Habituation is an adaptation seen in many organisms, defined by a reduction in the response to repeated stimuli. Evolutionarily, habituation is thought to benefit the organism by allowing conservation of metabolic resources otherwise spent on sub-lethal provocations including repeated cold exposure. Hypermetabolic and/or insulative adaptations may occur after prolonged and severe cold exposures, resulting in enhanced cold defense mechanisms such as increased thermogenesis and peripheral vasoconstriction, respectively. Habituation occurs prior to these adaptations in response to short duration mild cold exposures, and, perhaps counterintuitively, elicits a reduction in cold defense mechanisms demonstrated through higher skin temperatures, attenuated shivering, and reduced cold sensations. These habituated responses likely serve to preserve peripheral tissue temperature and conserve energy during non-life threatening cold stress. The purpose of this review is to define habituation in general terms, present evidence for the response in non-human species, and provide an up-to-date, critical examination of past studies and the potential physiological mechanisms underlying human cold habituation. Our aim is to stimulate interest in this area of study and promote further experiments to understand this physiological adaptation.

Acetazolamide (AZ) is a medication commonly used to prevent acute mountain sickness (AMS) during rapid ascent to high altitude. However, it is unclear whether AZ use impairs exercise performance; previous literature regarding this topic is equivocal. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of AZ on time-trial (TT) performance during a 30-h exposure to hypobaric hypoxia equivalent to 3,500-m altitude. Ten men [sea-level peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak): 50.8 ± 6.5 mL·kg−1·min−1; body fat %: 20.6 ± 5.2%] completed 2 30-h exposures at 3,500 m. In a crossover study design, subjects were given 500 mg/day of either AZ or a placebo. Exercise testing was completed 2 h and 24 h after ascent and consisted of 15-min steady-state treadmill walking at 40%–45% sea-level VO2peak, followed by a 2-mile self-paced treadmill TT. AMS was assessed after ~12 h and 22 h at 3,500 m. The incidence of AMS decreased from 40% with placebo to 0% with AZ. Oxygen saturation was higher ( P < 0.05) in AZ versus placebo trials at the end of the TT after 2 h (85 ± 3% vs. 79 ± 3%) and 24 h (86 ± 3% vs. 81 ± 4%). There was no difference in time to complete 2 miles between AZ and PL after 2 h (20.7 ± 3.2 vs. 22.7 ± 5.0 min, P > 0.05) or 24 h (21.5 ± 3.4 vs. 21.1 ± 2.9 min, P > 0.05) of exposure to altitude. Our results suggest that AZ (500 mg/day) does not negatively impact endurance exercise performance at 3,500 m. NEW & NOTEWORTHY To our knowledge, this is the first study to examine the impact of acetazolamide (500 mg/day) versus placebo on self-paced, peak-effort exercise performance using a short-duration exercise test in a hypobaric hypoxic environment with a repeated-measures design. In the present study, acetazolamide did not impact exercise performance after 2-h or 24-h exposure to 3,500-m simulated altitude.

This study examined whether normobaric hypoxia (NH) treatment is more efficacious for sustaining high-altitude (HA) acclimatization-induced improvements in ventilatory and hematologic responses, acute mountain sickness (AMS), and cognitive function during reintroduction to altitude (RA) than no treatment at all. Seventeen sea-level (SL) residents (age = 23 ± 6 yr; means ± SE) completed in the following order: ) 4 days of SL testing;) 12 days of HA acclimatization at 4,300 m; ) 12 days at SL post-HA acclimatization (Post) where each received either NH ( = 9, [Formula: see text] = 0.122) or Sham ( = 8; [Formula: see text] = 0.207) treatment; and ) 24-h reintroduction to 4,300-m altitude (RA) in a hypobaric chamber (460 Torr). End-tidal carbon dioxide pressure ([Formula: see text]), hematocrit (Hct), and AMS cerebral factor score were assessed at SL, on HA2 and HA11, and after 20 h of RA. Cognitive function was assessed using the SynWin multitask performance test at SL, on HA1 and HA11, and after 4 h of RA. There was no difference between NH and Sham treatment, so data were combined. [Formula: see text] (mmHg) decreased from SL (37.2 ± 0.5) to HA2 (32.2 ± 0.6), decreased further by HA11 (27.1 ± 0.4), and then increased from HA11 during RA (29.3 ± 0.6). Hct (%) increased from SL (42.3 ± 1.1) to HA2 (45.9 ± 1.0), increased again from HA2 to HA11 (48.5 ± 0.8), and then decreased from HA11 during RA (46.4 ± 1.2). AMS prevalence (%) increased from SL (0 ± 0) to HA2 (76 ± 11) and then decreased at HA11 (0 ± 0) and remained depressed during RA (17 ± 10). SynWin scores decreased from SL (1,615 ± 62) to HA1 (1,306 ± 94), improved from HA1 to HA11 (1,770 ± 82), and remained increased during RA (1,707 ± 75). These results demonstrate that HA acclimatization-induced improvements in ventilatory and hematologic responses, AMS, and cognitive function are partially retained during RA after 12 days at SL whether or not NH treatment is utilized. This study demonstrates that normobaric hypoxia treatment over a 12-day period at sea level was not more effective for sustaining high-altitude (HA) acclimatization during reintroduction to HA than no treatment at all. The noteworthy aspect is that athletes, mountaineers, and military personnel do not have to go to extraordinary means to retain HA acclimatization to an easily accessible and relevant altitude if reexposure occurs within a 2-wk time period.