Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic autoimmune liver disease characterized by ongoing inflammatory destruction of the interlobular bile ducts, eventually leading to chronic cholestasis and biliary cirrhosis. This study primarily aims to define the metabolomic signature of PBC after comparison with healthy controls (HC). Second, it aims to evaluate the possible metabolic association between PBC and celiac disease (CD), an immune-mediated disorder frequently associated with PBC. Serum and urine samples from 20 PBC, 21 CD, and 19 sex-matched HC subjects were collected. 1 H nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectra for all samples were acquired, and multivariate statistics were used to evaluate the differences among the three groups and to provide information about the involved metabolites. The classification accuracies to discriminate PBC and HC groups were 78.9−84.6% for serum and 76.9% for urine. In comparison to HC, PBC patient sera were characterized by altered levels (p value <0.05) of pyruvate, citrate, glutamate, glutamine, serine, tyrosine, phenylalanine, and lactate. PBC patient urine showed lower levels (p value <0.05) of trigonelline and hippurate with respect to HC. Furthermore, the NMR metabolomic fingerprint was able to cluster PBC with respect to CD patients, and the classification accuracies in the discriminations between these groups were 81.9−91.7% for serum and 77.7% for urine. Our results show that PBC displays a unique metabolomic fingerprint, which led to speculation about an impaired energy metabolism, probably associated with an altered gut microbiota. PBC and CD showed two distinct metabolic fingerprints. These data could provide clues for the comprehension of the PBC pathogenetic mechanisms and the detection of novel therapeutic targets.
Background and study aims Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) is the current standard for bariatric surgery, but it is affected by several postoperative complications. Endoscopic sleeve gastroplasty (ESG) was created as a less invasive alternative to LSG. However, its efficacy and safety compared with LSG is unclear.
Materials and methods Relevant publications were identified in MEDLINE/Cochrane/EMBASE/OVID/ PROSPERO and NIH up to January 2020. Studies were selected that included obese patients with a baseline body mass index (BMI) between 30 and 40 kg/m² with a minimum of 12 months of follow-up and with reported incidence of complications. The mean difference in percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL) at 12 months between LSG and ESG represented the primary endpoint. We also assessed the difference in pooled rate of adverse events. The quality of the studies and heterogeneity among them was analyzed.
Results Sixteen studies were selected for a total of 2188 patients (LSG: 1429; ESG: 759) with a mean BMI 34.34 and 34.72 kg/m² for LSG and ESG, respectively. Mean %EWL was 80.32 % (± 12.20; 95 % CI; P = 0.001; I² = 98.88) and 62.20 % (± 4.38; 95 % CI; P = 0.005; I² = 65.52) for the LSG and ESG groups, respectively, corresponding to an absolute difference of 18.12 % (± 0.89; 95 % CI, P = 0.0001). The difference in terms of mean rate of adverse events was 0.19 % (± 0.37; 95 %CI; χ 2 = 1.602; P = 0.2056).
Conclusions Our analysis showed a moderate superiority of LSG versus ESG. No difference in terms of safety was shown between the two groups. ESG is a less-invasive, repeatable and reversable and acceptable option for mild-moderate obese patients.
Our real-life experience showed that CR decreased over time and was achieved by almost one-third of the cohort at the last follow-up visit. Golimumab showed an overall favorable safety profile and the results were not different between biological naive and experienced patients. Future research is needed to confirm our results and to identify criteria to select patients most likely to respond.
The full-thickness resection device (FTRD) is a novel endoscopic device approved for the resection of colorectal lesions. This case-series describes the device and its use in high-risk patients with colorectal lesions and provides an overview of the potential indications in recently published data.
Between December 2014 and September 2015, 3 patients underwent endoscopic full thickness resection using the FTRD for colorectal lesions: 1 case for a T1 adenocarcinoma in the region of a surgical anastomosis after recto-sigmoidectomy, 1 case for a non-lifting colonic adenoma with low-grade dysplasia in an 89-year old patient and 1 for a recurrent adenoma with high-grade dysplasia in a young patient with ulcerative rectocolitis who was under immunosuppression after renal transplantation. Both technical and clinical success rates were achieved in all cases. The size of removed lesions ranged from 9 to 30 mm.Overall, the most frequent indication in the literature has been for lifting or non-lifting adenoma, submucosal tumors, neuroendocrin tumors, incomplete endoscopic resection (R1) or T1 carcinoma.Colorectal FTRD is a feasible technique for the treatment of colorectal lesions and represents a minimally invasive alternative for either surgical or conventional endoscopic resection strategies.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.