La Vía Campesina organisations have identified the area of education and training as a strategic and priority arena of intervention to bring about change in the political-pedagogical perspective. This involves rethinking and redesigning the conventional training processes towards the collective experiences of learning, organisation, exchange and living. With this approach in mind, and based on the experiences and educational contributions made by peasant organisations, this paper presents the systematisation of the Baserritik Mundura experience, analysing and sharing the learning derived from this case study and establishing the integral role of the pedagogic proposal as an axis for systematisation. This analysis, from the logic of the systematisation of processes, promulgates the learnings of this agroecological training experience while exposing both its strengths and weaknesses. We present the learning linked to the pedagogic dimensions that, through a cross-over method, aim to create a multidimensional educational environment which transforms our subjectivities, practices and the beliefs that sustain them. This learning is presented in eight main areas related to: (1) organicity, (2) alternation, (3) the mystical and ludic-cultural dimension, (4) the contents, subjects and teaching team, (5) the proposal as a whole and its perspective of popular education and action research, (6) the transversality of the feminist perspective, (7) linguistic plurality and (8) the pedagogic political support of the process. In addition, we present considerations related to the learning identified in the systematisation itself. On the one hand, we look at the lack of training processes in the official university context related to an alternation system with an organicity linked to the territory, and the need for the practical development of a dynamic of the collective construction of knowledge with a view toward transforming the logics that underpin the existing hegemonic ideologies. On the other hand, we point out the need for a debate regarding the epistemological perspective and integral, experiential and emancipatory pedagogical perspectives. Even with their limitations and challenges, these proposals have great potential to train, organise, politicise, excite and connect people from different fields towards the construction of a fairer, healthier and more sustainable agroecological agri-food system, based on food sovereignty and the everyday lives of people
O presente artigo apresenta a experiência do curso de especialização “Residência Agrária: Matrizes produtivas da vida no campo”, da UnB, ocorrido entre 2013 e 2015, com o objetivo de identificar os resultados quantitativos e qualitativos das dinâmicas desenvolvidas. O trabalho também situa no tempo histórico a importância dessas dinâmicas de curso para a educação do campo e como estratégias de articulação entre universidades, movimentos populares e territórios camponeses e quilombolas. O artigo destaca a metodologia empregada no curso, desenvolvida a partir da concepção estratégica de organização social e capilarização da universidade nos territórios por meio do trabalho articulado entre as matrizes produtivas da vida no campo, com ênfase na Agroecologia, Cultura, Comunicação e Arte, Cooperação e Formação Humana. Como resultado do processo analisado, o trabalho destaca as atividades das Escolas Itinerantes de Formação nos Núcleos Territoriais como forma de dinamizar o protagonismo coletivo das comunidades e a horizontalização das relações de parceria entre universidades e movimentos sociais. A metodologia empregada no curso viabilizou a formação de um perfil mais interdisciplinar e abrangente dos profissionais que atuam em territórios camponeses e quilombolas do Distrito Federal e Entorno. PALAVRAS-CHAVE: Educação do Campo. Residência Agrária. Universidade. Movimento Camponês.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.