile, interhospital transfers (ie, patients who ultimately do not undergo MT) because of early recanalization (ER) are as high as 30%.2 Consequently, it is essential to improve no-ER prediction based on admission data to limit futile, resourceconsuming, interhospital transfers. To date, 2 published metaanalyses have provided partial data on recanalization rates after IVT, but the first merged early-and later-assessed recanalization, 3 whereas the second included only sonothrombolysis trials. 4 Moreover, neither provided information on incidence of ER according to site of occlusion, nor on ER predictors.We therefore performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the incidence and predictors of ER after IVT. MethodsThe article was prepared in accordance with the Meta-analysis Of Observational Studies in Epidemiology guidelines. Studies published between January 1,1990 and January 27, 2016 were eligible for review if they: (1) enrolled ≥15 IVT-treated stroke patients; (2) confirmed the presence of arterial occlusion before IVT; and (3) reported data on incidence or predictors of ER. ER was defined as occurring ≤3 hours after initiation of IVT, regardless of the imaging method used. Details on search strategy, study exclusion criteria, data extraction, assessment of study quality, and definition of complete and partial ER are provided in the Methods section and Tables I through III in the online-only Data Supplement.Background and Purpose-After the demonstration of efficacy of bridging therapy, reliably predicting early recanalization (ER; ≤3 hours after start of intravenous thrombolysis) would be essential to limit futile, resource-consuming, interhospital transfers. We present the first systematic review on the incidence and predictors of ER after intravenous thrombolysis alone. Methods-We systematically searched for studies including patients solely treated by intravenous thrombolysis that reported incidence of ER and its association with baseline variables. Using meta-analyses, we estimated pooled incidence of ER, including according to occlusion site, and summarized the available evidence regarding predictors of no-ER. Results-We identified 26 studies that together included 2063 patients. The overall incidence of partial or complete ER was 33% (95% confidence interval, 27-40). It varied according to occlusion site: 52% (39-64) for distal middle cerebral artery, 35% (28-42) for proximal middle cerebral artery, 13% (6-22) for intracranial carotid artery, and 13% (0-35) for basilar occlusion. Corresponding rates for complete ER were 3...

No abstract

Background and Purpose-It remains debated whether clinical scores can help identify acute ischemic stroke patients with large-artery occlusion and hence improve triage in the era of thrombectomy. We aimed to determine the accuracy of published clinical scores to predict large-artery occlusion. Methods-We assessed the performance of 13 clinical scores to predict large-artery occlusion in consecutive patients with acute ischemic stroke undergoing clinical examination and magnetic resonance or computed tomographic angiography ≤6 hours of symptom onset. When no cutoff was published, we used the cutoff maximizing the sum of sensitivity and specificity in our cohort. We also determined, for each score, the cutoff associated with a false-negative rate ≤10%. Results-Of 1004 patients (median National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score, 7; range, 0-40), 328 (32.7%) had an occlusion of the internal carotid artery, M1 segment of the middle cerebral artery, or basilar artery. The highest accuracy (79%; 95% confidence interval, 77-82) was observed for National Institute of Health Stroke Scale score ≥11 and Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation Scale score ≥5. However, these cutoffs were associated with false-negative rates >25%. Cutoffs associated with an false-negative rate ≤10% were 5, 1, and 0 for National Institute of Health Stroke Scale, Rapid Arterial Occlusion Evaluation Scale, and Cincinnati Prehospital Stroke Severity Scale, respectively. Conclusions-Using published cutoffs for triage would result in a loss of opportunity for ≥20% of patients with large-artery occlusion who would be inappropriately sent to a center lacking neurointerventional facilities. Conversely, using cutoffs reducing the false-negative rate to 10% would result in sending almost every patient to a comprehensive stroke center. Our findings, therefore, suggest that intracranial arterial imaging should be performed in all patients with acute ischemic stroke presenting within 6 hours of symptom onset.

Background and Purpose: The efficiency of prehospital care chain response and the adequacy of hospital resources are challenged amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) outbreak, with suspected consequences for patients with ischemic stroke eligible for mechanical thrombectomy (MT). Methods: We conducted a prospective national-level data collection of patients treated with MT, ranging 45 days across epidemic containment measures instatement, and of patients treated during the same calendar period in 2019. The primary end point was the variation of patients receiving MT during the epidemic period. Secondary end points included care delays between onset, imaging, and groin puncture. To analyze the primary end point, we used a Poisson regression model. We then analyzed the correlation between the number of MTs and the number of COVID-19 cases hospitalizations, using the Pearson correlation coefficient (compared with the null value). Results: A total of 1513 patients were included at 32 centers, in all French administrative regions. There was a 21% significant decrease (0.79; [95%CI, 0.76–0.82]; P <0.001) in MT case volumes during the epidemic period, and a significant increase in delays between imaging and groin puncture, overall (mean 144.9±SD 86.8 minutes versus 126.2±70.9; P <0.001 in 2019) and in transferred patients (mean 182.6±SD 82.0 minutes versus 153.25±67; P <0.001). After the instatement of strict epidemic mitigation measures, there was a significant negative correlation between the number of hospitalizations for COVID and the number of MT cases ( R 2 −0.51; P =0.04). Patients treated during the COVID outbreak were less likely to receive intravenous thrombolysis and to have unwitnessed strokes (both P <0.05). Conclusions: Our study showed a significant decrease in patients treated with MTs during the first stages of the COVID epidemic in France and alarming indicators of lengthened care delays. These findings prompt immediate consideration of local and regional stroke networks preparedness in the varying contexts of COVID-19 pandemic evolution.

