Nowelizacja ustaw samorządowych z 2018 r. wprowadziła do systemu prawnego instytucję komitetów obywatelskiej inicjatywy uchwałodawczej, ściśle związanych z wykonywaniem uprawnień przyznanych mieszkańcom. Przepisy nie określają wprost charakteru prawnego tych tworów. Dzięki analizie przepisów ustalono, że komitety można uznać za specyficzne podmioty prawa administracyjnego o ograniczonym zakresie działania. Nie dysponują natomiast podmiotowością w rozumieniu prawa cywilnego.
Purpose: The purpose of the research was to examine the sociological issues related to the biographical experience of a participant in the administrative procedure in the Visegrad Group countries (the perception of public administration bodies and their organisation, current demands of the public in the field of public administration activities, providing appropriate tangible and intangible tools for officials). The secondary goal of the research was to determine the nature, significance, consequences and form of comprehensive modernisation of existing simplifications of the administrative procedure (The author understands the concept of simplification of administrative procedure as “an administrative procedure separated from the general administrative procedure and characterized by simplification of general normative solutions”). Since the scope of the concept of ”electronisation of administrative procedure” does not fully include the concept of ”simplification of administrative procedure”, the research referred to two areas of the administrative procedure that are complementary to each other (the relationships that occur between them, including by specifying common and separate parts of electronisation of administrative procedure, e.g. in the scope of keeping and making available files of procedure in electronic form). Moreover, solutions were presented in the field of simplification and electronisation of administrative procedures in the V4 Group countries, in institutional, subjective and objective terms.Design/Methodology/Approach: The analysis of domestic and foreign legal texts was used to implement the research assumptions (general legal regulation of administrative procedure presented by the Codes of Administrative Procedure and COVID-19 regulations in the V4 Group countries). Empirical research using sociological research methods was conducted in connection with the analysis of currently applicable simplifying solutions [the author implemented a component of social research using both qualitative methods – individual in-depth interviews with adult residents with biographical experience of being a participant in the administrative procedure (20 adults – 5 from each country of the V4 Group) as well as quantitative methods – online survey with participants of the administrative procedure (120 adults – 30 from each country of the V4 Group)]. In the research, the statistical method was applied to better illustrate the effectiveness of the currently conducted administrative procedure and to answer the hypotheses regarding the legitimacy of the development of the idea of administrative simplification.Findings: The analysis shows that it is not yet possible to speak of an advanced development of administrative procedure in the Visegrad countries. The delay of the public administration in applying solutions that simplify administrative procedure is mainly due to unclear regulations and significant financial outlays needed. The above state of affairs has a negative impact not only on entities participating in the procedure but also on public administration bodies and administrative courts.Practical Implications/Originality/Value: The initiated process of simplifying and electronising administrative procedure must always take the form of comprehensive legal solutions that will allow for effective and efficient operation of public administration bodies and enable individuals to exercise their fundamental rights. Therefore, the article presents the latest difficulties related to the administrative procedure and examples of their solution.
W artykule omówiono problematykę dotyczącą rewindykacji mienia Kościoła Ewangelicko-Unijnego. Jako przykłady posłużyły postępowania regulacyjne wszczęte w stosunku do nieruchomości znajdujących się na terenach województwa wielkopolskiego. W tym celu autor przeanalizował zagadnienie związane z sukcesją uprawnień Kościoła Ewangelicko-Unijnego na rzecz Kościoła Ewangelicko-Augsburskiego oraz możliwością występowania z roszczeniami w stosunku do Skarbu Państwa i samorządów. Ponadto zaprezentowano analizę dotychczasowej praktyki i orzecznictwa wyznaczonej do prowadzenia postępowania regulacyjnego Komisji Regulacyjnej, a także sądów powszechnych i administracyjnych. Autor zwrócił również uwagę na konsekwencje nieprecyzyjnie uregulowanych przez ustawodawcę przepisów, które regulują przedmiotową materię i stwarzają istotny problem w ich interpretacji oraz stosowaniu.
The role of the administrative judiciary on the basis of the relative devolution of the cassation appeal filed with the Supreme Administrative CourtThe important role of administrative courts is to examine the legality of public administration operations, which is a manifestation of the implementation of one of the fundamental constitutional principles, i.e. the principle of a democratic state governed by the rule of law, which gives effect to the principle of social justice. The administrative courts were provided with a new procedural instrument — the exchangeability of a cassation appeal. This institution entitles the voivodship administrative court, which states that in a case the proceedings are invalid or the grounds for the cassation complaint are clearly justified, to revoke the appealed judgment or the decision, also deciding on the application of a party on the reimbursement of the cassation proceedings costs and at the same meeting to reconsider the case.
Sprawozdanie z Międzynarodowej Konferencji Naukowej „Simplifications of administrative procedure”, Poznań, 16–17 września 2021 r.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.