Riordan (Jul 2015) 2 ABSTRACT. Objective: Orientation Week is a series of events at the beginning of the university year that introduces incoming students to university life. It is also the period of the academic year when students consume more alcohol than at any other time. Recently, we demonstrated that alcohol consumption during Orientation Week was related to alcohol consumption during the academic year. The aim of the present study was to determine whether a brief ecological momentary intervention (EMI) implemented during Orientation Week could reduce alcohol consumption during Orientation Week and throughout the academic year. Method: Participants were 130 freshman-year university students (72 women; 58 men) randomly assigned to either an ecological momentary assessment (EMA) condition or an EMA-EMI condition. In both conditions, participants reported pre-university, Orientation Week, and academic year weekend alcohol consumption. Those in the EMA-EMI condition also received EMI text messages promoting moderation every night during Orientation Week. Results: Although the EMI did not affect men's drinking, women in the EMA-EMI condition, compared with women in the EMA condition, consumed significantly fewer drinks during Orientation Week, M = 17.1, SD = 13.3 vs. M = 26.4, SD = 22.5, respectively, t(70) =-1.927, p < .05, Cohen's d = 0.473, and reported consuming fewer weekend drinks during the academic semester,

Background: The COVID-19 pandemic has many individuals around the world fearing for their lives. The constant news coverage, rapid transmission, and relatively high mortality rate, make fearfulness a natural response. To assess the fear of COVID-19, the Fear of COVID-19 Scale (FCV-19S) was developed. The primary aim of the present study is to conduct the first psychometric assessment and validation of the English version of the FCV-19S.Methods: Two samples were collected in New Zealand. Sample 1 comprised 1,624 participants of which 1,397 completed all questions and were used in the analyses. Sample 2 comprised 1,111 participants of which 1,023 completed all questions and were used in the analyses. Several psychometric tests were conducted to ascertain the scale’s reliability and validity.Results: Across both samples, the FCV-19S had high internal consistency. Consistent with the earlier validation studies, the FCV-19S displayed a moderately strong relationship with the perceived infectability and germ aversion subscales of the Perceived Vulnerability to Disease Scale (PVDS). Furthermore, FCV-19S scores were negatively correlated with the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale (WEMWBS) scores. With respect to the motivating role of fear, there was a significant relationship between FCV-19S scores and adherence to the lockdown rules that were implemented in New Zealand. Finally, consistent with recent reports on the politicization of the COVID-19 pandemic, an exploratory question found that participants who rated themselves as more conservative tended to report lower FCV-19S scores.Conclusion: The English version of the COVID-19S is a sound unidimensional scale with robust psychometric properties and can be used with confidence among English-speaking populations.

ObjectiveThe aim of Orientation Week is to help new students acclimatize to university life. However, Orientation Week is characterized by heavy alcohol use and during this time students may develop drinking patterns that persist into the academic year. The aim of the current study was to refine a brief Ecological Momentary Intervention (EMI) and test its effectiveness in reducing students’ alcohol use during both Orientation Week and throughout the academic year.MethodWe conducted two focus groups with students who had received a pilot intervention. We then updated and trialled the intervention with students from two residential colleges (College 1 n = 117 and College 2 n = 269) who were assigned to either an Ecological Momentary Assessment (EMA) condition or an EMA-EMI condition. Students in both conditions reported their pre-university drinking and their drinking during Orientation Week and the academic year via text message. In addition to the EMA messages, during Orientation Week, participants in the EMA-EMI condition received messages highlighting the potential social consequences of heavy alcohol use.ResultsIn College 1 those in the EMA-EMI condition consumed fewer drinks, relative to those in the EMA condition, across both Orientation Week (9.7 vs. 15.5; t(98) = 2.138, p = .018) and the academic year. (4.3 vs. 6.8; t(98) = 1.788, p = .039). There were, however, no significant differences between conditions in College 2.ConclusionThe current findings suggest that EMIs may be successful under certain circumstances and may provide a simple, cost-effective means of intervening.

Historical and developmental patterns of alcohol and drug use among college students: Framing the problem. In H. R. White & D. Rabiner (Eds.), College drinking and drug use (pp. 13-35

Screening and assessment (Chapter 2): screening techniques to identify patients with alcohol problems, and subsequent assessments for clinicians to undertake before providing specific treatments or interventions.• Interventions, treatments, relapse prevention and aftercare (Chapter 3): a range of varying interventions and treatments, including brief interventions, brief e-health interventions, psychosocial interventions, alcohol withdrawal management, pharmacotherapy options, and peer support programs. In the final section of this chapter, relapse prevention, aftercare, and long term follow-up strategies are discussed.• Considerations for specific populations (Chapter 4): the management of alcohol problems and treatment considerations for specific population groups of interest in Australia -genderspecific considerations, adolescents and young people, pregnant and breastfeeding women, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples, culturally and linguistically diverse groups, sexually diverse and gender diverse populations, older people, and cognitively impaired people.• Understanding comorbidities (Chapter 5): the importance of considering a range of comorbidities when providing treatment for alcohol problems. Polydrug use, comorbid mental disorders, and physical-related comorbidities are discussed.The content of this supplement is based on the various chapters of the full Guidelines for the Treatment of Alcohol Problems, which were based on reviews of the evidence, including well designed meta-analyses and randomised controlled trials, wherever possible. Where this evidence was not available, recommendations were based on the best available research or clinical experience. Each recommendation in the guidelines is accompanied with a level of evidence based on National Health and Medical Research Council evidence recommendations (Box 2), 21 with "A" representing the most evidence and "GPP" (good practice point) indicating a recommendation with no evidence.For more on the Guidelines for the Treatment of Alcohol Problems, visit https://alcoh oltre atmen tguid elines.com.au/. Acknowledgements:The Guidelines for the Treatment of Alcohol Problems project was funded by the Australian Government, under the Drug and Alcohol Program. We would like to express our gratitude to members of the Guidelines Steering Committee for providing invaluable guidance and advice on this project. We thank Daniel Winter, Sophia Little, Brennan Geiger and James Pham for providing research and administrative support, and Joshua Watt for providing clinical support, across sections of this supplement. Finally, we thank Donna Ah Chee, Kylie Lee, Teagan Weatherall, Craig Holloway and Martin Nean for conversations and work which informed the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander peoples section in the guidelines and Chapter 4 of this supplement.Competing interests: Paul Haber has been funded by the Lambert Initiative for Cannabinoid Therapeutics at the University of Sydney to undertake clinical trials of cannabinoid treatment for alcohol withdra...