The survival in the segmentectomy group was not inferior to patients treated with lobectomy. In conclusion, the current meta-analysis disclosed that segmentectomies produce similar survival compared to lobectomy for patients with stage I NSCLC. To establish the role of segmentectomy in early NSCLC, more evidence is needed, in particular, a large numbered, prospective, randomised trials, which should dissolve the uncertainties and the questions raised by retrospective data.

OBJECTIVES Our goal was to report the results of the first consensus paper among international experts in uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (UniVATS) lobectomy obtained through a Delphi process, the objective of which was to define and standardize the main procedural steps, optimize its indications and perioperative management and identify elements to assist in future training. METHODS The 40 members of the working group were convened and organized on a voluntary basis by the Uniportal VATS Interest Group (UVIG) of the European Society of Thoracic Surgeons (ESTS). An e-consensus finding exercise using the Delphi method was applied to require 75% agreement for reaching consensus on each question. Repeated iterations of anonymous voting continued for 3 rounds. RESULTS Overall, 31 international experts from 18 countries completed all 3 rounds of questionnaires. Although a technical quorum was not achieved, most of the responders agreed that the maximum size of a UniVATS incision should be ≤4 cm. Agreement was reached on many points outlining the currently accepted definition of a UniVATS lobectomy, its indications and contraindications, perioperative clinical management and recommendations for training and future research directions. CONCLUSIONS The UVIG Consensus Report stated that UniVATS offers a valid alternative to standard VATS techniques. Only longer follow-up and randomized controlled studies will predict whether UniVATS represents a valid alternative approach to multiport VATS for major lung resections or whether it should be performed only in selected cases and by selected centres. The next step for the ESTS UVIG is the establishment of a UniVATS section inside the ESTS databases.

Background. Primary Ewing sarcoma (ES) can sometimes present as a chest-wall tumor. Multidisciplinary management, including chemotherapy and local treatment consisting of surgery, radiotherapy (RT), or both, has improved the survival of patients with localized ES; however, the best approach to achieving local control remains controversial.Methods. We retrospectively analyzed data from 198 patients with non-metastatic ES of the chest wall, who were registered in the database of the German Society of Pediatric Hematology and Oncology between July 1998 and April 2009. The majority of patients (n = 130) presented with rib tumors; 7 patients received RT only, 85 patients underwent surgery alone, and 106 patients were treated with a combination of surgery and RT. Results. Overall survival in all patients was 78 and 71 % at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Event-free survival at 5 years (5-year EFS) was 57 % in the RT group, 73 % in the surgery group and 63 % in the surgery ? RT group. In patients with complete resections, 5-year EFS did not improve with the addition of RT compared with surgery alone. There was no difference in the 5-year EFS in patients with partial (63 %) or total (64 %) resection of the affected ribs, and median follow-up was 4.71 years (range 0.40-13.48). Conclusions. Complete tumor resection is the best way to achieve local control of ES of the chest wall; additional RT is only useful in patients with incomplete resection. The main limitation of this study was its retrospective nature, and the benefit of total resection of the affected ribs could not be proved.Ewing sarcoma (ES) is a rare, highly malignant disease found in children, adolescents, and young adults, with a reported incidence of three persons per million people per year within a Caucasian population. Median age at diagnosis is 15 years, 1 and the chest wall is the primary site of presentation in 14 % of patients. The tumor most commonly originates from osseous structures (ribs 9 %, scapula 4 %, clavicle 1 %, or sternum \1 %), and even less frequently from the soft tissue of the chest wall (\1 %). 2 ESs of the chest wall have also been referred to as Askin's tumors, 3 until an identical molecular signature revealed a common origin.Multidisciplinary management has improved the 5-year survival of patients with localized disease to rates of 60-70 % and higher. 4-6 Multimodal therapy includes systemic therapy as well as surgery and radiotherapy (RT). 7 Until now, clinical trials on ES have principally focused on a comprehensive investigation of systemic treatment. 8-10 Although multi-agent chemotherapy is well defined as the standard of care for ES patients, the best approach for local control of ES of the chest wall remains a matter of discussion. 11 Local treatment of chest-wall tumors is often challenging, especially in young patients, as both local treatment modalities (surgery and RT) may be associated with significant long-term sequelae. 12 Due to the rarity of ES of the chest wall, only a limited number of patient series have been publis...

