Backround:The American Academy of Neurology recommended using phenytoin or carbamazepine to prevent early post-traumatic seizures (PTS) in severe traumatic brain injuries (TBI). In this study, we examined the effects of using phenytoin prophylaxis on mild, moderate, and severe TBIs. There have been no studies looking at compliance rate and side effects of systematic use of phenytoin at a large population scale. The goal of this study is to determine 1) the proportion of TBI patients receiving phenytoin prophylaxis; 2) which parameters decided when to decide administer phenytoin; 3) prophylaxis efficacy and complication rate.Methods:We retrospectively studied all patients admitted with a TBI over a two year-period and collected the following information: age, GCS score, CT-scan Marshall grade, incidence of early PTS, incidence of phenytoin use and time delay, side effects, and incidence of over-dosage or under-dosage.Results:1008 patients were included. 5.4 % had early PTS, 2.3 % while on prophylaxis and 3.1% while not on prophylaxis, 1.9% before reaching the hospital and 1.2% prior to phenytoin administration while in hospital. Delay of administration was 5 hours. 64.8% received prophylaxis and physicians used positive CT scan as the primary decision-making parameter (p<.001). Compliance with guidelines was 99.7%. Adverse reactions occurred in 0.5%. Levels were drawn in 42.2% (52% therapeutic, 41% low, 7% high).Conclusions:Phenytoin is used according to guidelines, with CT scan being the main decision factor for its use. The frequency of early PTS rate is low and side effects are rare. However, earlier administration of phenytoin and adequate levels could further prevent early PTS.
Although no definitive conclusions could be reached based on the data collected, this study does give valuable insight into future avenues of research on the topic of hemodynamic management in traumatic ASCI as well as provides guidelines for refinement of future study design.
The aim of this work was to perform a scoping systematic review on the animal literature surrounding mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and functional outcomes post-acute spinal cord injury (ASCI). We performed a systematic review of the literature by searching: MEDLINE, BIOSIS, EMBASE, Global Health, SCOPUS, and Cochrane Library from inception to January 2015. We also performed a hand search of various published meeting proceedings. Through a two-step review process, using two independent reviewers, we selected articles for the final review based on pre-defined inclusion/exclusion criteria. Ten studies were included within the final systematic review. A variety of animal models were used within these studies. All included studies had some objective means of documenting functional outcome post-manipulation of the MAP. Four studies could be considered to be "positive studies," showing some neurological improvement or beneficial effect to having the blood pressure manipulated. Two studies displayed worse functional outcomes secondary to episodes of hypotension. Four studies failed to demonstrate a relationship between MAP and functional outcome within the animal models. This review concludes that, within the animal literature, there is insufficient evidence to draw a conclusion about the effect of MAP on neurological outcome in animal models of ASCI.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.