High dose intravenous glucocorticoid pulse (i.v. GCS) therapy is a proven approach in patients with active, moderate to severe Graves' orbitopathy (GO) and dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON). In moderate to severe GO, the European Group on Graves' Orbitopathy (EUGOGO) recommends a 12-week course of intravenous methylprednisolone (i.v. MP) pulse therapy with a cumulative dose of 4.5 g. The response rate of i.v. GCS treatment is significantly higher than oral glucocorticoid (oral GCS) therapy and is associated with fewer adverse events. However, a major concern was raised because of reports of fatal side effects which may be associated with this therapy, especially when single and cumulative doses of methylprednisolone (MP) are higher than recommended. The prevalence and severity of adverse effects during treatment have not been fully described. The aim of this review was to summarise the frequency of major adverse effects of i.v. GCS compared to oral GCS and attempt to propose some practical suggestions as to how to monitor and prevent the development of side effects.
Introduction: To evaluate the effectiveness of methylprednisolone (MP) and surgical treatment in achieving complete reversal of dysthyroid optic neuropathy (DON) and predictive factors of this therapy. Material and methods: The group consisted of 10 patients (18 eyes) with DON. The diagnosis of DON was based on at least two criteria from the following: (i) deterioration of visual acuity (VA < 1.0), (ii) loss of colour vision, (iii) optic disc swelling, and/or (iv) signs of DON in magnetic resonance imaging (presence of apical crowding and/or optic nerve stretching). A complete recovery of DON was defined as the normalisation of VA (VA = 1.0), normal colour vision, and reversal of optic disc swelling. A significant improvement was defined as improvement of VA of at least 0.2. The consecutive steps of treatment of DON consisted of: (i) first-line treatment -intravenous MP pulse therapy (3 × 1 g); (ii) second-line treatment -endoscopic intranasal orbital decompression of medial wall; (iii) additional treatment -additional MP therapy and/or surgical decompression. Results: A significant improvement in VA could be achieved in the majority of patients; a complete recovery was noted in 22.2%, 33.3%, and 66.7% of eyes after first-line, second-line, and additional treatment, respectively. Positive predictive factors were: younger age (p = 0.049), shorter duration of DON (p = 0.035), and a higher Graves' orbitopathy clinical activity score (p = 0.035). Conclusions: By using combination therapy (intravenous MP pulse therapy and surgical decompression), a complete recovery can be achieved in the majority of patients with DON. (Endokrynol Pol 2016; 67 (2): 166-173)
The data concerning epidemiological determinants of the bladder neck (BN) mobility are scarce. The aim of the study was to determine epidemiological features and identify factors influencing BN position at rest and BN mobility in patients without pelvic organ prolapse (POP). Seven hundred and ninety-six patients that attended two outpatient clinics were enrolled in the study. Position and mobility of the BN were measured with the use of pelvic floor ultrasound. Demographic and functional factors that were hypothesized to influence BN mobility were assessed. Vaginal deliveries (VDs) and age ≥65 were associated with lower BN position at rest. Higher BN mobility was observed in women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). In obese women, higher BN position and lower BN mobility was observed compared to non-obese women, and it was correlated with longer urethras in this group of patients. VDs and their number were associated with increased BN mobility, independently of body mass index (BMI). To conclude, obesity, VDs, and age are factors associated with changes in bladder neck position at rest and its mobility. Higher BMI correlates with restricted BN mobility, and, therefore, the incidence of SUI in obese patients is probably not connected to BN hypermobility.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.