Background: Uniportal video-assisted thoracoscopy (VATS) has increasingly gained importance in the thoracic surgery scenario. The use of this technique can reduce postoperative pain and length of stay and gives the surgeon the same operative perspective as open surgery. Methods: We retrospectively analysed the data of 73 patients who underwent uniportal VATS lobectomies from November 2014 to December 2015 in our institution. We divided the patients in two groups (group 1: first 30 patients vs. group 2: established phase, 43 patients) to compare and evaluate the data regarding the learning curve. To explore evolution of learning curve, data were plotted to calculate Spearman's Rank-Order Correlation. R (version 3.2.3) was used for statistical analysis. Results: The median age was 69.9 (group 1) and 68.8 (group 2) years. Mean operative time was 84.9±33.0 (group 1) and 84.8±31.5 (group 2) minutes. The conversion rate was 13.3% in group 1 vs. 9.3% in group 2, showing a significant learning reduction (rho=0.590). Overall morbidity rate was 15.1%. The most common complication consisted in prolonged air leak. Interpolation line of complications showed a significant decrease due to learning curve (rho=0.676). The median length of stay was 4 days in group 1 vs. 3 days in group 2. The 30-day mortality was 3.3% in group 1 and 0% in group 2. Conclusions: The comparison between the groups showed that the median length of stay, operative time, conversion rate and 30-day mortality statistically significantly improved in the established phase. Also, complications like prolonged air leak were decreasing in the established phase. In conclusion, the uniportal VATS lobectomy technique can be performed safely from experienced surgeons without major complications and with an acceptable mortality rate.

Background: The management of the intersegmental plane (ISP) is challenging during uniport videoassisted thoracoscopic (VATS) pulmonary segmentectomy. Staplers and electrocautery have been used extensively in ISP management. However, both of them have their respective drawbacks. Currently, we have provided a revised technique termed as "Combined Dimensional Reduction Method" (CDR method), for managing the ISP with combined application of ultrasonic scalpel and staplers. The study aimed to review the outcomes of patients who underwent uniport VATS segmentectomy with or without the CDR method in our institute and assess the feasibility and safety of the CDR method.Methods: From March 2017 to February 2018, 220 patients who underwent uniport VATS segmentectomy were retrospectively reviewed. By using IQQA software, pulmonary structures were reconstructed as three-dimensional (3D) images, making the targeted structures could be identified preoperatively. For the management of the ISP, in the CDR group, we firstly used the ultrasonic scalpel to trim the 3D pulmonary structure along the intersegmental demarcation, making the remaining targeted parenchyma both sufficiently thin enough and located on a 2D plane; thus, enabling easy use of staplers in managing ISP. Whereas, in the non-CDR group, we only use the staplers to manage the ISPs. The clinical characteristics, complications, and postoperative pulmonary functions were compared between the two groups.Results: Propensity score analysis generated 2 well-matched pairs of 71 patients in CDR and non-CDR groups. There was no 30-day postoperative death or readmission in either group. The CDR group was significantly associated with the shorter operative time (178.3±35.8 vs. 209.2±28.7 min) (P=0.031) and postoperative stay (4.5±2.3 vs. 5.7±4.2 days) (P=0.041), compared to the non-CDR group. Moreover, no significant difference was observed in blood loss, a period of chest tube drainage, a period of ultrafine tube drainage, and postoperative pulmonary complications between the two groups. Moreover, the recovery rate of postoperative forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) or vital capacity (VC) at 1 and 3 months after segmentectomy was comparable between them. Conclusions:The CDR method could make segmentectomy easier and more accurate, and therefore has the potential to be a viable and effective technique for uniport VATS pulmonary segmentectomy.