Introduction
Breast cancer is a leading cause of death in women, due primarily to ineffective treatment of metastasis. Metastasis is a multi-step process that involves tumour cell escape from the primary tumour
Background Detection of extracellular vesicles (EVs) by flow cytometry has poor interlaboratory comparability, owing to differences in flow cytometer (FCM) sensitivity. Previous workshops distributed polystyrene beads to set a scatter-based diameter gate in order to improve the comparability of EV concentration measurements. However, polystyrene beads provide limited insights into the diameter of detected EVs. Objectives To evaluate gates based on the estimated diameter of EVs instead of beads. Methods A calibration bead mixture and platelet EV samples were distributed to 33 participants. Beads and a light scattering model were used to set EV diameter gates in order to measure the concentration of CD61-phycoerythrin-positive platelet EVs. Results Of the 46 evaluated FCMs, 21 FCMs detected the 600-1200-nm EV diameter gate. The 1200-3000-nm EV diameter gate was detected by 31 FCMs, with a measured EV concentration interlaboratory variability of 81% as compared with 139% with the bead diameter gate. Part of the variation in both approaches is caused by precipitation in some of the provided platelet EV samples. Flow rate calibration proved essential because systems configured to 60 μL min differed six-fold in measured flow rates between instruments. Conclusions EV diameter gates improve the interlaboratory variability as compared with previous approaches. Of the evaluated FCMs, 24% could not detect 400-nm polystyrene beads, and such instruments have limited utility for EV research. Finally, considerable differences were observed in sensitivity between optically similar instruments, indicating that maintenance and training affect the sensitivity.
Osteopontin (OPN) has been clinically and experimentally associated with breast cancer metastasis. Proteolytic cleavage of OPN by thrombin has been reported to increase its biologic activity. The purpose of this study was to determine if inhibition of thrombin could reduce the malignancy-promoting effects of OPN on breast cancer cell behavior in vitro and in vivo. MDA-MB-468 human breast cancer cells were stably transfected to overexpress OPN (468-OPN) or a control vector (468-CON) and compared for functional differences in malignant/metastatic behavior in response to treatment with the thrombin-specific inhibitor Argatroban. Western blot analysis revealed that both 468-CON and 468-OPN cells produce thrombin and the thrombin-related protein tissue factor, and express very low levels of thrombin receptor (PAR-1). In vitro assays demonstrated that Argatroban treatment (25 microg/ml) of 468-OPN cells resulted in decreased cell growth, colony-forming ability, adhesion, and migration relative to untreated controls (P < 0.05), but did not have a significant effect on 468-CON cells. Following mammary fat pad injection, treatment with Argatroban (9 mg/kg/day) increased the in vivo tumor latency of both 468-CON and 468-OPN cells, and reduced primary tumor growth of 468-OPN cells (relative to untreated controls; P < 0.05). Furthermore, Argatroban treatment significantly decreased lymphatic metastasis of both 468-CON (P < 0.04) and 468-OPN (P < 0.01) cells relative to untreated controls. These novel findings indicate that inhibition of thrombin can reduce malignant and metastatic behavior of MDA-MB-468 breast cancer cells using both OPN-dependent and OPN-independent mechanisms, and suggest that thrombin inhibitors such as Argatroban may hold potential as therapeutic agents to combat breast cancer progression.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.