The lower detection rate of 18 F-FDG PET/MRI than 18 F-FDG PET/CT regarding small lung nodules should be considered in the staging of malignant tumors. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of these small lung nodules missed by 18 F-FDG PET/MRI. Methods: Fifty-one oncologic patients (mean age ± SD, 56.6 ± 14.0 y; 29 women, 22 men; tumor stages, I [n 5 7], II [n 5 7], III [n 5 9], IV [n 5 28]) who underwent 18 F-FDG PET/CT and subsequent 18 F-FDG PET/MRI on the same day were retrospectively enrolled. Images were analyzed by 2 interpreters in random order and separate sessions with a minimum of 4 wk apart. A maximum of 10 lung nodules was identified for each patient on baseline imaging. The presence, size, and presence of focal tracer uptake was noted for each lung nodule detected on 18 F-FDG PET/CT and 18 F-FDG PET/MRI using a postcontrast T1-weighted 3-dimensional gradient echo volume-interpolated breath-hold examination sequence with fat suppression as morphologic dataset. Follow-up CT or 18 F-FDG PET/CT (mean time to follow-up, 11 mo; range, 3-35 mo) was used as a reference standard to define each missed nodule as benign or malignant based on changes in size and potential new tracer uptake. Nodule-to-nodule comparison between baseline and follow-up was performed using descriptive statistics. Results: Out of 134 lung nodules found on 18 F-FDG PET/CT, 18 F-FDG PET/MRI detected 92 nodules. Accordingly, 42 lung nodules (average size ± SD, 3.9 ± 1.3 mm; range, 2-7 mm) were missed by 18 F-FDG PET/MRI. None of the missed lung nodules presented with focal tracer uptake on baseline imaging or follow-up 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Thirty-three out of 42 missed lung nodules (78.6%) in 26 patients were rated benign, whereas 9 nodules (21.4%) in 4 patients were rated malignant. As a result, 1 patient required upstaging from tumor stage I to IV. Conclusion: Although most small lung nodules missed on 18 F-FDG PET/MRI were found to be benign, there was a relevant number of undetected metastases. However, in patients with advanced tumor stages the clinical impact remains controversial as upstaging is usually more relevant in lower stages.
Purpose: To compare the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) in non-small cell lung cancer lesions with standardized uptake values (SUV) derived from combined 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose-positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (FDG-PET/MRI) and those derived from FDG-PET/CT.
Materials and Methods: In 18 consecutive patients with histologically proven NSCLC (17 men, 1 woman; mean age, 61???12 years), whole-body FDG-PET/MRI was performed after whole-body FDG-PET/CT. Regions of interest (ROI) encompassing the entire primary tumor were drawn into FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MR images to determine the maximum and mean standardized uptake value (SUVmax; SUVmean) and into ADC parameter maps to assess mean ADC values. Pearson?s correlation coefficients were calculated to compare SUV and ADC values.
Results: The SUVmax of NSCLC was 12.3???4.8 [mean ?SD], and the SUVmean was 7.2???2.8 as assessed by FDG-PET/MRI. The SUVmax and SUVmean derived from FDG-PET/CT and FDG-PET/MRI correlated well (R?=?0.93; p?0.001 and R?=?0.92; p?0.001, respectively). The ADCmean of the pulmonary tumors was 187.9???88.8???10?5?mm?/s [mean???SD]. The ADCmean exhibited a significant inverse correlation with the SUVmax (R?=??0.72; p?0.001) as well as with the SUVmean assessed by FDG-PET/MRI (R?=??0.71; p?0.001).
Conclusion: This simultaneous PET/MRI study corroborates the assumed significant inverse correlation between increased metabolic activity on FDG-PET and restricted diffusion on DWI in NSCLC.
Citation Format:
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.