Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a bedside monitoring tool that noninvasively visualizes local ventilation and arguably lung perfusion distribution. This article reviews and discusses both methodological and clinical aspects of thoracic EIT. Initially, investigators addressed the validation of EIT to measure regional ventilation. Current studies focus mainly on its clinical applications to quantify lung collapse, tidal recruitment, and lung overdistension to titrate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and tidal volume. In addition, EIT may help to detect pneumothorax. Recent studies evaluated EIT as a tool to measure regional lung perfusion. Indicator-free EIT measurements might be sufficient to continuously measure cardiac stroke volume. The use of a contrast agent such as saline might be required to assess regional lung perfusion. As a result, EIT-based monitoring of regional ventilation and lung perfusion may visualize local ventilation and perfusion matching, which can be helpful in the treatment of patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Avoiding tidal recruitment and collapse during mechanical ventilation should reduce the risk of lung injury. Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) enables detection of tidal recruitment by measuring regional ventilation delay inhomogeneity (RVDI) during a slow inflation breath with a tidal volume (VT) of 12 mL/kg body weight (BW). Clinical applicability might be limited by such high VTs resulting in high end-inspiratory pressures (PEI) during positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titration. We hypothesized that RVDI can be obtained with acceptable accuracy from reduced slow inflation VTs. In seven ventilated pigs with experimental lung injury, tidal recruitment was quantified by computed tomography at PEEP levels changed stepwise between 0 and 25 cmH2O. RVDI was measured by EIT during slow inflation VTs of 12, 9, 7.5, and 6 mL/kg BW. Linear correlation of tidal recruitment and RVDI was excellent for VTs of 12 (R2 = 0.83, p < 0.001) and 9 mL/kg BW (R2 = 0.83, p < 0.001) but decreased for VTs of 7.5 (R2 = 0.76, p < 0.001) and 6 mL/kg BW (R2 = 0.71, p < 0.001). With any reduction in slow inflation VT, PEI decreased at all PEEP levels. Receiver-Operator-Characteristic curve analyses revealed that RVDI-thresholds to predict distinct amounts of tidal recruitment differ when obtained from different slow inflation VTs. In conclusion, tidal recruitment can sufficiently be monitored by EIT-based RVDI-calculation with a slow inflation of 9 mL/kg BW.

The results of combined validation indicate that monitoring of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] by EIT is possible. However, care should be taken when trying to quantify [Formula: see text] by EIT, as imaging artefacts and model bias may void necessary spatial matching.