Background and Purpose— Optimal blood pressure (BP) targets during mechanical thrombectomy (MT) for acute ischemic stroke (AIS) are unknown, and randomized controlled trials addressing this issue are lacking. We aimed to perform a systematic review of studies evaluating the influence of periprocedural BP on functional outcome after MT. Methods— Studies assessing periprocedural BP effect on functional outcome published after January 1st, 2012 were included in the systematic review. The PRISMA checklist and flow diagram were followed for the design and reporting of this work. Results— Nine studies were included, for a total of 1037 patients. The heterogeneity in findings with respect to BP monitoring and studied parameters precluded a meta-analysis. Mean arterial pressure was the most frequently reported parameter to describe BP variability during MT, and systolic BP was the main parameter used to define periprocedural BP targets. Five studies suggested an association between 3 types of BP drops as predictors of poor functional outcome at 3 months: >40% drop in mean arterial pressure compared with baseline (odds ratio=2.8; [1.09–7.19]; P =0.032), lowest mean arterial pressure before recanalization (odds ratio=1.28; [1.01–1.62] per 10 mm Hg drop below 100 mm Hg; P =0.04), and MAP drops (odds ratio=4.38; [1.53–12.6] for drops >10%). Four studies did not show an association between BP during MT and functional outcome, including 3 studies with strict periprocedural systolic BP targets (within a 140–180 mm Hg). Conclusions— BP drops during MT may be associated with a worse functional outcome. When strict systolic BP targets are achieved, no association between BP and functional outcome was also noted. Both conclusions require further evaluation in randomized studies.

ObjectiveTo identify early prognostic factors of poor clinical outcome in patients treated by endovascular therapy (EVT) with successful recanalization.MethodsWe reviewed our monocentric prospectively collected EVT database of patients with anterior circulation acute ischemic stroke (AIS) from January 2016 to April 2018 who had achieved successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction score ≥ 2b) at the end of the procedure. A poor outcome was defined as a 3-month modified Rankin Scale score of ≥3.ResultsA total of 324 patients were included, among whom 186 (57.4%) had a poor outcome. Multivariate logistic regression indicated that age (per 10-year increase, odds ratio [OR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12–1.60), baseline NIH Stroke Scale score (per 1-unit increase, OR 1.09, 95% CI 1.04–1.15), initial infarct volume (per a log+1 increase, OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.05–1.67), blood glucose level (per a log+1 increase, OR 2.60, 95% CI 1.01–6.66), and neutrophil count (per 1,000-unit increase, OR 1.08, 95% CI 1.01–1.17) were all associated with poor clinical outcome.ConclusionsIn addition to baseline severe AIS criteria, high neutrophil count and high blood glucose, known from experimental studies to be associated with downstream microvascular thromboinflammation, are independently associated with poor outcome. These findings support a deleterious role of thromboinflammation in patient recovery despite successful recanalization.

Background and Purpose— Parenchymal hematoma (PH) is a rare but dreadful complication of acute ischemic stroke with unclear underlying mechanisms. We aimed to study the incidence and predictors of PH after mechanical thrombectomy. Methods— Data from a prospective observational multicenter registry was screened to identify acute ischemic stroke patients with an anterior circulation large vessel occlusion who underwent mechanical thrombectomy. Clinical, imaging, and procedural characteristics were used for the analysis, including brain imaging systematically performed at 24 hours. PH occurrence was assessed according to ECASS (European Collaborative Acute Stroke Study) criteria. Univariate and multivariable analyses were performed to identify predictors of PH. Results— A total of 1316 patients were included in the study. PH occurred in 153 out of 1316 patients (11.6%) and was associated with a lower rate of favorable outcome and increased mortality. On multivariable analysis, age (per 1 year increase, odds ratio [OR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.00–1.03; P =0.05), current smoking (OR, 2.02; 95% CI, 1.32–3.09; P <0.01), admission Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score (per a decrease of 1 point, OR, 1.70; 95% CI, 1.18–2.44; P <0.01), general anesthesia (OR, 1.98; 95% CI, 1.36–2.90; P <0.001), angiographic poor collaterals (OR, 2.13; 95% CI, 1.36–3.33; P <0.001) and embolization in new territory (OR, 2.94; 95% CI, 1.70–5.10; P <0.001) were identified as independent predictors of PH. Conclusions— PH occurred at a rate of 11.6% after mechanical thrombectomy, with high morbidity and mortality. Our study identified clinical, radiological, and procedural predictors of PH occurrence that can serve as the focus of future periprocedural management studies with the aim of reducing its occurrence. Clinical Trial Registration— URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT03776877.