In kidney transplantation with routine rATG induction, DGF was related to size and gender, donor creatinine, and immunosuppressive protocol. Despite low first-year rejection rates, DGF was associated with inferior patient survival. Importantly, patients with DGF continued to be at risk for rejection beyond the first year. Donor and recipient selection impacts short-term outcomes, and induction alone may not confer a long-term advantage without further modification of baseline therapy.
No data are currently available that describe the clinical outcomes associated with Thymoglobulin (rabbit polyclonal anti-thymocyte globulin) induction in pediatric renal transplant recipients. We report the outcomes of 17 pediatric renal transplant recipients (mean age 10.1+/-5.2 years) transplanted between 1 August 1999 and 31 July 2001. Eleven patients (65%) were Caucasian and 6 (35%) were African-American. Eleven (65%) recipients received cadaveric allografts. Two patients (12%) were second allograft recipients. One patient had primary allograft non-function secondary to vascular thrombosis. Two patients (12%) had delayed allograft function. Immunosuppression consisted of Thymoglobulin induction (mean number of doses 6+/-1.7) with tacrolimus (62%) or cyclosporine A (38%), mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone. One year post transplant, patient and graft survival was 100% and 93%, respectively. No acute rejection episodes occurred during the first 6 months after transplantation in any of the recipients. Additionally, no rejection episode occurred among the 14 patients followed for 1 year after transplant. The incidences of asymptomatic cytomegalovirus (CMV) and Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) seroconversion at 1 year in seronegative recipients with a seropositive donor were 100% of 4 patients and 0% of 4 patients, respectively. No symptomatic CMV or EBV infections and no post-transplant lymphoproliferative disease have occurred in any patient. These short-term data suggest that Thymogobulin induction is safe and effective in combination with triple immunosuppressive therapy for preventing early rejection in pediatric renal transplant recipients.
Recipients over 60 yr receiving rATG induction have acceptable renal function and a low risk of rejection; however, reduced survival was noted among those receiving >6 mg/kg. These data suggest that when used, lower cumulative dosages of rATG are preferable in the older recipient.
Numerous case reports describe patients with previously documented immunity developing active hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after transplantation. However, the risk of reactivation of HBV under long-term immunosuppression in hepatitis B core antibody (HBcAb)-positive, hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)-negative transplant recipients has not been clearly described. Herein, we present a long-term follow-up for 49 HBcAb-positive, HBsAg-negative recipients (27 liver, 18 kidney, 4 pancreas) transplanted between June 1996 and April 2001. Among these, 37 recipients (76%) were HBsAb positive at transplantation. Immunosuppression consisted of various antibody induction regimens in 20 (41%) of the recipients with either tacrolimus (33 [67%])- or cyclosporine (16 [33%])-based maintenance immunosuppression. The incidence and duration of HBV prophylaxis was not significant. No patient received hepatitis B immunoglobulin (HBIG) before or after transplantation. Additionally, only two patients received lamivudine, which was started post transplant without clinical indication. The mean length of follow-up was 3.1+/-1.4 years. At the last follow-up, overall patient and graft survival were 98% and 96%, respectively. Patient survival was 96% in liver, 100% in kidney, and 100% in pancreas transplant recipients. The graft survival for each organ type was 93% in liver, 100% in kidney, and 75% in pancreas transplant recipients at the end of follow-up. There was no incidence of HBV reactivation defined as recurrence of HBsAg and/or HBV DNA positivity. These data suggest that the risk of reactivation of HBV in HBcAb-positive, HBsAg-negative transplant recipients under immunosuppression is negligible, regardless of immunosuppressive regimen, lamivudine prophylaxis, or HBsAb status. These patients should have access to transplantation as they enjoy excellent patient and graft survival rates.
The infection by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) and resultant coronavirus diseases-19 (COVID-19) disproportionally affects minorities, especially African Americans (AA) compared to the Caucasian population. The AA population is disproportionally affected by COVID-19, in part, because they have high prevalence of underlying conditions such as obesity, diabetes, and hypertension, which are known to exacerbate not only kidney diseases, but also COVID-19. Further, a decreased adherence to COVID-19 guidelines among tobacco smokers could result in increased infection, inflammation, reduced immune response, and lungs damage, leading to more severe form of COVID-19. As a result of high prevalence of underlying conditions that cause kidney diseases in the AA population coupled with tobacco smoking make the AA population vulnerable to severe form of both COVID-19 and kidney diseases. In this review, we describe how tobacco smoking interact with SARS-CoV-2 and exacerbates SARS-CoV-2-induced kidney diseases including renal failure, especially in the AA population. We also explore the role of extracellular vesicles (EVs) in COVID-19 patients who smoke tobacco. EVs, which play important role in tobacco-mediated pathogenesis in infectious diseases, have also shown to be important in COVID-19 pathogenesis and organ injuries including kidney. Further, we explore the potential role of EVs in biomarker discovery and therapeutics, which may help to develop early diagnosis and treatment of tobacco-induced renal injury in COVID-19 patients, respectively. Graphical Abstract
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.