The a posteriori analysis of the discretization error and the modeling error is studied for a compliance cost functional in the context of the optimization of composite elastic materials and a two-scale linearized elasticity model. A mechanically simple, parametrized microscopic supporting structure is chosen and the parameters describing the structure are determined minimizing the compliance objective. An a posteriori error estimate is derived which includes the modeling error caused by the replacement of a nested laminate microstructure by this considerably simpler microstructure. Indeed, nested laminates are known to realize the minimal compliance and provide a benchmark for the quality of the microstructures. To estimate the local difference in the compliance functional the dual weighted residual approach is used. Different numerical experiments show that the resulting adaptive scheme leads to simple parametrized microscopic supporting structures that can compete with the optimal nested laminate construction. The derived a posteriori error indicators allow to verify that the suggested simplified microstructures achieve the optimal value of the compliance up to a few percent. Furthermore, it is shown how discretization error and modeling error can be balanced by choosing an optimal level of grid refinement. Our two scale results with a single scale microstructure can provide guidance towards the design of a producible macroscopic fine scale pattern.
A posteriori error estimates are derived in the context of two-dimensional structural elastic shape optimization under the compliance objective. It is known that the optimal shape features are microstructures that can be constructed using sequential lamination. The descriptive parameters explicitly depend on the stress. To derive error estimates the dual weighted residual approach for control problems in PDE constrained optimization is employed, involving the elastic solution and the microstructure parameters. Rigorous estimation of interpolation errors ensures robustness of the estimates while local approximations are used to obtain fully practical error indicators. Numerical results show sharply resolved interfaces between regions of full and intermediate material density.
Abstract. This article is concerned with different approaches to elastic shape optimization under stochastic loading. The underlying stochastic optimization strategy builds upon the methodology of two-stage stochastic programming. In fact, in the case of linear elasticity and quadratic objective functional our strategy leads to a computational cost which scales linearly in the number of linearly independent applied forces, even for a large set of realization of the random loading. We consider, besides minimization of the expectation value of suitable objective functionals, also two different risk-averse approaches, namely the expected excess and the excess probability. Numerical computations are performed using either a level-set approach representing implicit shapes of general topology in combination with composite finite elements to resolve elasticity in two and three dimensions, or a collocation boundary element approach, where polygonal shapes represent geometric details attached to a lattice and describing a perforated elastic domain. Topology optimization is performed using the concept of topological derivatives. We generalize this concept, and derive an analytical expression which takes into account the interaction between neighboring holes. This is expected to allow efficient and reliable optimization strategies of elastic objects with a large number of geometries details on a fine scale. Mathematics Subject Classification (2000). 90C15, 74B05, 65N30, 65N38, 34E08, 49K45.Keywords. shape optimization in elasticity, two-stage stochastic programming, risk averse optimization, level set method, boundary element method, topological derivative.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.